<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx</link><description>This Thursday, my colleague Brian Williams moderates the first Democratic presidential debate for 2008 at South Carolina State University.I’m looking forward to the event because it will be the first opportunity for everyone, including me, to see a number</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#166932</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:29:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:166932</guid><dc:creator>Bruce M MacDonald Adams, Mass.</dc:creator><description>  is it true an american president be able to start
world ending thermonuclear war to be elected?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167044</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:26:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167044</guid><dc:creator>Robert Henry, Marion, South Carolina</dc:creator><description>The question that I would like asked is: The current administration has put most American's trust in Government in serious question.  If elected to the Presidency, how do you plan on renewing the American peoples trust in their government?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167061</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:38:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167061</guid><dc:creator>Tony Jenson, Palm Springs, CA</dc:creator><description>I want to know what their criteria will be for appointments? Specifically, Attorney General, Homeland Security and Secretary of State.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167063</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:40:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167063</guid><dc:creator>Stewart Resmer</dc:creator><description>Joe Biden is the candidate with the most to gain in this debate. He is very experienced with his years in service. He speaks from the heart, and he knows the hopes and aspirations of a great deal of Americans and he knows the anguish of personal loss and family tragedy.
His proposal to partition Iraq is sound albeit contoversial. He has bee right on the war in many instances and speaks forcefully to that end.
But he remains  the bottom echelons of the list when it comes to fund raising, which begs the question even Chris has asked, is it the money?
Biden remains commited, dedicated and driven to see the convention floor, win lose or draw, the debaye is yet another shot to stay in the hunt.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167070</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:42:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167070</guid><dc:creator>Joan F. Grenzer, Parkville, Maryland</dc:creator><description>My debate question is: Should a candidate  return a campaign donation that comes from a rapper who has made racial and/or ethnic slurs against a group?    </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167076</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:45:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167076</guid><dc:creator>M. Eppler, Irvine, CA</dc:creator><description>Please ask Gov. Richardson to justify his racist remark that his support of Gonzales (AG) is based on the fact that he has a Hispanic background.  Further, the entire panel should be queried as to how they intend to handle the hypocricy in race relations (blacks allowed to use the "N" word etc., but a poison pill if uttered by anyone else, advocacy to not cooperate with police on criminal investigations, etc.). What kind of society do they envision with these issues so mainstreamed? 

Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167077</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:45:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167077</guid><dc:creator>Paul Hecht, Medford, New York</dc:creator><description>Please ask the following question in some form:  Many of the scandals of the Bush Administration are due to his appointment of unqualified and incompetent cronies, friends, and financial backers.  Would each of you pledge to search for and appoint only the most qualified people for the positions within your administration ?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167078</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:46:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167078</guid><dc:creator>Joan F. Grenzer, Parkville, Maryland</dc:creator><description>My debate question is: Should a candidate  return a campaign donation that comes from a rapper who has made racial and/or ethnic slurs against a group?    </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167086</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:50:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167086</guid><dc:creator>Jane A. Malys-Hazi, Apex, NC</dc:creator><description>I want to hear what the candidates have to say about the state of our economy and budget deficit...according to the US Gov't Comptroller who was on TV interviews a couple weeks ago--Healthcare-Medicare/Medicaid,Social Security, etc are in such serious trouble that it will take 20 years to see positive results- IF we start now!!  So the question is--what and when will SERIOUS moves be made to address this?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167091</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:52:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167091</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Swenson , Seattle , Wa. </dc:creator><description>We keep hearing about constitutional amendments for flag burning and gay marriage.These are emotional issues but not dangerous to the US democracy.This presidential campaing is going to cost hundreds of millions of dollars .How about a amendment for campaing finance reform , get the special interest out of our elections</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167096</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:55:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167096</guid><dc:creator>Richard Heinzman</dc:creator><description>Polls regularly show that Americans' dissatisfaction with congress is even greater than that of the executive branch.  How do you propose to prompt Congress to improve it's performance and use its time to benefit the American people, rather than attacking their peers for their own transitory political purposes?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167121</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:20:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167121</guid><dc:creator>Sue H, Olympia, WA</dc:creator><description>The question I would like to ask is: What will you do to bring our troops home from Iraq?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167127</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:27:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167127</guid><dc:creator>Stacy Stark, Chino Hills, Ca</dc:creator><description>There are many people in this country who's income exceeds state limits for help with medical insurance but who's income is not enough to afford medical insurace thus leaving many uninsured. I would like to know what, if any of the canidates have a plan for an affordable universal health care plan? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167128</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:28:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167128</guid><dc:creator>ira goldman  dallas texas</dc:creator><description>what will you do to get this country straightend out
we are like a second rate country,its a shame a country like ours have to endure this problem,doesnt any body tell the truth anymore.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167135</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:31:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167135</guid><dc:creator>Sarah, Portsmouth, N.H.</dc:creator><description>Do you think the current administration in Iraq can succeed in bringing about a political solution for the country and if not,is there anything that the United States can do to end the country's civil war.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167142</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:38:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167142</guid><dc:creator>Gerri Michalska</dc:creator><description>To Senator Dodd:  I watched a recent NOW program on PBS recently which dealt with the problem of hedge fund corruption and  an investigation by an SEC lawyer into a hedge fund high up which was not only nixed but the SEC lawyer ws then fired.  (corruption and "justice" in the U.S.)
In response to that Senator Grassley wrote up an amendment but then we hear that it was deep sixed by Senator Dodd.  Why Senator Dodd, Why?  Why are you covering up instead of seeking to uncover?  Why are you seeking your own selfish vested interests instead of the common good and transparency in the Us gov.?  Why?  Do you care more about protecting special interest groups who fund your campaign than doing the right thing for the American people??</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167152</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:48:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167152</guid><dc:creator>Gary Lobaugh warsaw, MO</dc:creator><description>The question that I would like asked is:  Do you
believe that every death of an American soldier
in Iraq is now on President Bush's head?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167156</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167156</guid><dc:creator>Sean, Torrington CT</dc:creator><description>Great question Robert.  

I'd also like to ask them: The United States; aggressive and manipulative foreign policy over the last several years has created much discontent arround the world, what would you do to regain the respect our country once had?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167239</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:04:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167239</guid><dc:creator>EE</dc:creator><description>I will like to ask how will you do to win christian votes. Or do you at all need christian votes?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167243</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:06:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167243</guid><dc:creator>priscela</dc:creator><description>hilary has to watch obama sarcasm and being critical person- critical to ohters.hes a good talker no substance.wartch out hillary.hope bill clinton will attend the debate.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167245</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:10:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167245</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Dunkirk, NY</dc:creator><description>It will be interesting because Hillary has shortcomings when it comes to the campaign trail, she doesn't come close to her husbands skills.  It will be an opportunity for the nation to see Obama in action, the last time was in 2004.  People like Todd, Biden, and Richardson can also become more known, although Richardson may have the best credentials of any of the current candidates.  Even though millions have been raised by the front runners, it is good that all candidates get this shot early because we deserve the chance to hear all voices, not just those with the most money in the bank.    </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167248</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:12:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167248</guid><dc:creator>Brian, Staten Island, NY</dc:creator><description>In terms of free speech, in public, in newspapers, on television, or on the radio, many believe it is better to allow one stupid person to freely say something stupid, and at the same time allow the rest of the world to criticize that person for saying it, rather than not allow a person to speak there mind at all.  Would you agree with this view of free speech?

