ABOUT HARDBLOGGER

Hardblogger delivers opinions and analysis on the latest political news by MSNBC anchors, correspondents, analysts and contributors. Whenever news breaks, Hardblogger will break it down, so check in often.

Hardball with Chris Matthews airs weeknights on MSNBC.



Matthews: Clinton proves herself a 'great politician'

Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:11 PM by Cathy Finkler

On Thursday's "Hardball," Chris Matthews gave a detailed explanation which clarified his comments made about Sen. Hillary Clinton during a recent appearance on "Morning Joe."

Below is a transcript of Matthew's explanation.

"We're in a time of a lot of frustration: Iraq, the lack of health care for working people, gas prices, the weakening economy. I come on “Hardball” every night and try to wrestle with these frustrations, and moments of change – we might soon have the first woman president, the first African-American president, or a man older than we've elected before – always with the hope, our uniquely American hope, that we can actually make things better, that we can make this greatest of countries not only survive, but, as William Faulkner once said, “prevail.”

In the midst of talking about all this, almost always without a script; almost always on tricky subjects of gender and race and right and left; what's in our country's interest; who I think is telling the truth and who I think isn't, I know that I'm dealing with sensitive feelings.

I have accepted all of this as part of the business I have chosen. This program, I am proud to say, is tough, fearless and, yes, blunt. I want people to react when I say something. I don't like saying things so carefully, so politically correctly, that no one thinks I even said something.

What I've always counted on, in all the wild, speeded-up conversations on “Hardball” and elsewhere on television, is my good heart. I have always felt that, no matter how tough I got, how direct, how provocative, how purposely provocative, people out there watching would know I was not out against them, that it was them I was rooting for; that while I was tough on individuals who sought to lead the country, I was not against the hopes we all have for a fair shake, in fact a better deal for people who've been held back before we came along.

Some people I respect, politically concerned people like you who watch this show so faithfully, people like me, who care about this country, think I've been disrespectful to Hillary Clinton, not as a candidate but as a woman. They point to something I said on MSNBC's “Morning Joe” the morning after the New Hampshire primary: that her election to the Senate and all that's come since was a result of her toughness but also the sympathy for her because her husband embarrassed her by the conduct that led to his impeachment, because he, in the words I used, "messed around."

The truth, of course, is finer, smarter, larger than that. Yes, Hillary Clinton won tremendous respect from the country for the way she handled those months in 1998. Her public approval numbers spiked from the mid-40s up to the 70s in one poll I looked at. Why? Because she stuck to her duty. She performed strongly as first lady. She did such a "wow" of a job campaigning for Senate candidates, especially Chuck Schumer of New York, that she was urged to run for a Senate seat there herself. She might well have gotten this far by another route and through different circumstances, but this is how it happened.

The rest is history: how Hillary went up to New York, listened to people's concerns and beat the odds as well as the Republicans to become a respected member of the U.S. Senate.

So did I say it right? Was it fair to say that Hillary Clinton, like any great politician, took advantage of a crisis to prove herself? Was her conduct in 1998 a key to starting her independent electoral career the following year? Yes. Was it fair to imply that Hillary's whole career depended on being a victim of an unfaithful husband? No. And that's what it sounded like I was saying and it hurt people who I'd like to think normally like what I say; in fact, like me.

As I said, I rely on my heart to guide me in the heated, fast-paced talk we have here on “Hardball,” a heart that bears only good will toward people trying to make it, especially those who haven't before. If my heart has not always controlled my words, on those occasions when I have not taken the time to says things right or have simply said the inappropriate thing, I will try to be clearer, smarter, more obviously in support of the right of women, all people, to full equality of respect and ambition.

So I get it. On the particular point: If I'd said that the only reason John McCain has come so far is that he got shot down over North Vietnam and captured by the enemy, I'd be brutally ignoring the courage and guts he showed in bearing up under his captivity. Saying Sen.Clinton got where she's got simply because her husband did what he did to her is just as callous, and, I can see now, came across just as nasty – worse yet, just as dismissive.

