http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspxAll the pundits and publicity now focus on Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to win the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. Don’t get stampeded into believing all this.   When it comes time for the Democrats of Iowa and other early contestsen-USCommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23118Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:00:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23118Bill Buffington, East Berlin, PA"...they will be looking for the candidate who is the best shot at winning in November. " Hmmm, they certainly did not do that in '04. Kerry, please! The republican machine will play up Edward's lack of political and foreign policy experience, although their candidate in '00 and '04 had none. I like Edwards, and think Hillary can't win nationally...but it's going to be brutal. Of course, if Bush continues his Iraq debacle for 2 more years, I might run and win. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23122Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:07:27 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23122Janet Blackman, Edison, New Jersey John Edwards would be the best thing that would happen to this country in a long while. We would have a President that is concerned with America for a change, as well as a man that would eliminate the identity that Bush has created of the United States as the “bully in the school yard” and bring us back to a respected World Power in the International Community of a fair and just presence. I believe John Edwards is the only one that could undo some of the reprehensible deeds and actions of Bush, and turn this Country around to the Great Nation we actually can be once again, with American peoples needs and interests the priority. The only voices Edwards will hear in his ear is that of the American people. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23123Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:08:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23123Rose, CAI am so thrilled and excited to finally have candidates running for president who know how to change current policies and who are willing to finally look America in the face and say, it is time for a change. Its a good feeling knowing that Edwards or even Clinton will work with us instead of against us. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23128Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:21:18 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23128Keri Caffreys, Portland, ORI voted for Edwards in the primaries last time and I'm voting for him again! EDWARDS in '08!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23131Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:23:45 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23131lynfordEdwards is,for me, a very good pick that sidesteps Clinton and Obama who both present tough obstacles for winning in 2008. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23132Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:24:45 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23132Manny Tacugue, New York, NYI absolutely agree. I think Mr. Edwards is a more believable, more likeable candidate for the Democratic Party. While Hillary carries the magic "Clinton" name, she is definitely not Bill. I still don't understand her presumed clout given how un-liberal she is - pro-war who up to now refused to disavow her misguided vote and seemingly only give lip service to other Democratic causes like human rights, right to choose (abortion), gay rights, etc. She's truly a conservative wolf hiding under the Clinton wool. Mr. Obama is indeed very charismatic, almost like Bill Clinton. But he has very limited experience to actual governing. Listen, my fellow Democrats, we should continue thinking of winning, of continuing our victory momentumhttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23133Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:26:06 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23133Nach667,Mount Clemens,MiNo more Republicans and no more southerners!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23144Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:36:35 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23144Patrick Gleason, Baltimore, MarylandI'm Republican. I didn't like Kerry. I do like Edwards. I didn't vote for Kerry. I would vote for Edwards. Nuff said. I like Edwards and if he manages to win the nomination I'll likely vote for him. I have spent the last two terms doing my best to believe that the Republican party in this nation knows more than I do and are working for the betterment of the country, but it has taken far too long and too little has been done, and as a result, I believe that this country needs a sweeping change. If I thought someone from my own party could manage that, I would vote for them, but at this point it seems that the ideology that my party possesses is bad for the Nation in general.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23149Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:40:17 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23149Justin DThere are tons of better qualified dems than Clinton, Obama, and Edwards--folks who have been around the Senate for decades, not just one (Clinton, Edwards), or worse--half of one (Obama). Think about that for a minute. I would much rather have Joe Biden for president (or Patrick Leahy or Chris Dodd if they runs). Seasoned politicians who've been around Washington for long enough to know the history of how the game is played, not rookies. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23150Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:40:32 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23150Helen, Weddington, NCI voted for him last time 'round, and I'll do it again. Heck, I'll vote for Edwards just to have Elizabeth in the White House! "Saving Graces" should be a must-read for anyone feeling particularly cynical about the current state of affairs in this country; it's beautifully written, painfully honest and tremendously inspiring. Seriously, though, Edwards is a man with a vision... something sorely lacking from a number of recent political candidates. I'm ready for a candidate who is asking us all to make a difference. Slapping a magnetic "Support our Troops" decal on your SUV does not equate to positive action for the country. We all should be working towards making this a better country for our children and grandchildren. No one person can solve all our problems; but one person can spark a passion in the rest of us to do our part. That, I believe, is Edwards' greatest strength--aside from Elizabeth, of course.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23151Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:40:54 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23151Patti Farris, Milan, MOSounds like we are getting on the right track. Good luck to Edwards...I think he will help America.