</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167250</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:13:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167250</guid><dc:creator>angie, tampa, fl</dc:creator><description>The question I would like to ask is: Do you think that if we retreat from Iraq that everything will be fine and that the terrorists will leave us alone... Do they really believe that? Because if something does happen, in the United States, from those same terrorists will they blame President Bush or themselves?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167251</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167251</guid><dc:creator>Brian, Staten Island, NY</dc:creator><description>What are the major issues that most separate democrats and republicans, liberals, and conservatives, and where do you stand on those issues?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167256</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:16:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167256</guid><dc:creator>John G. Rumple, Indianapolis, IN</dc:creator><description>I would like this question to be asked during this debate: What one principle so clearly guides you as a leader that history will look back and view your presidency as making America and the world a more civilized place to live?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167258</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167258</guid><dc:creator>Ruth Jameson  Eureka CA 95501</dc:creator><description>My question of each candidate: Define “our National Interests in Iraq”.  As used by this administration and as you would define it. And if there is more than one, prioritize what you believe to be the most important.  Part Two: Do you believe that Oil is part of our “National Interest” and do you think that it should be a reason for us to be in Iraq? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167264</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:26:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167264</guid><dc:creator>Karen Strickland, Crosland GA</dc:creator><description>If elected President, what are you going to do about
the rising cost of gasoline?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167265</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:28:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167265</guid><dc:creator>Virginia Fippinger, Sarasota, Florida</dc:creator><description>I want to know from each candidate, " If you were to wake up tomorrow 4/27/07; as the President of the United States, what would your first action in office be"?
No Pun's please!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167266</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:29:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167266</guid><dc:creator>Kim Berry, Luttrell, TN</dc:creator><description>Since "going green" seems to be the new thing to do, how would you tackle the topic of alternative fuel and protecting the Earth?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167272</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:33:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167272</guid><dc:creator>L'Nore Kotulski, Bethlehem, PA</dc:creator><description>Why do the Democrats continue to support ammnesty for illegal aliens when they know it will economically destroy the American middle class and their American Dream?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167275</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:35:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167275</guid><dc:creator>Kim Berry, Luttrell, Tn</dc:creator><description>If elected President, how would each of you go about trying to repair some of the friction between the US and other foreign countries?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167285</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:43:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167285</guid><dc:creator>Terri, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>How can we restore America's image as a country of benevolence, honor and character in the world?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167290</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:46:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167290</guid><dc:creator>Catherine Kitcho, Laguna Niguel, California</dc:creator><description>We the people have seen our constitutional rights eroded and corrupted over the last 6 years. If elected, what will you do to get our rights back? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167308</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:56:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167308</guid><dc:creator>wilfred martinez    little falls  new jersey</dc:creator><description>mrs.clinton:please answer this. as a vietnam veteran i understand what our troops are going through, but what i  do not understand is why the pulling of our troops is the answer to stop the killing in iraq. if 
we do pull our troops out, the lives wil be lost again of our troops. the outcome of this solution will be the same as vitnam and iraq and all the surrounding countries will suffer along with us for letting this be done.why must we leave when soldiers do know what their purpose for being there is and the
politians as yourself and the panel cannot understand. please clear this for me with how and what you think the outcome will be</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167317</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:03:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167317</guid><dc:creator>vincent hailey phila pa 19143 </dc:creator><description>why don,nt we think for a minuit if we can keep giving them i think now 500billion dallars why can.nt we just one time give each of our states one billion dollars man        for all our programs. that would what we would call taking care of our own first can you just imagine how we might put it to use</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167620</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:39:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167620</guid><dc:creator>Win Hinkle, Germantown, MD</dc:creator><description>Interesting that the headline said you "would" pick a winner but you say you "could." You must have the same editor that changed Rudy Giuliani speech in Manchester, NH yesterday to the soundbite, "Rudy says that if Dems win the US is likely to experience another attack many times greater than 9/11." This was on your station MSNBC this morning at 6:05 AM. How do you feel about these exaggerations, Chris? I'll be watching this afternoon to see if you have the guts to answer. 
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167621</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:40:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167621</guid><dc:creator>Glenn, Killingly, CT</dc:creator><description>Many Americans knew from the very beginning that invading Iraq was a mistake.  I would like to ask the candidates who voted to give President Bush the authority to invade Iraq to justify their trust in him.  Half of the American people were insightful enough to know the war in Iraq was ill-conceived, and many democrats (myself included) expect a leader with at least as much insight as most of the citizens.  Without saying "knowing then what I know now..." or "we were misled into war by an incompetent president..." or "the administration cherry-picked the intelegence..." (we've already heard all of that rhetoric) please justify your vote which helped allow this to happen.  The democrats who voted for this war are as much to blame as the republicans who have executed this fiasco.  I suppose this question would be directed to Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and Joe Biden.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167625</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:51:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167625</guid><dc:creator>samuel f. reynolds, bethany, oklahoma</dc:creator><description>Questions for candidates: Would President Bush's proposed "war czar" office be authorized because of the emergency powers allowed by the Constitution during wartime? Since we're always at war, wouldn't it become a permanent office -- beyond anyone's control, even the President's?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167670</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167670</guid><dc:creator>Shannon Fuller Winston-Salem, NC</dc:creator><description>A question that could win my vote: Will you seek to repeal the Patriot Act and place addtional protections against the abuse of power, therefore protecting American's civil liberties.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167684</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:48:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167684</guid><dc:creator>Larry Kimmons, Jackson, Ms.</dc:creator><description>My question for each candidate: What will you do about illigal's in this country, and the ones trying to get in ?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167787</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:03:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167787</guid><dc:creator>Mo Demers, Epsom, NH</dc:creator><description>It must be agreed that global warming is no longer an issue to be denied or ignored.  Although the scientific community publishes report after report, the politicians continue to argue the semantics within these reports.  Isn't it reasonable to take agressive action to persue all possible renewable, non-polluting energy sources?  On the foreign policy platform, we sever our dependance on foreign fuel sources and on the ecological platform, we secure the survival of the human race.  What are your plans to address this prodigious issue?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167792</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:06:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167792</guid><dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator><description>I'll be watching just to hear Dennis Kucinich for the few moments he'll get to speak.  He is honest, direct , and is the only candidate with a true progressive vision for the future of this country.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167800</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:11:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167800</guid><dc:creator>Glenn, Killingly, CT</dc:creator><description>What does "victory in Iraq" mean?  As you see it, who is the enemy and how will we know we have "won".</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167818</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:25:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167818</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Trujillo, Albuquerque, New Mexico</dc:creator><description>What I want to know is, what are the candidates views on same sex marrage? and their outlook on equality, and hate crimes?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167819</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:25:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167819</guid><dc:creator>Barbara Stoehr, Oneonta, New York</dc:creator><description>Given the numerous challenges the next president is going to have to face in all areas impacting our country and the American people this is the question I would like answered. What personal quality do you possess that will enable you to be successful in meeting those challenges? Please give evidence of such quality in your answer.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167858</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167858</guid><dc:creator>Gilbert, Albuquerque, NM</dc:creator><description>My question is regarding education. Gov. Richardson my kids attend Albuquerque Public Schools and the Westside(Ventana Ranch Elementary) is over capacity at the elementary and middle schools. If your Sec. of Education can't relieve these issues how are you going to fix our National Education System? I am very disappointed with the progress our state is making.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167871</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167871</guid><dc:creator>Jason, Dallas, Tx</dc:creator><description>My question: After 8 years of bush's failed "cooperation in government" what will you do to increase bipartisianship in congress and help move america forward by doing something about the issues we really care about instead of those that YOU care about?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167873</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167873</guid><dc:creator>me myself and I</dc:creator><description>I would ask what the candidates' plans are for the withdrawal from Iraq in terms of minimizing casualties to American troops and creating a framework for political and social settlement among Iraqi factions, as well as their military rebuilding plans in order to rest and recover American military resources so that we might be able to prevent futher terrorist attacks or respond to nations that support, aid and abet terrorist organizations.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167882</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:01:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167882</guid><dc:creator>Richard Terrell</dc:creator><description>Re: Iraq. A question for the debate.  Since Turkey, Syria and Iran have historically vehemently opposed an independent Kurdish state and since Shi'ites and Sunnis both want a share of Iraq's oil reserves, how could (Biden's) proposal to partion possibly succeed? (The reserves are predominantly in Shi'ite areas?)</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167925</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:21:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167925</guid><dc:creator>Doris Vician, Albuquerque, NM</dc:creator><description>To all candidates:  What will you do to see that health care is made available to all regardless of income?  What will you do to cut health care costs and rein in the health insurance companies?  Do you believe that health care and access to it is a right for all people?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167927</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:23:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167927</guid><dc:creator>S. Patterson</dc:creator><description>Do the Drms' have a strategy to win in Iraq or just one of leaving. Also, in light of such a robust economy, do they plan to leave the tax cuts in place.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167929</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:26:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167929</guid><dc:creator>Alan Vervaeke</dc:creator><description>Differences in color, sexual preference, and religion are still dramatically polarizing issues here in the United States. Obviously, efforts to grant special protections to individual classes has failed based on recent events and the public reaction to them. How would you propose creating a true "level playing field" for every resident of this country so that none have any more advantage than any other?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167930</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:26:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167930</guid><dc:creator>Moe Sawafi    Fairfax,VA</dc:creator><description>Do you think president Bush should be impeached because of his actions in Iraq</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167933</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:26:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167933</guid><dc:creator>Susan Dinsen, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>What specific plans do you have to make alternative energy affordable to the average citizen.  Solar panels on my roof, and the new Voltz car on way beyond what I can afford.  I have replaced all of my light bulbs with fluorescent bulbs.  I would do more, but I can't afford it. I also recycle trash.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167947</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:32:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167947</guid><dc:creator>MH, Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>My first question relates to the crisis in Darfur. If elected president, what intervention measures will you undertake to restore peace and stability not only in Sudan, but also in neighboring Ethiopia and Somalia? My second question relates to the trade deficit and our relationship with those who hold our debt. How will you leverage the U.S.'s debt with China and Japan, while pressing for the mitigation of China's repressive regime, and what domestic agenda will you institute to reduce the debt burden while increasing national net savings rates?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167953</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:36:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167953</guid><dc:creator>Kalene Clancy, Portland, OR</dc:creator><description>My question is this: Our constitution gives liberty, justice and equality to ALL.  Do you think it is fair to deny same-sex marriage or civil unions to tax paying Americans? If elected as President, what actions will you take to give equal rights to ALL?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167971</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:47:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167971</guid><dc:creator>Brandon Barnhardt, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>Do to bad trade deals with foreign countries the middle class that drives America is getting lost in translation? What do each of the caniditates propose to do to eliminate the gap between Rich, Middle Class, And the Poor? If it involves raising taxes so be it, just tell the American people the truth. If it offers a better life for my children then their is no price tag high enough. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167983</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:53:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167983</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth, Houston Texas</dc:creator><description>I would like to know if any of them have given thought to the plight of college graduates who have large student loan payments or to the impact that these payments have on the national economy.  If so, what proposals do they have?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#167991</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:56:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:167991</guid><dc:creator>gary gooch Albany Il.</dc:creator><description>    At what time are you elected officals going to decide that we are all equal and have the same retirement and health plan as we Americal people. Yeh like this will ever happen</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168019</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:12:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168019</guid><dc:creator>Greg Scanlon, San Francisco, CA.</dc:creator><description>To John Edwards:

As a man who tries to emphasize he's for the "little man", how do you justify $800 for 2 haircuts, and $500 in spa treatments applied to your campaign funds?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168028</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:17:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168028</guid><dc:creator>Dave windward </dc:creator><description>just one but large question is this..   what about the fair tax! and why hasn't anybody talked about it. I truly feel that is something that has to be discussed and moved towards to making it happen.  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168031</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:18:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168031</guid><dc:creator>Mary Hamlin, Nashville TN</dc:creator><description>What I want to know is why no one is addressing the one issue that could turn many things around in this country. Someone please ask the candidates this question...
How are you going to undo corporate america's misuse of our constitution to get themselves the legal status as a "person" thus ultimately having no responsibility for the political or financial raping "the corporations" are doing in our country?
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168034</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:19:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168034</guid><dc:creator>David, Bangkok Thailand</dc:creator><description>Will you be speaking out against the Bush Administration in the same tone as the Senate Majority leader and the Speaker of the House is now doing-- Like Harry S Truman said "Give "em Hell!"</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168035</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:19:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168035</guid><dc:creator>JJ, Houston</dc:creator><description>What would you do about the constant disrespect of the Office of the President that congress and its followers have been expressing? Has this eroded the office? If not what makes you think this way?  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168039</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:26:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168039</guid><dc:creator>David, Bangkok Thailand</dc:creator><description>Will you be speaking out against the Bush Administration in the same tone as the Senate Majority leader and the Speaker of the House is now doing-- Like Harry S Truman said "Give "em Hell!"</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168045</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:29:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168045</guid><dc:creator>Ralph Frawley, Waverly Hall, Georgia</dc:creator><description>If we can set a time table for bringing our Troops home, can we set a time table for all U.S. Citizens having affordable health insurance and for securing our borders? 

Thank you all and may God bless the USA!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168059</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:37:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168059</guid><dc:creator>Deborah Evilsizor</dc:creator><description>If one of you were elected for the Presidency, are there any of your current Democratic opponents you would want standng beside you as Vice-President?  If not VP, any other position?  Why or why not?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168063</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168063</guid><dc:creator>Sandra Atencio</dc:creator><description>My question is to Hillary.  As a woman and a very qualified candidate, how will you protect women from their right to choose.  Men do not understand why women need special protection when it comes to their own bodies.  Bush placed his cronies on the Supreme Court and we see from their actions that they will follow "their cronie's" directive when it comes to womens rights. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168066</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:41:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168066</guid><dc:creator>John Reynolds, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator><description>Question for Senator Clinton: Given the fact that the American electorate system is viewed overwhelming negative by most U.S. Citizens and only a fraction of eligible voters actually vote, why won't you support a change in our campaign finance laws?   </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168072</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:47:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168072</guid><dc:creator>Gretta Collins, Houston, TX</dc:creator><description>It is a tragic loss that individuals like Joe Biden and Christopher Dodd, two of the most competent, knowledgeable and experienced persons in this race have such a fight to get media attention because of money. It's a crime that this race has been reduced to Hillary and Osama so early in an election of such significance. Thank god for the debates........bring them on! 
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168074</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:47:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168074</guid><dc:creator>Parvin Woods</dc:creator><description>Lady and Gentlemen, If you are against the war in the Mid-East, how do you propose America help others gain the Freedom and Liberty that we American's enjoy each day of our lives? Or, do you believe that we can just give them money and hope they will leave us along? Was it not John Kennedy that said "other countries should not ask what America can do for them but what together we can do to spread Liberty and Freedom to all mankind".</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168080</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:51:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168080</guid><dc:creator>jim,  bloomington, mn</dc:creator><description>Ask Senator Clinton - does anything matter more to you than power?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168084</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:54:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168084</guid><dc:creator>gary miner, shelton, wash</dc:creator><description>What do you admire of your opponents, one by one, and why would your strengths be more desireable to the voter?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168085</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:54:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168085</guid><dc:creator>Brian O'Toole</dc:creator><description>My question to Hillary would be why was Scooter Libby given such a hard time when no notice was paid to Sandy [Pants] Berger for stealing documents and hiding them in his pants.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168090</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:58:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168090</guid><dc:creator>Martha Scheele, Indianapolis,In.</dc:creator><description>Iwould like to ask them; what are your plans to defends us from other attacks, they are to busy critizasing President Bush for everthing he does, but I haven't hear from any Democrats what are they going to do if we are attack again.  How they are goin to defend this country from other attacks At least we feel safe now.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168091</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:59:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168091</guid><dc:creator>Phil B, Burbank, Ca</dc:creator><description>What will they do about ending the ridiculous war on drugs?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168092</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:59:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168092</guid><dc:creator>Nolan Miller   DeFuniak Springs,Fl.</dc:creator><description>As for our troops in Iraq, bring them home put foreigners with criminal back grounds out of our country.Let our troups protect the country they believe in at home and not abroad.Let Iraq fight their on battle's.They are one of the richest nations in the world right.My question would be why are the american people paying for this war when we are in need in our own country.We have numerous homeless,jobless,no health care,but our government gives away billions of dollars each year to foreign countries that needs to be used at home first.My question is why and how do you people justify that.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168093</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:59:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168093</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Wilson, Wilmington NC</dc:creator><description>I would ask all the candidates whether we should allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, and if not, would pre-emptive strike be an open option? --  Candidates must say YES OR NO as part of their answer! </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168094</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:00:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168094</guid><dc:creator>Delmar Fairchild, Barron, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>I would like to know how much money is in the pockets of each candidate from George Soros and if they become president, what will George have them do to this country? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168286</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:40:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168286</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth Heimes, Boone, Iowa</dc:creator><description>Previous world powers have declined because of bankruptcy.  What leadership priciples can you bring that will help this country get back on a solid financila footing?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168289</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:41:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168289</guid><dc:creator>rusty evans</dc:creator><description>i would like to know if any of the candidates have the backbone to stand up to big business and change our trade policy before we destroy more of our manufacturing?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168291</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:43:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168291</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Shaw, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>To all candidates:  What specifically in your background, training and experience -- other than serving as a politician -- qualifies you to command the armed forces of the United States as Commander-in-Chief?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168295</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:45:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168295</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Thomas, Wantagh, New York</dc:creator><description>We have heard how stem research violates the sanctity of life yet the “right to life” chorus doesn’t feel the same compulsion to protect the lives of our young soldiers whenever it involves our national interests however that is defined. It seems that this protection afforded to the living diminishes with age. I would appreciate your thoughts on this apparently self-serving inconsistency?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168298</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:47:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168298</guid><dc:creator>Sandra, New York</dc:creator><description>To: Obama, what makes you think you are qualified to become the President of the U.S of America? Just to
be the first person of African desent is simply not enough.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168305</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:50:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168305</guid><dc:creator>Bob McDonald, Indianapolis, IN</dc:creator><description>If Congress can fund billions to fight the war, why in peace time can't Congress fund $400 billion for improvements in this country (i.e infrastructure-highways), better education, and health plans, New Orleans</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168314</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:53:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168314</guid><dc:creator>Ron Kolb, Erie, Pa.</dc:creator><description>1. A president should be honest and courageous: How can you convince me that you have these qualities?
2. We can't win the battle of suicides in Iraq: Would you consider spending the war money communicating directly to the people via TV and radioinstead of killing people?
3. A corporation has no soul: how would you convince corporations to cease polluting? to not employ illegal aliens? to permit fair health care for all citizens? to be as honest as sensitive, as forgiving, as responsible as a human being?  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168315</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:54:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168315</guid><dc:creator>Willie, NYC</dc:creator><description>To Hillary Clinton, Why do you really want to become President of the US, you have been in the White House, and went though a lot during your husband's 8 eight years, aren't you tired of arguing with the Republicans, and why not wait until the war is over, before trying again.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168425</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168425</guid><dc:creator>don white, sylvester, ga</dc:creator><description>Which one of you will return christanity to the classroom and government , since this nation was founded on biblical principals</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168454</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:17:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168454</guid><dc:creator>Carol W., Springfield, MO</dc:creator><description>Environment, environment, environment. Who has a real plan?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168470</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:27:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168470</guid><dc:creator>L. Clements</dc:creator><description>I want to know how the candidates intend to work together and bring us back together after such a divisive administration.  How can they heal America?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168491</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:40:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168491</guid><dc:creator>Elisapeta E. Papalii, Pago Pago, American Samoa</dc:creator><description>My question to every candidate is this, how and when will this war end, we just witnessed the deaths of 9 soldiers this week, and one of my nephews is on his way to the same region in Iraq, I am afraid something terrible will again happen in the same region and hopefully not my nephew would be one of the coffins, Candidates, what can you do to end this madness and when will this happen, I hope soon than sooner, please ask the canddidates what their answers will be if they become elected in office in 2008. I pray for the safety of all our soldiers in that crazy war.