Finally, as if anyone doesn't know this: I love politics. I like politicians. I like and respect people with the guts to put their name and their very being out there for public approval so they can help lead our country. And that goes for Hillary and Barack and John and all the rest who are willing to fight to take on the toughest job in the world." Watch complete video

 

 

 


 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

How many crows have you eaten after all the
criticisms of Hillary and your cheerleading
for Barrack especially after the pollster debacle
in New Hampshire. Your opinions are sickening
and you don't let your guests finish their sentences.
Chris, I appreciate your sincerity, honesty & enthusiasm...always enjoy your show with lots of insight & truth.  Please do not go overboard now with your guilt (or please, don't tell me Bill Clinton is pressuring you, too?  His statement that the press was unfair to Hillary seemed incongruent with what I saw happening)and give her more breaks than Obama.  I was really disappointed in your enthusiastic declaration that Clinton "won" the debate & neutralized Obama & Edwards.  I hope as you analize it closer, you will see that it is Obama who always takes the high road (forgiving Clinton & her campaign for the continual unwarrented attacks; MSNBC had an excellent summary of the "racial" events, which were totally Clinton's doing), is honest (his acknowledged "weakness", which obviously has not interfered with his ability to build the best organized campaign from scratch ever seen!), is equally knowlegable & "experienced" as Clinton and is "Presidential"(an inspirational leader, intelligent, high level of integrity).  He is more consistant on his positions and doesn't take PAC money like Clinton (why did Brian decide at the last minute not to allow Edwards to ask his question about pharmaceutical lobbyist money to Clinton as well? And then Brian very rudely refused to acknowledge that Obama had a question he was not allowed to ask a candidate...so Clinton had NO questions asked of her!!) And Bill Clinton wants to accuse the media of not treating Hillary fairly?  The Clintons represent the politics of the past...the good ole boy  (girl)favors, money, negative campaigning, corruption and half truths.  Has everyone forgotten that Bill Clinton LIED to the American people?  How can people trust him?  In Iowa, we had a long time to get to know the candidates and their campaigns up close & personal.  We got it right in Iowa...Obama will lead us to the promised land (if we all work hard!)...he is the real deal...let's not let this truly unique leader go. Please give him a fair shake!!!! He's trying to lead us on a new path & is up against great odds as he tries to beat the corporate Clinton machine.
Your remark about Hillary Cliinton disturbed me a great deal.  I am not Hillary's biggest fan, but what you said made me uncomfortable. I'm glad that you now realize your mistake. I have always enjoyed your show and will continue watching.
Why did you apoligize for speaking the Truth Chris.  Everyone knows the only reason she is where she is is because of the Hummer Bill got.  She is the worst frontrunner canidate the Dems have ever had.
Christopher It Is About Time That you Showed The Class!!!! That You Demand Of Others

Good Luck On you Your Redemption
Mr. Matthews: To rely on your 'good heart' without meaning to deflect your accountability under the guise of pure intent... THAT is the mark of good character.

Well done.
It might save you a lot of trouble if you were to think about what you're saying before you say it. I don't think it would hurt the pacing of the show too much.

While you're at it, try listening to what your guests are saying before you interrupt them with the next question.
We love you, your fair your tough but your honest. hey at least your not o'reilly. he's an idiot and a lier. Like do they really think that the american people are that stupid? mispelling letters on there programs so people can read them incorrect, putting democrat under republicans subtitle, they do all kinds of bogus stuff on there. Losers. i hate fox
Chris, when I heard you on the "Morning Joe" show last week, my jaw dropped.  I replayed your comments a few times to make sure I heard you correctly.  I was stunned.  

However, anyone that knows you, knows that you are sometimes a bit crass and not exactly politcally correct in your observations.  An admirable quality these days.  I knew then and know now that you meant no malice or harm of any kind to Mrs. Clinton, women or your viewing audience.  

Tonight's apology was not necessary for the vast majority of us, we trust and admire your candor.  