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23152Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:42:26 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23152WillieJohn Edwards did nothing as a senator and could not even win his home state with Al Gore. His rhetoric is mostly to the underclass and unions and does not resonate with many other voters. He will definitely not get my vote!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23153Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:42:40 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23153Joseph Franks Cleveland, TennesseeI think right now at this point in time, Edwards is a much more attractive and viable canidate than any other democrat that has been mentioned as a possibility. The republicans will savage both Hillery and Obama and this still plays well in certain parts of the country. I just want a democrat who can win and one that is able to restore this country to its past greatness and ideals.Right now Edwards appears to be that person.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23154Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:43:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23154Robert Casper WYI believe the most probable ticket that will present the best chance of decocrats gaining the white house is Edwards-Obama.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23155Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:43:50 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23155wm b disneyas things are now I can't think of a Republican I would bet on to win against Obama.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23157Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:45:10 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23157Pierre Durand, Concord, NHWe (America) know Edwards. We like Edwards. He has no Congressional seat to focus on, only this race to the White House. Those are some strong cards to be holding in your hand. I agree with all the comments before. The idea of waking up tomorrow with John Edwards in the White House delivers a real sense of peace. I think even moderate GOP memebers, although not likely to be elated, would not be entirely disheartened should he win. I would vote for John Edwards as my President. In fact, I already did.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23158Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:45:39 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23158ROCKY, fort lauderdale, FLIAfter the idiots we've had for 8 years...I would welcome Barney the purple dragon to run for president. Bush and his family have left a black eye on americas integrity...I hope there's plenty of investigations towards Chenney and Bush and their corrupt friends...A La Starr investigation of Clinton...let's really investigate these traitors to america...they sold out to big business...SOMEONE FIND OUT WHAT HAPPEBNNED IN THOSE dICKY cHANEY'S MEETINGS WITH ENERGY GIANTS!!!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23159Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:45:54 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23159Suzanne, Memphis, TNI see in John Edwards glimpses of Kennedy in '68. This is a man who I believe is dedicated to transforming American politics. Just one way he is already doing this is online - his grassroots civic volunteerism org, www.OneCorps.com is EXACTLY how we make America work of by and for the people again.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23161Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:47:19 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23161Boyd RetraGreetings,Just to hear him speak John Edwards is intelligent very educated and smart with the american people to bring his message accross and a hard worker that listens and is not a stubborn man a great communicator and a gentleman fom a terrific State N.C. Remember he is the best to lead our country!!!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23163Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:49:11 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23163Theresa Novak, Dallas, TexasI was praying John Edwards would run! He is a family man with values who has compassion for the poor. He will focus on the U.S.A and make us proud once again to be Americans. He is not so ego driven that he would subject us to the hell of the Bush administration, just because he was too stubborn and swollen headed to admit defeat! He has my vote.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23165Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:51:45 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23165Patrick DeChristopher, Waynesville, OhI feel Edwards can win the Democratic nomination, provided Al Gore doesn't run in 08!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23167Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:54:06 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23167Katie Trumpour, Fair Play, SCEdwards is a trial lawyer who made money suing big business. He is an upscale ambulance chaser. With all the hype, where are the solutions. Be it Democrate of Republican, they had better present proposed solutions to their planks, not just "I want to change ....." (you fill in the blanks) before they get my vote.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23169Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:59:59 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23169wm b disneyas things are now I can't think of a Republican I would bet on to win against Obama. McCain will probably experience what Doel did in 96. The war hero identity will be old news and he'll vulnerable to attacks from someone like Steve Forbes crawling out from under a rock, too bad for John McCain. Too bad for Edwards that he and Obama can't run together as equals instead of as president and Vice President, each seems to appeal to what Lincoln called "the better angels of our nature", the only way out of this wreck if there is one.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23171Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:01:35 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23171Ernest GiancolaThank goodness Hillary is no Bill, Mr.Edwards bring no solution only nice ideas in an unrealistic time frame. Ending poverty ! Whats the plan? How many decades? Continue to offer illegales everything Americans can't have. Edwards is the wrong guy at the wrong time.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23172Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:02:18 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23172Will Hanbury, Jr., Sitka, Alaska John Edwards is not the man for the White House. The Democrats are just now shedding the image of weak, leftists, and people like Obama are showing that we Democrats can be strong, centrist, and can represent the moral majority. While Edwards may have the right message, he physically wilted like a lily under pressure from Dick Cheney. At a time when national security is of the utmost importance, our new president must appear strong and unfazed in the face of aggression and conflict. As I said earlier, John Edwards wilted under the pressure of a debate. That doesn't project a strong image for him. Obama might take it, but it's still a long shot. Edwards also has the stigma of a trial lawyer, and that works against him. Of course, the Republicans would like the weakest possible candidate in there, so they can sabotage him to make their choice look good. Look what they did to Howard Dean.