Thank you.

Elisapeta E. Papalii
American Samoa</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168503</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:46:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168503</guid><dc:creator>Mark Diaz  Rockwall, Texas</dc:creator><description>Whether it be the Vice President’s fixing of pre-war intelligence, the Justices’ department condoning the use of torture, or the President authorizing military tribunals, enemy combatant classifications, secret prisons and the deprivation of due process and the right to a speedy trial, the list of constitutional abuses is shocking.   


If elected President would you call for the repeal of the Patriot act and do you support Rep. Kucinich in his call for the impeachment of Cheney? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168517</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:58:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168517</guid><dc:creator>Bill Roush, Joshua Tree  California</dc:creator><description>I would like to know if the candidates are in favor of giving people illegally in this country social security benifits and if so please explain how you are to justify this to the american worker who has paid in all thier working life</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168528</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:06:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168528</guid><dc:creator>Roger Nieman</dc:creator><description>Many Americans feel that politicians who have never held a "real" job in their life don't live in the same reality that most of us do.  I would like to ask the candidates what jobs they worked at when they were younger (do not include "lawyer" or "I ran for state representative") and what did they learn from their labor?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168535</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:14:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168535</guid><dc:creator>Ryan Meyerhoff</dc:creator><description>I want to know how the candidates address the lack of biosecurity that exist at large poulty and swine farms.  It is this lack of biosecurity, not just in the United States but within other countries as well, that is leading to the emergence of highly pathenogenogenic viruses and bacteria that could become a great risk to the global economy.  An example being the H5N1 avian influenza or its cousin, the human to human transmissable H7N7 avain influenza seen in the Netherlands.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168542</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:18:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168542</guid><dc:creator>A. Steele, Indiana</dc:creator><description>2 questions:1) senator clinton, how do you feel that leaders of nations world-wide would respect you and thus respect the US?
2)(all candidates) what plans do you have on the issue of medical insurance for older persons?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168553</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:29:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168553</guid><dc:creator>Johanna Dordick, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>I'm tired of the grandiose generalized statements of Barack Obama, and the convoluted, controlled overly-processed positions of Hillary Clinton. The press has driven this horserace between the black candidate and the first serious woman candidate. And the result has been the incessant spotlight on those two candidates at the expense of the only candidate who has clearly spelled out his positions on the major issues of most concern to Americans, John Edwards. I do not believe Clinton or Obama can win the general election, and if the press continues this overwhelming focus on those two candidates, they will be responsible for engineering not only who the Democratic Nominee will be, but more than likely, assist the Republicans in  again taking the White House. Their recent self-recrimination and mea culpas seem to have had no effect on their irresponsible ways. And the American people deserve better.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168555</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:30:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168555</guid><dc:creator>Norman Solomon, La Jolla, CA</dc:creator><description>I would like to hear each candidate's views on the place of religion in politics. Would any of them court the votes of conservative "religious" voters by reaching out to them in speeches that might be considered "pandering"?  Will they use religious references in their campaigns in general?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168564</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:39:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168564</guid><dc:creator>LuAnne Fehrle, Marysville, Wa</dc:creator><description>Joe Biden is the only candidate to have articulated a difinitive understanding and plan for how the US involvement in Iraq needs to proceed. Let us all hope he articulates his understanding and plan, and directly challenges each of the other candidates to respond, suscinctly, with THEIR understandings and plans to end this drain of our economic and human resources, let alone the attendant squandering of our future relations with the rest of the world population and governments.  End this one challenge well and the rest of our problems will be more likely to have the clear attention of our legislators.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168566</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:40:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168566</guid><dc:creator>Ron B. Stanwood,WA</dc:creator><description>Does any one of the candidates remember the SS lockbox game they played us on? Independent and bi-partisan reports for over a decade reveal a major financial train wreck is coming on social security and none on this panel have done or proposed a solution. If elected president will you a)re-visit personal savings accounts, b) substantially increase SS taxes or c) reduce benefits? There is no 4th option
out there.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168575</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:46:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168575</guid><dc:creator>Talim Lessane, Chicago IL</dc:creator><description>There are several excellent questions already on the board, so to avoid duplication I would like the candidates to address the following: 

1) in light of recent comments by individuals in the public eye (Michael Richards, Don Imus) as the catalyst(s) for public discussion, how do you feel about the current state of race relations in this country and do you feel a necessity for reviving the panel on race relations initiated by fmr. pres. Clinton,or how else would you propose to continue to move us forward.

2)Recognizing that gun control/freedom via the 2nd amendment remains a hot button issue for many Americans, especially in light of the recent tragedy at Virginia Tech, why is that many Democrats have backed off of it as political issue to pursue? If not by gun control per se, and this may be the bigger issue, then what do you think can be done to change the tide of gun-related violence in this country that is so pervasive, per capita, compared to other major industrialized nations?