Thank you for 10 years of "Hardball"!
RE: THIS POSTED BY KATHY RICHARDSON

Chris, I appreciate your sincerity, honesty & enthusiasm...always enjoy your show with lots of insight & truth.  Please do not go overboard now with your guilt (or please, don't tell me Bill Clinton is pressuring you, too?  His statement that the press was unfair to Hillary seemed incongruent with what I saw happening)and give her more breaks than Obama.  I was really disappointed in your enthusiastic declaration that Clinton "won" the debate & neutralized Obama & Edwards.  I hope as you analize it closer, you will see that it is Obama who always takes the high road (forgiving Clinton & her campaign for the continual unwarrented attacks; MSNBC had an excellent summary of the "racial" events, which were totally Clinton's doing), is honest (his acknowledged "weakness", which obviously has not interfered with his ability to build the best organized campaign from scratch ever seen!), is equally knowlegable & "experienced" as Clinton and is "Presidential"(an inspirational leader, intelligent, high level of integrity).  He is more consistant on his positions and doesn't take PAC money like Clinton (why did Brian decide at the last minute not to allow Edwards to ask his question about pharmaceutical lobbyist money to Clinton as well? And then Brian very rudely refused to acknowledge that Obama had a question he was not allowed to ask a candidate...so Clinton had NO questions asked of her!!) And Bill Clinton wants to accuse the media of not treating Hillary fairly?  The Clintons represent the politics of the past...the good ole boy  (girl)favors, money, negative campaigning, corruption and half truths.  Has everyone forgotten that Bill Clinton LIED to the American people?  How can people trust him?  In Iowa, we had a long time to get to know the candidates and their campaigns up close & personal.  We got it right in Iowa...Obama will lead us to the promised land (if we all work hard!)...he is the real deal...let's not let this truly unique leader go. Please give him a fair shake!!!! He's trying to lead us on a new path & is up against great odds as he tries to beat the corporate Clinton machine.

MY REPLY:

The Clintons were the first black people in office. Im sure there were alot of people who didn't like the fact that they stood up for the minority and set up programs and laws to protect the black american. Im sure these are the same people who are now calling The Clintons Racist!!??? Look, this is not about who speaks the best who walks talk!!!as it is about getting the job done!!!! I'd rather someone lie to me about his personal life than lie to me about something else thats killing thousands of innocent people. No one died because of what bill clinton did. Oh and, there is no promise land. and it sure isn't going to come in 8yrs. not after all the mess the texan left for us to clean up..
We love you, your fair your tough but your honest. hey at least your not o'reilly. he's an idiot and a lier. Like do they really think that the american people are that stupid? mispelling letters on there programs so people can read them incorrect, putting democrat under republicans subtitle, they do all kinds of bogus stuff on there. Losers. i hate fox
Chris,

   Help me understand why you and major media outlets
champion McCain as this Big war hero over being shot down over 40 years ago, but are so against the war in Iraq and haven't heard one person in the war in Iraqi
being a called a hero by you or Msnbc. Why is this?
 Since I know you will not have the courage to answer this question, let me propose that both McCain and the
Gulf War & Afganistan vets are heros and you will proclaim that, or that neither groups are. Just seems
logical, unless the constant derision of the war in Iraqi and Bush and the glorification of McCain has some Political devise. This position you take makes
you look very phoney & dishonest.
Despite your explanation it's quite clear to me and many others that you do not like Senator Clinton. Sadly my interpretation is that her gender is an issue with you. My experience tells me that people who blurt out words for which they then have to backtrack usually embrace the under lying precepts. This is a matter to which you should give considerable introspective thought.
Chris,
Everyone watches your program knows that you are Sen Obama's supporter. I like Barak too. But that say be carefull what you are wishing for. Within the primary no one can't really play nasty, when comes to general election, Sen Obama will be teared apart by the other side. And to think that he will be able to unite this country when he becomes the presidnet, that's just laughable. he's pro-guy, pro-life, wants to tax richer more for the economic issues, supports giving ID to illigal immigrants, on and on on many social issues ..., get reality check, people.