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23173Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:06:12 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23173Steven Hawley, Milwaukee, WiEdwards is a VERY welcome alternative to a self serving, cameleon-esch Hillary & a patronizingly slick Obama. Either Hillary or Barack would be terrible choices as they both shy away from taking alot of real, clear moral legislative stands on the most important issues facing our nation today. Edwards is clearer, bolder, has a great deal more integrity than the so-called "front runners" , & is a heck of a lot more likable!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23174Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:09:04 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23174Edward Shipwash, Oakland, CAEdwards is the only candidate with the right vision of what America should be. He understands the problems. And he knows how to solve them. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23176Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:11:38 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23176Carole, Fort LauderdaleI'm glad that Edwards announced early to stop this Clinton and Obama thing that the cable news stations are focusing on so intensely. I hope the media will stop looking at the 2008 Democrat campaign as a two horse race. Edwards is clearly a more viable, i.e., electable, candidate then either Clinton or Obama (admittedly he has little foreign policy background -- but then what did Bush know about foreign policy in 2000 or even 2004? and what background does Obama have?) Edwards seems to have a great popular platform and I would like to see more balanced news coverage, especially now that he has announced and neither Obama nor Clinton have done so. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23177Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:12:02 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23177Ryann, Winnipeg, CanadaJohn Edwards is the candidate with the only winning formula that's worked for democrats in the last several decades; he's the charming, wealthy, white man from the south. He could easily be the default choice when voters get cold feet about choosing a woman (Hillary) or a (half) minority (Barack).http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23179Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:14:55 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23179JGatanHmm...imagine if it comes to an Edwards/Obama ticket. That would mean the Democrats could control the WH for like...16 years!;)http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23181Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:17:28 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23181gordon pate;birmingham al.Isn't the key for the democrats finding someone who can be elected. we have to find a candidate who is acceptable to the middle 60% of the electorate. the 20% to the left and the 20% to the right have been both out of step with america. lets return this country to the middle--john edwards can do just thathttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23183Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:20:16 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23183Vince Williams, Dubuque, IOWAI made the Edwards/Obama prediction for the Dem ticket back on November 15th... view it on OpEdNews.com by finding articles by Vince Williams (ACTORguy). What will be the "SWIFT-BOAT" type smears, though, will include trying to say neither one has foreign policy experience, AND no doubt they'll play the race card. That's how low they are. However, both Edwards and Obama are knowledgable about history and smart, unlike Bush and his gang. Edwards/Obama are an awesome ticket and very electable. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23184Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:21:00 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23184Rich, Pittsburgh, PAThe man is nothing more then the tried and true lib class warfare player. That is all he has and the man is loaded. Maybe he can sue his way into the oval office. Maybe you can post this once Chris.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23185Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:22:50 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23185Brad Wick, Chicago, Il.Having met the former Senator I was impressed with his "genuineness." He appears capable of pulling together the Robert Kennedy coalition of middle-america as well as those less fortunate and that message has to resonate with all Americans. This translates into 'electibility' as well as having solid ideas on how to fix what's not working so well in this country and abroad. Time for a major change.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23186Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:23:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23186Dominic, Boston, Ma.John Edwards sounds refreshing, after these past terrible years of the Bush's and all of his wrong doings. We need to start getting back to America. We need to protect our people, the boarders, the seniors, health care for all. I believe if John Edwards runs, he'll have a strong VP to support the ticket. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23187Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:24:13 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23187R Michel, St James, MOEdwards is great; as are most of the other Democratic candidates. Even McCain and Giuliani, on the Republican, side don't look to bad. Actually, after six years of the current administration, just about any of those that I hear are running, except Brownback, from Kansas, sound pretty good. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23189Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:27:00 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23189Marilyn H. Brockton MAI voted for Mr. Edwards in the Massachusetts primary, but because he was with John Kerry I could not vote for there ticket. What I would like to see is someone (Mr. Edwards) going after the insurance companies they are getting away with murder.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23190Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:28:06 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23190Bill Buffington, East Berlin, PAdisney, Gulliani would beat Obama hands down. McCain would likely do the same. Edwards would be a much better national candidate, as his appeal(and Elizabeth's) should resonate nationally.