3) What do you propose to truly make college more affordable for lower and middle income Americans without having to stake their futures to tremendous loans that are an immediate burden before their careers have even begun?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168583</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:53:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168583</guid><dc:creator>Tiffany Murrell, Indianapolis, IN</dc:creator><description>As president, what substantial, significant, and indiscriminant measures would you take to restore and augment our country's rapport throughout the international community. Please be specific and cite examples.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168589</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:58:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168589</guid><dc:creator>Chuck Beller, Indianapolis, Ind.</dc:creator><description>To any who would like to coment. It is a sad time for American workers and their communities all across this great land that are suffering because the ranks of labor unions have slipped to all time lows. Good paying jobs for the average American are going by the wayside, with factories closing or moving opperations outside the USA. With what seems to be little or no end in sight, what would you do to help the unions when you become president? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168590</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:58:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168590</guid><dc:creator>Carl Oliver, Columbia, SC</dc:creator><description>Question for Senators Obama and Clinton
It is will know that African Americans and lower middle class Anglo-Saxon as well as many minorities believed former President Bill Clinton to be the people’s president. Or more to the point, African Americans sees President Clinton as their president.  And if this is true, then Senator Hillary Clinton is clearly the heir apparent to this legacy; what can Senator Barack Obama offer this group of disenfranchise Americans citizen differently than that of Senator Clinton.  And vice a versa, to Senator Clinton, being the heir apparent (or Not) to President Clinton legacy of good government and prosperity what changes are you likely to make? Why? 
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168593</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:59:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168593</guid><dc:creator>Donna, Springfield, NE</dc:creator><description>Please ask a question regarding how each candidate would go about breaking the corporate greed cycle affecting most or all of the campaign issues.  In other words, how would you best break the cycle of government of the business, by the business, and for the business, since Americans have always made it plain that we expect this government to be run by the people for the welfare of the common good with regards to decisions affecting everything from international conflicts and policies to domestic issues regarding all topics that his us at home, such as health care, pensions, employment, and educational trends. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168595</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:03:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168595</guid><dc:creator>William Moore, PLano, Texas</dc:creator><description>I am am 63 year old male with 7 children and 12 grandchildren.What type of world and country will they wake up  to in 2017 if you were elected and served two terms. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168614</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:16:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168614</guid><dc:creator>Steve Heimoff</dc:creator><description>Hi Chris, I hope you will press the Republicans in particular on the issue of gay rights. Having watched you for years, I believe you're a fundamentally fair person. Please, please hold their feet to the fire on this. Don't let them dodge. Do they disavow and repudiate the more hateful comments from the far religious right? Do they have any gay friends or relatives? What exactly is their stand on marriage, civil unions, etc. They will try to dance and spin -- don't let them!!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168618</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:18:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168618</guid><dc:creator>Teri L. Curren</dc:creator><description>If a Democrat wins the election in 2008, and if you pull out the troops before the job is done; and the terrorists come here and do worse than 9/11.  Will you be the first to agree that the Country made a mistake and will you be in the forefront to defend our country???</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168640</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:41:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168640</guid><dc:creator>Mark P</dc:creator><description>I would ask all the candidates if they would 
sign a pledge not to allow "phony debate
infomercials" in the General Election 
in November between the Republicans and Democrats?

Pledge to get rid of the Consultants, Trainers,Dog 
Handlers Make Up and Hairspray Artists
And stop screening out all the 
tough questions and stop it with the "Infomercials"
that are falsely presented as "Debates"
which are merely "memorized talking points"

It is oviously fake, staged, planned and scripted
by the "special interest groups"
and campaign handlers on both sides.

All Presidental Candidates should sign a pledge to have a real discussion of the issues on 
national television without bogus pre planned
and planted questions that skip the real issues.

You are not fooling us.  We can spot your phoniness
a mile away.  If you do not know why you want to 
be President and what your core values and beliefs are
and what you plan to do if elected, then don't
hire a bunch of pollsters and political consultants
fresh out of college to try to tell you what we
think and want.  

Please just don't waste our time.  You may as well
stay home or go to some cocktail party and bore someone else about it

Should Candidates pledge to put the Debates back
into non partison hands like the League of Women
Voters or other such group?

Should candidates pledge to "Shut Down The
K Street Pay For Play Campaign Cash For Legislation
System?
 </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168659</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:59:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168659</guid><dc:creator>Marty Cedar Rapids Iowa</dc:creator><description>I would ask , what are you going to do to straighten out Congress, the bickering there is holding up any progress our country can and must make. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168719</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:59:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168719</guid><dc:creator>D Bulgrin Jr.  Pine Az.</dc:creator><description>I would like to know why it is, candidates promise to do things that they should already be doing if that is thier position. If your not doing it now, than why should I vote for you. Why is it always the last 24 months before an election "things are going to get done"? Show me what you can do before than. Otherwise, its yadda, yadda.
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168755</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:24:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168755</guid><dc:creator>David Potts, Junction City, Ks </dc:creator><description>my question to all is with all the taxes and donations to this country why are we not debt free there are corporations that are run better.  Don't you believe something has to be done about all the unnecessary expenses in this country. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168762</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:32:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168762</guid><dc:creator>Jim Mac, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>When will you end the "culture" of legalized corruption you call campaign financing and get you back to work ...on second thought.
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#168778</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:53:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168778</guid><dc:creator>Howard, Muncy, PA</dc:creator><description>Debators:
What do you feel the national priorities are?
How far are you willing to go to resolve these issues to fulfill them?  Substance, please, not rhetoric.
Will you get us out of Iraq with honor? Unlike Vietnam, helicopters evacuating the grateful few as the enemy is converging on diplomatic territory, should not be repeated!  Too few actually remember our disgrace in VietNam and equate the present situation accordingly.  There are no similiarities between the Vietnam and Iraq conflicts other than our government got us into the situation with no clear cut exit strategy. We did not belong in Vietnam and we do not belong in Iraq. Plain and simple.  Terrorism was an issue then, North Korea, China and the North Vietnamese, and it is still an issue now. Make damn sure they can't get into our country and assist other countries in their fight against terror.  Can you do this with the assistance of the other political party,in other words eliminate bipartisanship, and strive to get other world leaders involved in the struggle? Someone with a "vision" and tactfulness can, is it you?
It's imperative that we pull this country back together again or nothing will be resolved. In the debates, I will be looking, and voting for the candidate that can resolve this countries "them against us" attitude. We will never get anywhere from here! 

</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169083</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:20:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169083</guid><dc:creator>Bill Thomas, Fort Madison, Iowa</dc:creator><description>My question is:  Rail Labor Unions have long been the backbone of protecting Americas' Railroad workers from the "Robber Barons" of this hardship-prone occupation.  Given this is a Democratic Party Presidential Debate, it is understood that you are all pro-labor.  What is it that you intend to do to help rebuild and keep these Rail labor unions strong after the beating they have taken over the last seven years?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169086</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:22:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169086</guid><dc:creator>W Thurmond, Lawrenceville, Georgia</dc:creator><description>I would like to know why you think it is the place of the Federal Government to run the healthcare system, considering the government doesn't run anything well.  How would this be done without raising taxes extremely high?  Why would anyone want a plan as they do in Canada or England, where their citizens come to the US to get medical procedures done they can't get done at home?  Under Universal Care, one would have to wait months to get procedures done, where now they can get medical procedures done almost immediately.  

It is unfortunate that medical procedures do cost as much as they do, but if our country wants the best health care in the world, it takes money.  Someone has to pay.  Nothing is free.  This just seems like another welfare program to buy votes.  

Americans should be ashamed of themselves when they no longer want to take care of themselves, but leave all life decisions to the Imperial Federal Government.  This is giving away your freedom, your right to live and choose as one sees fit.  