And to African Americans, if you think that Sen Obama will help your community more than John or Hillary will do, you may want to think hard and through, I bet he will kick you out of the bus in a hurry, just ask youself - when was he on your side? I guess you may say that you all will be very proud of him being the first African American president, that I can see that, I will be happy too. However at the end of the day, you still need to pay your bill, and hopefully you will still have a job.

One last thing, Chris, respect and fairness is the minimum requirement for a journalist, please don't lose side of that!
This whole mea-culpa from Matthews, is a whitewash. Matthews has consistently said derogatory and sixist things regarding Hillary Clinton, all while attempting to build up his personal "favorites" Barack Obama and Rudy Giuliani...it's disgracefull. Chris Matthews isn't fooling anyone. Matthews has long been a political hack. He is a over-blown, over-stuffed, anti Clinton "zealot", who wouldn't know REAL politics if it fell on him. Matthews cowardly bias and attacks on Hillary, backfired in NH, and he and MSNBC were left looking the fool...hardly a new experience for Mr. Matthews. Matthews does not have the courage to admit his bias and sexisim, he instead uses a "blog" article to try and "spin" it. Cowardice is cowardice, and Chris Matthews is one of the biggest cowards in the buisness.
Hello Chris. I confess that I had never liked you and could barely watch a few minutes of your show. I did not know what you had said about Hillary Clinton, but I knew that it must have been bad, as I heard talk of it on other news networks. Tonight, however, I saw your show and heard your statements explaining what you had said about Clinton. I must say that I was very impressed and it has given me a different outlook about you. I have become a political news junkie and from now on I will try to watch your show whenever possible. Thank you for explaining how you feel.
Chris,
Do not forget that one strength of the Clintons is to piss off their critics so hard that they cross the line and they can then portray themselves as victims.  It worked for Gingrich and for the Republicans during the impeachment saga.  They are trying to make it work for tough-love critics like yourself and others.  Do not fall for it.  Keep it measured.

The 10th anniversary of the Lewinsky saga is around the corner, and Democrats should be reminded of what Bill Clinton (about to be handed a 3rd term) did to bring it upon himself and stall reforms that would have served the country well.  Thank you for the irreplaceable role you are playing.

DCH


Chris,
Everyone watches your program knows that you are Sen Obama's supporter. I like Barak too. But that say be carefull what you are wishing for. Within the primary no one can't really play nasty, when comes to general election, Sen Obama will be teared apart by the other side. And to think that he will be able to unite this country when he becomes the presidnet, that's just laughable. he's pro-guy, pro-life, wants to tax richer more for the economic issues, supports giving ID to illigal immigrants, on and on on many social issues ..., get reality check, people.

And to African Americans, if you think that Sen Obama will help your community more than John or Hillary will do, you may want to think hard and through, I bet he will kick you out of the bus in a hurry, just ask youself - when was he on your side? I guess you may say that you all will be very proud of him being the first African American president, that I can see that, I will be happy too. However at the end of the day, you still need to pay your bill, and hopefully you will still have a job.

One last thing, Chris, respect and fairness is the minimum requirement for a journalist, please don't lose side of that!
Dear Chris,

Thank you so much for your comment regarding Hillary Clinton.  I watch your show daily and watch Morning Joe when I can.  I was taken aback when you had made the original statement and was offended.  Senator Clinton is an intelligent, accomplished woman who has worked hard and overcome a lot of adversity and kept her family together.  She is the first woman candidate with a real chance to win the nomination and the presidency and I do believe she is qualified and will be ready on day one.  Your comment had been dismissive of her accomplishments, and I appreciate you recognizing that.  Again, thank you for addressing the issue, and I look forward to following the campaigns on your show, and I hope Hillary wins it all.  I also hope MSNBC returns to XM radio - I miss it!

I appreciated this.  I thought you were disrespectful in the original morning Joe piece, and this column rescues your show for me.  I like your show, and I don't like similar shows on Fox, because you know how to get tough without stooping low.  
In this election season, you are missing the unique power of a woman candidate to transform her family and her community in ways different from men.  We have not seen this aspect of power in the presidency yet, but we might eh?  Perhaps you might ask what Golda Meir did in Israel, or Margaret Thatcher in Britain.  There is a quality which is different and engaging and it came out from Hillary Clinton for the first time in New Hampshire, when she finally lost her fear of revealing her own personality.  I have observed Hillary Clinton making women proud - smiling inside.  Powerful stuff.