</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169119</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:44:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169119</guid><dc:creator>Don G., Gaithersburg, MD</dc:creator><description>The world is becoming an increasingly dangerous place by the hour. The United States should not be the primary country to try to solve the world's problems militarily or otherwise. If negotiating fails and military action is the only recourse, then all countries should share in the burden of supplying troops, equipment, money, etc. There should be no token support from any nation, but real, substantive support by everyone. My question is, "Shouldn't the United Nations be the only body to police the world's trouble spots"? The United States and her allies cannot and should not, continue to be the policemen of the world. These are world problems whether we like it or not and every nation has a stake in it.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169120</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169120</guid><dc:creator>Ida Ikhtiari, Spokane, WA</dc:creator><description>I would like to know if the American public has had enough of the status quo to tune into these debates and pay attention.  Then get out and vote.  It is time that we all realize that we get what we vote or don't vote for.  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169131</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:57:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169131</guid><dc:creator>Don G., Gaithersburg, Md</dc:creator><description>To Hillary Clinton: Social Security would be in much better shape if only those who paid into the fund during their working years received benefits. With Baby Boomers retiring or nearing retirement, what are your plans to address the issues of rising health care costs and Social Security?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169135</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:01:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169135</guid><dc:creator>Margie Jones,  Atlanta,Ga.</dc:creator><description>I believe we have the best healthcare services in the world, however many Americans are not covered by any type of health care insurance.  While I would like to see more Americans have access to healthcare, I am concerned that with a universal government coverage, there would be delays and wait lists for surguries and treatments similar to what is now seen in Canada.  Do you have a plan for health care coverage that will maintain the high standards and short wait lists that we now experience?  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169138</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:03:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169138</guid><dc:creator>M. L. Hartsell, Chapel Hill, NC</dc:creator><description>Show me the money! Can you count and can you find those who should be accountable. Specifically, the money that can't be accounted for by the Bush administration. I'd like to know where BILLIONS have gone, that apparenly are just lost. Is anyone looking for that money? Who is responsible for the loss and what will you do to find the money? Where is the OIL money in IRAQ? Why are we spending BILLIONS to support a war that is going around in circles? Where is the money going "to support the troops"? I don't think the money gets to the troops. How much did the cement wall cost? Whose idea was that? And last but not least, where EXACTLY are WE getting this money? Afterall, a billion here and a billion there and soon we are talking some serious money!Funding the troops is not about support or not, that's the politics, funding a war that is sending the country into bankruptcy, that is criminal.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169148</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:11:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169148</guid><dc:creator>DB Texas</dc:creator><description>I would like to ask each candidate "What are you going to do on the issue of same-sex marriages in the U.S. when most of these people are tax payers and busisness owers yet are treated as second class citizens? Why so we allow the hate among our own people of the U.S. yet we worry about how people on other countries get along. If we want to change them shouldn't we set an example of how people are supposed to be instead of telling them do as we say, not as we do? I call this hypocracy of our own constitution and the rights of LIFE, LIBERTY, and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS&gt;</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169221</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:00:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169221</guid><dc:creator>Kirk Dennis</dc:creator><description>MSNBC says the main topic of the debate tonight will be the war in Iraq.  They are right I'm sure.  The war in Iraq is very important to all of us and a major issue, however to those of us who simply work for a living every day it is not the only important issue.  Rising energy prices are crippling our economy and will continue to do so.  No one seems to care.  Legal and illegal immigration to this country is stressing our systems and our lifestyle -  what there is left of it.  Does anyone have any kind of a plan to try to restore some sense of order to our country, or will we just continue down the same road we have been taking for so many years.  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169228</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:05:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169228</guid><dc:creator>Justus et Veritas , Delray Beach, FL</dc:creator><description>I'd like to see the candidates asked about gun control. In the wake of the tragedy @ Virginia Tech, how many of them see this as their cue to wage war against our Constitution? Specifically Dennis Kucinich, who has claimed to be drafting a handgun ban legislation. ALL of our Constitution matters. ALL OF OUR RIGHTS. Privileges are things that are illegal unless you have permission, RIGHTS cannot be made illegal by ANYONE! Even a 99-1 vote can't take away MY INALIENABLE RIGHTS. Screw the left-right B.S. pseudo-choice in our mainstream today. We need candidates who support ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, not just which ones you think are better because you have NO REAL CHOICE.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169238</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:11:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169238</guid><dc:creator>Charles Stewart</dc:creator><description>Given that all candidates were either against the war in Iraq or have voted for a near immediate pullout of the troops, (1) are they willing to oversee or observe probable genocide in Iraq, (2) if not, what would their plan and conditions be for our troops then again entering Iraq from suggested redeployed areas nearby to quell or again attempt stabilizing Iraq, (3) how many troops would they station in redeployed areas, and in what countries would they be redeployed, (4) would the troop redeployment be at full strength or just a token force for show, (5)  assuming troop redeployment, what is each candidates' crystal ball foretell as to an Iraq future nearterm and midterm?

Please, each candidate provide five conditions where and how the Iraqi people be better off today had Hussein remained in power.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169249</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:20:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169249</guid><dc:creator>Harry W. Smith          Lavalette, WV</dc:creator><description>I would like to ask each candidate "are you going to see that your administration provides people who have reached retirement age, but has an illness such as diabetes, with a good prescription plan in order that they can retire instead of having to continue working because of their high prescription costs."  The people of this rich country know this could be done!  The question is.....which one of you candidates consider this a high enough priority that you plan on doing it???</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169255</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:25:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169255</guid><dc:creator>Barry DeRoze, Bethesda, Maryland</dc:creator><description>To Any/All:  What role do you believe nuclear power should play in a comprehensive national energy program?  What steps will you take to implement your vision?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169266</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:37:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169266</guid><dc:creator>Barbara Mathies, Huntingburg, Indiana</dc:creator><description>I would like to ask all the candidates, "why aren't there criminial investigations into the numerous heinous acts perpitrated by and covered up by the President, Vice-President, Secretary of State and all the inner circle characters. Would you pursue legal actions against these criminals if you were president now?"</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169273</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:42:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169273</guid><dc:creator>Bob Oates   Miami,Fl</dc:creator><description>With all the problems facing our country, why do some people still consider abortion and same sex marriages as the deciding factor for their vote?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169290</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:58:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169290</guid><dc:creator>JL Wyoming,RI</dc:creator><description>I would like to know what each candidates' VERY SPECIFIC plan is to handle illegal immigration. Also I want to know what their plan for the war in Iraq is as a commander-in-chief, again, SPECIFICALLY.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169329</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:20:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169329</guid><dc:creator>K. W. S.  Bowling Green, KY</dc:creator><description>The majority of americans do their best each day to follow the laws of this land, especially since we are a nation of rules and regulations to insure its' people live their life as honorably, truthfully, justly &amp; safely as possible. That's part of being an American. America's door has always been opened to those who believe in what she stands for. But some americans have forgotten what the word "illegal" means when it comes to immigration. To continue immigration as it is will be irresponsible to this country's foundational principles of knowing the difference between right &amp; wrong. As President &amp; leader of the free world, what do you feel is the best course to take in order to become an American legally &amp; honorably who are not?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169336</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:22:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169336</guid><dc:creator>Brian,  Austin, TX</dc:creator><description>Foreign policy has been the focal point in government far too long.  Security for America's future and the War on Terror are very important aspects, but let's all be honest with ourselves.  Terrorism is never going to completely go away no matter how much money and resources are spent on it.  The war on drugs is much more worth taxpayer dollars because at least drugs have a chance of getting off our streets.  I want and expect the democratic candidates to talk about the "pocketbook issues" of our country again.  I want to know as a middle-class citizen why according to a new poll the top 1% of our country is earning 22% of the total national income which hasn't happened since the Depression in 1929.  I want to know why there's a widening gap between rich and poor, why our hard earned taxpayer dollars and a depleted Treasury are going to fund a lousy Iraq War and why gas and energy are getting outrageous while I see no real increase in my wage.  I also want to hear why its getting so expensive to send kids to college, afford healthcare, why free trade has crippled our economy with lost jobs and why more money isn't being spent on alternative energy since Exxon and BP are making record profits.  They could turn the country's energy use away from oil so fast because the money is there, but that would be bad for the oil profiteers.  I know that there's 30 million people in Iraq that need a democracy, but there's also 30 million poor citizens in this country that need help which Katrina exposed and no one is talking about.  The priorities of this Administation are pretty messed up.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169344</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:27:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169344</guid><dc:creator>Tom Bittner, Hoboken, NJ</dc:creator><description>In consideration of a U.S. withdraw from Iraq, what strategies would you enact to preserve the dignity of both the U.S. and Iraqi governments and the people of both countries?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169360</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:35:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169360</guid><dc:creator>clarence hall</dc:creator><description>a debate managed by chris matthews will not be anything but a popularity contest (remember high school).  matthews love hillary and obama and hates any republican.  his demeanor, the inference and slant of even seemingly direct simple questions will support a left wing bias and agenda.  so i ask you, why don't you forgo this farce and get it down to a two man debate (or man/woman) no holds  barred like (incoln/douglas).  i don't need or want to hear from the pretenders with no chance getting elected.  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169361</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:36:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169361</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Arlington, Tx</dc:creator><description>What is the position of each candidate with regards to supporting the current Immigration Laws and how the lack of enforcement is allowing 10,000 (estimated)daily illegal border crossings. Especially considering polls state more than 70% of the your constituents want Immigration Laws to be enforced.  (Doesn't these numbers tell you as our representatives what we want?)  


The followup question is: What is the best way to secure our northern and southern borders. Especially when looking at the number (est 10,000 daily) of individuals who illegally enter our country from either border that could possibly carrying a dirty suitcase bomb or biological agent?  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169372</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169372</guid><dc:creator>ross ryan, washington dc</dc:creator><description>will any candidate ever question why the intell leading us to invade Iraq was faulty?  Who had the most to gain?  Was it Israel, supported in the U.S. by a lobby (AIPAC) that no one wants to challenge? One of their enemies, Iraq, is now neutralized and we have been making threatening gestures against another (Iran).  Or was it DoD who like the generals of a generation past wanted a war to test new weapons and military strategy? Or was it a President who has his own emotional problems with his father and wanted to one-up him by doing what his father was too smart to do....invade Bahgdag? Or was it just a "perfect storm" of all these factors coming together at the wrong time?  And, Chris...if the candidates won't ask...why don't you....and play some real hardball!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169389</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169389</guid><dc:creator>T. Davis Ballard, Ocean Springs, MS</dc:creator><description>The problem with Democrats and Republicans is they want to talk about each other versus giving the voters specifics on the policies they will try to get past a bogged down Congress. Biden did this or Clinton said that. We don't want or need any more bickering, we want and need a results oriented Congress that will work for the voting public. If this means another political party is established that will get the job done then so be it. Get to work candidates and let the best qualifed person win.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169398</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:51:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169398</guid><dc:creator>JB Bayside NY</dc:creator><description>I would like to know one thing from all of the candidates. If the founding fathers of our country believed in the common man, who's ideas and belief's bring him forth to lead the people and transend him and the nation to a better tomorrow. How do you think they would feel about the fact that its money and not ideas that win an election? Why cant we make it an even playing field? Why must we as a nation have to deal with special interest groups, finance scandals and attack ads every year when election time rolls around?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169399</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:52:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169399</guid><dc:creator>D. Knight</dc:creator><description>I will be looking for fair media coverage and not shoving Clinton or Obama down our throats. I want to hear them all, with out the commentary telling me who won on this one or that one.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169426</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:06:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169426</guid><dc:creator>Ginger Edwards</dc:creator><description>My question: It appears to me that the one with the most money wins the election. What are we to do about changing it to the most qualified person for the job wins? It's time the American people got to pick the President, not the special interest groups and PACS who give the most money.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169473</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:32:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169473</guid><dc:creator>Marty Settle, Houston,Tx</dc:creator><description>To all debaters. Why has this administration hired out our wars to Mercenaries (private contractors).They have no allegiance to any country , including their own? They worship only the money to be made.Also do the candidates feel that we need a draft for our military to include all Americans to share in our country?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169482</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:36:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169482</guid><dc:creator>Marty Settle, Houston,Tx</dc:creator><description>Why is the Marine Corp at the disposal of the President? As a former Marine I understand that the President does not need the approval of congress to dispatch U S Marines any time or any where at his whims.Why do we as a people allow U S administrations to send us to war without our congress declaring war? Former Marine and radio broadcaster, first to fight and the last to know why!!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169486</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169486</guid><dc:creator>Steve Carter, Grenbelt, MD</dc:creator><description>September the 11th was carried out by 15 Saudi Arabians on orders from a Saudi Arabian, living in Afghanistan, a country recognized by only two other countries, one of which was Pakistan.

Did you hear me say Iraq?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169508</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169508</guid><dc:creator>Paula, Milwaukee WI</dc:creator><description>In light of the many school shootings that have occurred over the last decade (Virginia Tech and Columbine to name a couple that are well-known) what can be done to teach kids about gun violence and anger management to prevent this from continuing to happen in the future?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169517</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:50:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169517</guid><dc:creator>William Heffron</dc:creator><description>it seems to me that the media is 98% radical left and short changing the people of the country with slanted info and biased reporting. Years ago there was a TV show with the byline.."just give me the facts...."</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169530</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:00:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169530</guid><dc:creator>T.H. Messick Anaheim, CA</dc:creator><description>My question: 
Does someone who has lied to the American people deserve to be President?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169578</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:28:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169578</guid><dc:creator>Michael Cutler, Brookline MA</dc:creator><description>Please ask all the candidates to respond to this Q, based on the following premise:

Only one public policy approaches Iraq as a counter-productive fraud, based on fraudulent premises and responsible for egregious collateral damage with little if any evidence of progress:  The War on Drugs and Drug Users.  Do you agree that Drug Prohibition has failed to achieve gains in the reduction of harm caused by some (other than alcohol and tobacco, which annually kill 10x the amounted of deaths caused by all illegal drugs) dangerous drugs? &amp; if so, how would you change drug policy, to reduce the harm caused by both dangerous drugs and the current policy of drug prohibition?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169591</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:36:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169591</guid><dc:creator>Jose Brito, Paterson, NJ</dc:creator><description>Please ask the candidate:  What are their strategies to get out from Iraq?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169650</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169650</guid><dc:creator>Reve St. Clair</dc:creator><description>I think the so-called "second tier" group of five has more of an advantage tonight than the top three, and a terrific opportunity to move up in their positions.  The political junkies who are interested in watching this type of tv already know, and have pretty much made up their minds, about the top three because of the massive coverage already spent on them.  I expect the top three to play it safe.  The remaining five need to bare teeth and make the most of this opportunity to finally appear in front of the nation. It will pay exactly nada for them to sit back and play it safe.  Those of us who have had to dial all over hell's half-acre to find them on tv and hear what they have to say may just be surprised at some non-rhetoric that meshes more closely with our personal views on the direction of the country.  I hope it's exciting in this way.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169651</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:04:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169651</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Jacobs, Ridgeland, Miss.</dc:creator><description>I want to hear some real stances being taken by these candidates not just going with the opposite of Republicans views. Whatever candidate gets elected is going to half to make real decisions not constantly second guess decisions made by others, and that is exactly what they have been doing for the last eight years.I am a Republican that is as far right on every issue as i possible can be but i do see a lot of leadership ability out of Obama but he needs to show something in this debate besides the ability to wow audiences he needs to clear up the issues that surround his religious background. I do believe when the dust clears there will be to two people fighting it out for the job Mr. No experience and Mr. Experience John McCain its probaly going to be a toss up just like the last few elections</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169654</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:06:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169654</guid><dc:creator>Kay Frank, Fort Worth, TX</dc:creator><description>Do campaigns take priority over official responsibilities?  What objectives has each candidate accomplished during the past three months? What do expect to accomplish during the next six  months?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169658</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:07:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169658</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Jacobs, Ridgeland, Miss.</dc:creator><description>I want to hear some real stances being taken by these candidates not just going with the opposite of Republicans views. Whatever candidate gets elected is going to half to make real decisions not constantly second guess decisions made by others, and that is exactly what they have been doing for the last eight years.I am a Republican that is as far right on every issue as i possible can be but i do see a lot of leadership ability out of Obama but he needs to show something in this debate besides the ability to wow audiences he needs to clear up the issues that surround his religious background. I do believe when the dust clears there will be to two people fighting it out for the job Mr. No experience and Mr. Experience John McCain its probaly going to be a toss up just like the last few elections</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169667</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:12:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169667</guid><dc:creator>Max Acero, Texas</dc:creator><description>What do you hope to accomplish by passing a bill that you know will be vetoed? If a compromise must be made, why not work together in advance instead of as a last resort? On a critical issue like military funding, why couldn't Congress produce a clean bill?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169668</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:12:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169668</guid><dc:creator>Jesse, Pharr, TX</dc:creator><description>My question, why isn't our government feeding all of our hungry here in the U.S.?  Why does'nt the government offer some kind of health insurance to the people that can't afford any?  Why will social security run out in 2014?  The government says for lack of money.  Yet the U.S. has all ready spent Billions upon Billions of dollars on an unwanted war.  Where was all this money hiding that we could'nt use it for our own people?!  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169679</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169679</guid><dc:creator>Rolf Chakras, Gaithersburg, MD</dc:creator><description>Democratic challengers, I ask you this: Isn't it about time that our adult citizens are actually treated like adults, and therefore, what are your plans regarding the legalization of prostitution and the softer recreational drugs, as well as same-sex marriage? Ever since Reagan, we have been bamboozled into thinking centrists are actually liberal and that far right wingers are centrists. This country wouldn't know what to do with a real liberal - or the unvarnished truth. Wait until we find out what Bush has been doing behind out backs that we haven't found out as yet. Any person who believes religion is the "real" truth and that science is a misguided myth in a white lab coat that blocks "progress" is a serious case for treatment. No wonder the job is such hard work!  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169721</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:39:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169721</guid><dc:creator>Lee Phillips, Belt, Montana</dc:creator><description>My question would be threefold: Is corporate cronynism avoidable, why can we spend billions in Iraq and still NOT have healthcare in the US, blood for oil, Viggo Mortensen was right...when can we have green oilfree energy?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169787</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:21:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169787</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Elliott, Los Angeles, CA. </dc:creator><description>I will be waiting for the post coverage on MSNBC to see what Matthews has to say about Hillary Clinton. Regardless of how well she does...I can already predict he will find fault and aggressively attack her. This is one "journalist" who has already made up his mind. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169818</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:37:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169818</guid><dc:creator>michael h dittamore</dc:creator><description> to all the candidates: with what we now know from the issues surrounding Iraq W.M.D's, Skewed Intelligence, Spying on U.S Citizens (at home and abroad), Politicization of the Attorney Generals office,Crony ism at all levels of Government, see (Katrina Trailers), the emerging Fiasco with Student Loans,And the ever ongoing  disaster with Health Care), will you do to represent the people (us of course)to help instill trust and faith back into our system of governance for the People and by the People, where it should reside instead of the vested special interests that now control our elective process?? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169829</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:43:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169829</guid><dc:creator>michael h dittamore</dc:creator><description> to all the candidates: with what we now know from the issues surrounding Iraq W.M.D's, Skewed Intelligence, Spying on U.S Citizens (at home and abroad), Politicization of the Attorney Generals office,Crony ism at all levels of Government, see (Katrina Trailers), the emerging Fiasco with Student Loans,And the ever ongoing  disaster with Health Care), will you do to represent the people (us of course)to help instill trust and faith back into our system of governance for the People and by the People, where it should reside instead of the vested special interests that now control our elective process?? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169837</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:47:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169837</guid><dc:creator>Tony Dervin</dc:creator><description>Let's have questions that affect the American people, such as what the candidate will do about the huge deficit and also setting a timetable for getting out of the war in Irag asap.  Also, what will the candidate do toward repairing the United States' image abroad that has been so debased by the Bush administration?  And please, no questions on abortion or gay marriage.  They are distrating issues and personal matters which tell us nothing about the qualifications of a candidate.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169872</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:06:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169872</guid><dc:creator>Ericka Twigg</dc:creator><description>I would ask the candidates why it takes so much money to run for President of the United States. Do you really need $25 million to start campaigning? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169883</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:09:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169883</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Peoria, IL </dc:creator><description>Education, Education, Education... my question to them would be where does education fall as a priority to each candidate? What does each candidate think about Leave No Child Behind? What do they think needs to be done about America's failing schools? </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169927</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:28:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169927</guid><dc:creator>Kim, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>To all Candidates:  With all the scandals and distrust surrounding the White House and Executive Staff in the last decade, and longer, what do you plan to do in order to reinstate the United States Government with the respect it once had from it's own countrymen and the world.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169952</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:41:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169952</guid><dc:creator>Allan Ruiz , Torrance, CA</dc:creator><description>I believe that the majority of the problems of the Iraq conflict stem from the fact that the United States attacked a nation that had not attacked us first. To me the United States has to be about reacting to genuine occurrences and not to perceived threats.  