And thank you for your mea culpa.  It was due.
Hillary may have proven herself as a great politician, but that's not necessarily a good thing.  I would like to see again the televised interview  in which Hillary made a comment about not being, as I recall, 'some little stand by your man' woman.  The heck she wasn't - at least publicly.  While I realize that she was in a wretched situation, I continue to believe that Hillary's public position for years - even before Bill Clinton became President, further enabled him, leading up to the vulgar events which became so exhaustingly public.

I also think that Hillary has always had her eye on the future and being, I've read, every bit as smart as her Rhodes Scholar husband, had a long-term ambition to run for office.  Her stand regarding her husband's behavior had to be such that it wouldn't destroy her own political possibilities.

Regarding her comments that she never doubted Bill loved her - oh, my.  If she "never" doubted him, maybe she's not as smart as I have been led to believe.  Or not as honest as she would like us to believe.  
In all honesty, I don't think you should have apologized.  I listened to your reasons and I think you were right on target.  Clinton certainly wasn't elected to the U.S. Senate in New York for her experience.  She is a political animal and New York was the perfect venue to establish herself.  A carpetbagger with an agenda.
In scrolling through the points made by many posters, I sense a "holier than Thou" attitude. Anyone who has watched "Hardball" should see that no one is safe- and that is how it should be.

This blog, and this issue, is being blown beyond proportion. In analyzing politics, the whys and hows of things may not be all that pretty. It's hard denying that Hillary may have used the '98 situation as a set-up for post-White House life. And so what? She made a bad situation into a positive start for herself. I say Chris Matthews was not out of line in his remarks. Continue the good work.
Chris,
I watch your show every day and have great respect for you and your panels of analysts.  Lately, however, I have been very perturbed by the constant negative drumbeat of your somewhat personal attacks on Hillary and coronation of Barack.  I need you to get back to the hard hitting analysis of ALL candidates, including Barack  and Rudy who you have treated with kid gloves. I watched with sadness as you dismissed the significance of the female vote in new Hampshire and was disappointed that in an effort to explain away what happened in NH and why all the pundits and pollsters were wrong, you, in effect, nullified the message of NH voters.
I can tell you live and breathe and love politics as I do, but I don't want to feel so uncomfortable watching your show that I have to turn to CNN for political analysis!  Get back to yourself, Chris. Your self-examination has made me proud.
P.S. Your best guys are Pat Buchanan and Chuck Todd.  They rock!
It's always comical to see liberals eat each other-- like the demons in The Screwtape Letters.  Chris Matthews deserves what he gets, in this case a humiliating dose of speech-quenching left wing fascism.  Maybe now he'll realize what a mistake he's made, throwing in with this crowd.  They will do whatever it takes to maintain their power, including tossing a faithful Democrat like him right over the side of the boat, if he in any way deigns to step out of line by excercising his rights.  Lots more I could say, suffice it say you reap what you sow.
Chris - I have been so angry since your initial comments about Hillary that I had hoped the network would ban you from covering the big stories in the future.  It is one thing for guests to agree to come on your show, which I watch regularly, and take whatever comments you throw them. But it is another to be covering the news - the day before the vote in New hampshire - the day after the vote,etc. - and to inject such biases, and frankly what seemed like hatred of women. I can't imagine you want it to sound this way, but it seems so clear that you don't like Hillary, and not because of her views or ideologies - but because she is a woman trying to be in the game that it is ok for men to be in.  Your comments rallied women voters in New Hampshire.  They rallied me. I am looking forward to getting to cast my vote for Hillary on super Tuesday.
Chirs:  Once, I actually thought that you were the best newspaper writer in the country.  Then, I though you were the best TV guy. This Hill thing has changed all of that.  It isn't what you said on Morning Joe.  It is all the things you have said about her over the course of this cycle. you hit her every night. Who can best lead us through this mess? She is not my prime choice. That would be Mack as we need a hero now more than ever.  She would be second.  You really turn me off to the point where I turn you off.  You have learned how to use TV; the inflections, the eyes, etc. At times I have given you a pass, thinking you must know something we don't but that is silly because she has been vetted for 30 years.  Please stop.
Not buying it. This is more political hogwash. It wasn't just what you said on MOrning Joe - in fact what you said on that show was merely a continuation of your spew of hatred towards HRC. While you harbor such a strong dislike for the Clintons is your business - but it becomes OUR business when you continually allow that dislike to color and shape whatever political commentary you may have to make.  Go back to Journalism 101 & learn about objectivity.
 I have been listening to alot of the election coverages and it is nothing but apparent that most if not all of the comentators that are suppost to be giving us facts, to help us make good decisions are doing nothing but giving their bias opinions.  I realize every story has two sides but it doesn't take long to listen to any of you to figure out who's sides you are on.  What happened to giving us just the truth and letting us make up our minds instead of all of you telling us how we should feel.  Your bias shows big time.  I remember when I first started following the news that I was told to only believe about 1/2 of what I read or heard, now I think I am about down to believing about 1/8th or nothing.  The news no longer seems to have anything to do with the truth just the opinions of the news giver.  Its sad because we should be able to rely on you. I watch the news to get informed not entertained.  
Chris