Is there any democratic candidate that would support a doctrine that simply says that the United States will not attack in force any nation that has not attacked us first - or - nation that first attacks one of allies requesting our help? 

America is the greatest nation in the world. America can take a few punches. If any country is stupid enough to attack us first we will have across the board support to retaliate. It should be fundamentally “Un-American” to for the Untied States to initiate war.
</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169961</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169961</guid><dc:creator>Phyllis Gorton</dc:creator><description>Senator Obama, Besides your postive additude towards things, how would you define your plan for exiting Iraq? Do you have a frame of time in mind?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#169981</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:53:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:169981</guid><dc:creator>Bette James, Winston Salem, NC</dc:creator><description>I would like to ask fo John Edwards what are the three most important character traits he would look for in every candidate to serve in the Cabinet.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170125</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:06:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170125</guid><dc:creator>gman, pinehurst, nc</dc:creator><description>What are the thoughts on the Fair Tax?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170136</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:11:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170136</guid><dc:creator>Cateyes</dc:creator><description>WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT KUCINICH'S CALL TO IMPEACH CHENEY!!!  HOUSE RESOLUTION 333, LOOK IT UP, STAND BEHIND IT AND STAND UP AMERICA FOR WHAT IS YOURS!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170139</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:12:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170139</guid><dc:creator>Michael Misovec</dc:creator><description>Education is most important to me. Which candidate will has the best ideas to solve rising tuition, student debt, opportunities for those who can't afford tuition. Employers often overlook highly skilled workers that may only have a high school diploma or associates degree. I want to hear about tax credits for employers offering tuition assistance and higher wages for students. Students need to pay off college costs.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170212</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:37:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170212</guid><dc:creator>Travis     Mullica Hill, NJ</dc:creator><description>What will you do as a candidate to improve race relations in this country?  I just returned from Sweden after living with a bi-racial family for 10 days.  They did not understand why the Don Imus situation was such a big issue and why everything seems to be about race, McDonalds and war here in the US!  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170251</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:46:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170251</guid><dc:creator>Travis     Mullica Hill, NJ</dc:creator><description>Which candidate is going to show true support for public education, which is what our taxpayers invest in our future?  Which candidate is going to stop the current economical system we have in this country where the middle class (such as myself)pay for the poor people's food and shelter, while the rich write off all their taxes on "business" outings on corporate jets, alcohol, and golf?  Which candidate is going to do more that just talk about ending our dependence on Middle East oil?  We need more tax breatks for installation of solar panels on people's roofs etc.  Talking won't get anything done!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170270</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:49:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170270</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>Gov Richardson is the only Hispanic contender. I hope he addresses the Immigration Issues and his view.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170353</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:05:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170353</guid><dc:creator>Margie Hoyt, Madelia, MN</dc:creator><description>I wish these blow hards would just give straight answers. Where's Wes Clark when you need him?!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170428</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:19:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170428</guid><dc:creator>charleen self, spanish fork, ut.</dc:creator><description>Hillary, do you think there should be a law against a president or wife taking things from the White House or Air Force One that doesn't belong to them but to the people??</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170481</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:28:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170481</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>I am so impressed by Most of the candidates!! Hillary was outstanding. Biden was good! Edwards was too quiet! Richardson was the dark horse that made a good showing. Obama seemed to be the one that was confronted by Dennis Kucinish. Dennis was aggressive and confrontational. The guy from Alaska was very Wacky!!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170525</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170525</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>For all of these photo ops after the show, WHERE IS BILL??? Hillary could win ALL THE CAMERAS IF BILL WAS THERE!!!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170650</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:53:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170650</guid><dc:creator>Steve Somers, Salisbury, UK</dc:creator><description>The one question for all candidates is obvious - why do you want to be president? I'd then be able to judge them on their key political skill - lying convincingly!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170746</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170746</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>I hope Saturday Night Live does a spoof on the Dem Debates and we need someone very special to play Kocinich and most of all someone extremely special to play Wacky Alaska Gravel!!

And they have to show the fight between Gravel and Hardlogger Chris!!

"Hiding under a Rock!!!" is the Best Quote of the Night!!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170769</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:07:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170769</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>And when they play Gravel on Saturday Night Live, they should dress him up like the cowardly lion during the debate with Chris.

"Put em up.... Put em up.. I can fight you with one hand tied behind my back!!"</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170784</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:11:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170784</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle Wash.</dc:creator><description>FMR. SEN Mike Gravel did an outstanding job calling out the rest of the candidates on thier hypocracy and lack of experience! What a breath of fresh air!</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#170797</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:15:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170797</guid><dc:creator>Debbie, Reading, PA</dc:creator><description>Hilary, Hilary, you being so firm in your convitions, how dare you use the unpoliticaly correct words "poor people" rather the are poverty stricken. </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#171256</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:38:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:171256</guid><dc:creator>Nanci Jewell, Reston, VA</dc:creator><description>This was an interesting opportunity to see all of the candidates, but I wish they would just answer the questions instead of paying lip service to it before launching into their 'sell'. Even Obama, for all his celebrated 'new' way of doing things, reverts to formula instead of giving a straight forward answer to most of the questions. Very frustrating - do they think we really don't see through that old ploy?</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#171411</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:56:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:171411</guid><dc:creator>D Hamilton, Oklahoma City</dc:creator><description>I would like to see Hillary and Obama team up for a President and Vice President ticket.  </description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#181347</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:11:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:181347</guid><dc:creator>Gerald Thalhammer</dc:creator><description>Will each of the candidates commit to having at least 8 debates of at least 90 minute duration with the Democratic Party candidate prior to the election.  Each debate would concentrate on one issue, notes would be permitted as would dialog?
We would learn a lot more than we possibly could on the traditional format.  Policy and vision cannot be defined in 30 seconds.</description></item><item><title>Matthews: What I'll be looking for at the debates</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/24/166855.aspx#182897</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 21:11:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:182897</guid><dc:creator>Les Peterson Arlington, WA.</dc:creator><description>Gee, since you, Chris, did the Republican debate, why isn't Bill O'Reilly doing the Democratic debate?</description></item></channel></rss>