Keep on doing what you do. I don't consider myself a fan, but I fully support your right to express an heartfelt opinion.

For those self-righteous, disingenuous, politically correct, intellectual lightweights who oppose your views on Bush, Cheney or Hillary -

Why don't you change the channel? Sounds like you prefer meaningless mumbo jumbo like 'my greatest weakness is that I am impatient' (Hillary Clinton at the Nevada debate) or 'I did not inhale'. Please, you bunch are pathetic. Stop whining and get a life.
Chris, You will from this point forward always, in my book, be a putz.
Chris,
Being PC really stinks sometimes doesn't it.

You were right.  You had an opinion.  It was yours to openly express and MSNBC pays you well for your opinions.

However, the forum you and other "forward thinkers" move in does not allow for that.  To break stride get you a backhand from all the people you previously held close as those who were just like you.

Women, just like men in the political forefront have attained their power unjustly.  In Hillary's case, she has a long documented record of behaving unjustly.  She doesn't need Bill's bad behavior to justify it. She just doesn't get called on it enough.

This message will get filtered.

Mathews problem is not with "Clinton", it is with women and extreme sexist towards them.

It is not a single event, it is a history to sexist behavior towards co-host and guest on the show.

Fortunate for him, the sexist remark was made toward a white women, otherwise he would have faced "Imus" fate.

He should face Imus' fate.  He is unacceptable on a respectable network
Chris has never had a problem distorting facts, telling half truths and making biased opinions about Republican politicians. He says he loves politics and politicans, but only if they are liberal Democrats. If you want to ask a hardball question, how about this one. Would Hillary have ever gotten elected to anything if she wasn't Monica Lowenskies boyfriends wife? Time to change the name of the show from Hardball to Rolls over like a dog.
Hi Chris -
Most of the time I really enjoy your show, but I've
noticed several times your tendency to border on dis-
respect toward women, and especially Hillary.  I
think she's the best thing we've got going right now
in this country.  After what Bush (and let's be
honest, most of the other MALE presidents have put
us through) it's right that a woman should have the
job.  She's qualified, smart, experienced and yes,
Presidential.  I am not voting for her because she's
a woman, but because she's all of the things I just
mentioned.  You are mostly a breath of fresh air
Chris - I never watched "talking heads" until I
started watching you.  And now I'm hooked!  But be
fair, be aware, and listen more!  You constantly
interrupt people when you've asked them a question -
I'd really like to hear them answer it.  Thanks
for listening - you're a really good guy.  (By the
way, what was that s__t-eatin' grin you had on your
face when Hillary patted your cheek and you hugged
her!  You looked like a little boy who'd gotten
praise from his favorite teacher!  Kind of endearing,
actually!
I have been very annoyed and angry with all of the harsh treatment of Hillary Clinton in the media but especially Chris Matthews as she does not deserve it.  Hillary is a very intelligent and hardworking individual.  She did after all finish first in her Law School class at Yale.  People thought she could not win when she ran for Senator in New York but she did and then won reelection with 67% of the votes.  She should not be attacked for something that her husband did.  Instead she should be admired for how she conducted herself during this situation.  Also, the special prosecutor Ken Starr wasted over $70 million dollars of taxpayer money investigating the Clintons over Whitewater and came up with absolutely nothing.  (Why isn't there a special prosecutor investigating Bush and his administration for all of the crimes they have done?)  So there is nothing in her background for her to be attacked on or criticized.  If it wasn't for the attack dogs of the Republican mean machine I'm sure people would stop thinking of her as being a polarizing unlikeable figure.  People who know her personally describe her as a warm and very likeable person who is also very intelligent.  I think she would be a great President.  I also have reason to believe that Chris and NBC received many emails from women complaining about his treatment of Hillary and other females and that was the reason for this explanation but I don't see him saying "sorry".
Mr Matthews: it is clear that you were right the first time. Hillary, whatever her strengths and weaknesses, does indeed play the gender card, while denying the same. The PC folks got to you. Truth is the casualty.  
Chris,
No apology was necessary other than to salve Senator Clinton's supporters and allow Steve Capus to put his Tums back inside his desk drawer.  It's obvious that the much vaunted Clinton machine is poised to frame any comment they dislike, in terms of victimhood and rouse special interest groups to do their bidding (ie Bob Johnson, Gloria S, NOW, etc).  It is precisely this slickness that needs to be exposed.  Since Senator Clinton seems to be running on the value of her experience on 'day one' someone has the right to question how valued her experience really is if she was  a) at best a witness to history as a first lady and  b) if she had no idea what President Clinton was up to with Monica, right within her own household.  Mr. Obama unfortunately has to run against not only Mrs Clinton, but her husband, who seems to have the dual mission of running Senator Clinton's campaign and correcting his 8 yr record.  I hope you can find a palpable way to explore the value of her experience and what it's like to campaign against President and Senator Clinton simultaneously.
Chris, given the multitude of your indiscretions and your Imus-like moments about women, your statement was inadequate.  Buddy, you just don’t get it.

I tape and watch your show Monday - Friday and on Sunday.  These are some of my complaints that I have personally noted:

You have made stupid comments about women.  On one occasion you diminished the intellect and professionalism of a female guest by visually grimacing, rolling your eyes, and remarking on how you were so taken by her beauty.  It did not belong on the air.  I was glad the camera was limited to your face.  You acted like a 14 year old boy about to lose it.  This was unprofessional and incredibly immature.    

Your treatment of Former First Lady, current U.S. Senator, and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been an insult to the American electoral process.

The portrait of Hillary you repeatedly use is cartoonish and insipid.

The camera shots of you and your up-close and personal hand to face Hillary moment had you in the foreground, enlarged out of perspective, and with Hillary shrunken/ diminutive/ liliputian in the background.  The shot summarized your inflated ego and your diminution of and lack of respect for Senator Clinton.

Your comparison of Senator Clinton to “Nurse Ratchet.”

Your Dec 17th questioning if Hillary supporters were castrated in her service.

Your asking on Nov 17th whether Senator Clinton was a “She Devil,” picturing Senator Clinton with Devil Horns, and asking about “demonizing” Hillary.  If this wasn’t an Imus moment, then what is?

Your statement that Hillary was on a short leash suggested Hillary was a female dog and subservient to a male master.

Yeah, “life is a campaign” and you are no better than those playing dirty politics on war hero and  statesmen Senator John McCain.

You are the Imus of MSNBC.  You are not much better than O’Reilly and no less a blow-hard.  You need to straighten up or spend some time in the penalty box.

Bob G in Chicago, January 18, 2008
Well-done, Chris! As a loyal fan of your show, I'd become increasingly put off by the rhetoric Hillary had been taking - not for major political gaffes, but (it appeared) more for "just existing" as a female candidate. This I didn't understand. I wrote a letter, never expecting a reply... so I was taken aback by your commentary this morning (I am in Saudi Arabia, and we receive your show the next morning)...Thank you for replying to all of us who admire you greatly, yet needed to voice our concern. You listened, and that is enough.  By the way, we love your show way over here!
I have always been a fan of yours, Chris, prior to your venomous, unwarranted, attacks on Hillary Clinton.  Unfortunately, your newly found bitterness is reflected on your show; I can no longer support you.  Follow your heart, Chris, and stop listening to your brothers; you're much smarter than they.
I like your show and I watch it everyday. You said exactly what I felt about Hillary, and I hope that the Clintons did not coerce you into explaining or recanting what you said about her because you were right!

Chris, Chris, Chris...can you have a show called hardball when you are wearing panties. As a conservative I watch you because you have no clue on how us in the red states think. Your show is like a bunch of limo-liberals on the upper west side discussing the back wood cretins that are in the fly over states. However, I did give you credit for being tough and sometimes coming down hard on your side..and not being PC. With Ms. Clinton however you have shown you are just an upper west side wuzz like the rest of the MSM. This is why Comedy Center fake newscast is as enjoyable as other news outlets. CC doesn't fool themselves into thinking they are journalist!
I am a registered Democrat, an avid Hardball fan, and, frankly, would be happy with any of the three Democrats that are running.  I do feel, however, that your bias against Hillary Clinton, and conversely, your very positive feelings about Senator Obama and your lesser feelings, although positive, about John Edwards, come to the surface more than they should as a journalist.  I do not recall any negative feelings about either Edwards or Obama ever being voiced by you, but it's very difficult for you to say positive things about Senator Clinton.  I too feel you have a good heart, and you are certainly entitled to your opinions off of the air, but not on it. AG, Tampa, Florida
I feel like the Clintons have really scared you to death.  It was apparent when you went way over the top after the debate in declaring "Shrillery" the winner.  I couldn't beleive it - neither could Hillary supporters.  WOW - talk about over-compensating.  Don't let the Clintons threathen you.
Chris is just trying to keep his job.That's all there is to it.He is a Clinton haterand disrespects women by making snide remarks.He should be removed from the air.I hope Keith does not act like that loser Chris.Norah O'Donnell,Mika and Joe are all haters.Chris Matthews should be fired.suppose someone makes the same remarks about his wife,is he gonna like it?.please make sure my comments are posted.
I was unaware of Chris's latest controversial comments about Hillary and his subsequent explanation until now.  Why?  Because after years of faithful viewing, I finally turned the channel because of his nastiness towards some of the politicians, especially the Clintons and Hillary in particular.  I am happy that I'll be able to tune him in again.
The only person on MSNBC that appears to more full of himself than you is your cohort David Schuster. You two will probably congratulate each other if you read this.

Those that live by the sword . . .
I saw your first comment and I listened to your commentary last night- what apology and why? If anyone actually thinks back to the days when Clinton lied about the definition of "is" ( and before everyone gets on my bandwagon I will tell you that I voted for President Clinton TWICE!), the country rallied around Hillary and admired her for sticking with her marraige ( which I can't say I would have done). She became a much more public figure than the First Lady in the background. The whole cheating/lying episode did thrust her into the public eye, more than before. Everyone watched as she, Chelsea, and Bill walked to/from the helicopter, across the lawn, she on the one side and he on the other, with Chelsea in the middle. We felt her pain and anger at what he had done. When she got up and pulled herself up by her bootstraps in NY, people rallied to support her again. Yes, she has proven a worthy Senator for New York, but Chris, you were right on in your observations of what had taken place then and how those events catapulted her to the spotlight of political office. Chris, you have a historial perspective and insight not seen in many political analyists. You ask probing questions ( your focus on the flop of yellow cake and subsequent lying by Scooter Libby was right on) and I would urge you not to change your approach. You manage to stimulate diaglogue which is imperitive in our country today so that our citizens make better choices for the future of our country.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=586241


Syndicate This Site

Add Hardblogger to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google