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23191Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:29:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23191Kevin E. SomervilleFor the Democrates to win the independent vote they need, they are going to have to convince those voters that they have loosened the ties to labor, trial lawyers and other historic special interests. Voters voted AGAINST Republicans, not FOR Democrats. Edwards history as an aggressive trial lawyer does not comfort indpendents.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23192Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:29:58 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23192Chuck Wentzel, Mobile, ALHow about an Edwards-Byrd ticket. That would just about show the party for what it is. Better yet, Edwards-Byrd-Clinton-Obama-Kennedy-Carter-Pelosi-Kerry-Clinton-Carville-Sharpton. The campaign slogan could be "Surrender First" or even "We Got a Little Something Fer Yah!" or even "Viva la Mexico!" or "Viva la France" or "Where's Mine?" My money is on Newt Gingrich. Intelligent, articulate, not-PC whipped, visionary, patriotic, etc. The best thing that could happen to the Republican party would be for Hillary Rodam Clinton to win the nomination and then put Obama in the VP slot. This, of course, after they have trashed one another in the primaries.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23193Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:33:15 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23193maryann mortimer, Charlotte, NCHow ironic that John Edwards has announced his candidacy on a day that the nation is mourning the death of former President Gerald Ford. Could there be more of a contrast than that between the plain-spoken, modest Ford and the slick, oportunistic Edwards? Even his choice of the Ninth Ward in New Orleans as the site for announcing his candidacy appears calculating. I might remind readers that far from being concerned with the needs of the people of North Carolina whom he represented in the Senate, he was off and running for president after just two years in that august body. There are many good, experienced potential candidates vying for the Democratic nomination. Why choose one whose main experience is running for president with little of substance in terms of political accomplishments?http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23194Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:34:16 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23194SKF ORLANDO FLI will vote for Edwards ~ Even better Edwards/Hillary or Edwards/Obama either is far better then letting this war go on any longer. Stop pouring 1/2 a trillion dollars in to Iraq and use that money at home and around the world to teach us all how to take better care of our earth. We should stop all dependence on oil. With this kind of money it should not be that hard.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23196Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:37:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23196Judy Howell, Laguna Hills, CaliforniaFINALLY we Democrats have a candidate who can actually win! Edwards seems like the breath of fresh air sorely needed by the US. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23198Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:39:07 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23198gary boggsI voted for Edwards the last time. He was right on when he spoke about "two Americas". It is even more appropriate now. Hillary can't win and Obama probably can't win. Both will be trashed by the conservative media and the "right wing conspiracy" http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23200Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:43:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23200AlysonHe lacks experience and I don't believe he can win. Biden is the one Democrats should be begging to run. He has experience and can win. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23201Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:44:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23201Jim MerrittHow can anybody think of Edwards as having universal appeal when even the Southerners among us cringe at his accent? No one outside of South Carolina can listen to him speak without wincing. Image is important, and he certainly does not sound like a President of all the U.S. I hope he spends a large part of the upcoming year with a diction coach. Otherwise, he'll have no chance in the national election.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23202Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:44:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23202Joe C., Orlando, FLThe timing of President Ford's death and John Edward's announcement is apropos. If elected, he would be known as another "healing President".http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23203Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:45:10 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23203BG Grand Forks, NDAnybody that I think can whip Hillery will get my vote, and I feel like at this time, I think Edwards is the guy to whip her behind, and run her back to New York!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23204Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:45:21 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23204JC Flanagan, San Francisco, CAThe only Dem that stands a chance in 2008 would be a centrist Dem, one who could pull the Midwest back into the "Blue" column, and one that can appeal to independent, swing voters everywhere. The Dems will take the coasts, it is the Midwest that holds the keys to the White House. Obama and Clinton are DOA in these parts--take it to the bank. Personally, I doubt that Edwards could pull them but he has time to position himself as the only alternative to what will surely be a formidable Republican backed by the machine. I was disheartened when Bayh pulled out of the race; he was the best shot for the Dems in my mind. Perhaps an Edwards/Bayh ticket can do the job.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23205Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:45:28 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23205Mike Smith, Raleigh NCIt's interesting that Edwards is better liked the farther away you get from his home. I would vote for his wife - but not for him. He basically became a Senator to set the stage for a presidential run - maybe he's running for President to become Sec General of the UN....http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23206Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:45:50 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23206The Edge, Maco GAIsn't a big part of what has been wrong the past 12 years in large part caused by big business interests? A trial lawyer that sues big business is exactly what we need. It is time for someone to stand up for the majority of the American people, not just for the wealthy top 1%. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23207Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:46:50 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23207Gary Dessen,Lancaster,PAI feel the people in our party need to remember that we need a candidate that can win the election. While the idea of Hillary or Obama is novel it will not win the election. However, I believe that an Edwards/Obama ticket would produce our best chance for victory!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23208Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:48:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23208Janette Sexton, Pasadena, TexasI heard John's message firsthand in early 2004, and it resonated with me. I believe John Edwards is the "right man at the right time" to help restore this country's moral authority, draw down our troops in Iraq, strengthen our middle class, guarantee health care for every single American, lead the fight against global warming, and break our addiction to oil. Count me enthusiastically in! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23210Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:50:04 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23210Randy Hatfield, Amarillo, TXJohn Edwards, as is true of Obama, has a pretty face but not enough experience or maturity for the awsome job of President. Star quality can get you a nomination for President in the spring and summer, but the experience factor takes over in the voting booth in November. There are many democrat governors with the political and executive expereince to qualify them for the Presidency. These young men may someday qualify, but for now, bring on a more mature and proven leader.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23211Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:51:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23211chris, Eagle, COIf the right-wingers want a true moral family in the White House, then the Edwards are it. They have faced the greatest of adversities with grace and dignity, walking away with greater humility and understanding. They are smart,kind and open. John and his family can bring a new, bright leadership to this country. I feel like there is a light at the end of the dark 6 year tunnel we have been in!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23213Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:52:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23213fiesal khanIm happy to see John Edwards in the race...Edwards/Obama would get my votehttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23214Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:52:44 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23214norbert bauer jackson michiganDraft Gore.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23216Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:55:03 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23216Corky Bogert Port Deposit, MDIt seems to me that the most intelligent, candid candidate of the group that have appeared on your show is Joe Biden. Why is it, do you think, that he hasn't been able to get much traction in the early stages of the race? Yes, he loves to hear himself speak, but it's usually a whole lot more interesting and forthright than most others My preferences (in Order) are Biden, Clinton, Edwards, Obama and virtually any other breathing non Republican!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23217Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:55:23 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23217Bill, Chicago ILJohn Edwards is trial lawyer. Can we pick soemone lower on the moral food chain ? He personally abused the tax code on some enormous profits. He is a slick polished guaranteed loser.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23218Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:57:36 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23218Roland BoggioJohn Edwards is the only true Democrat running. His two-Americas message, says it all. I will vote for him in the primary and November.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23219Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:00:27 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23219Trish B, St. Louis MOJohn Edwards is for the working classes of America and would be the perfect choice for the Democratic nominee! The Republicans don't have anyone that could oppose a Edwards/Obama ticket & win. John Edwards is what this country needs & it can't happen too soon. Let's get Bush & his Republican croonies out of the White House! Enough of our soldiers have died & in vain just so Bush & Cheney can line their pockets with the spoils from the Iraqi oilfields. Edwards has my vote!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23220Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:01:23 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23220Dutch, Rydal, PAPlease, do we really want a ambulance chasing trial lawer who is a mouth piece for big labor sitting in the White House? The two things the Democrats need less of is mush-mouth Southerners and Massachuestts politicians.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23221Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:03:06 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23221Johnny Sanabria Huntington Beach, caI Voted for him and I will vote for him again. I think of John Edwards as a person who will bring stability and security to this country. We need leadership and someone who knows what America needs not what big companies and corporations need. EDWARD 08 FOR PRESIDENThttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23222Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:03:54 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23222Faith Levine, Weston, FLChris: Enjoy your show nightly. We need a person, possibly John Edwards is the one, who can re-energize our American spirit and soul. I feel that the Bush administration has up rooted that soul. Working together as a nation, the way we did during Roosevelt's administration or John F. Kennedy's administration, is when America is at its best. For too long we have become selfish as a nation and we need to rethink our attitudes and show the future generations what the American Spirit is really about.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23225Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:06:36 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23225jetcrii dont vote BUT i will if Edwards wins the democratic nomination. I think he needs to consider Obama for a running mate. It would bring sensibility back to our country.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23226Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:06:36 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23226Greg, Lexington, KentuckyObama and Hillary can draw crowds and cash, but by November one would be exposed as OBambi and the other would leave voters with a cold Chillary. John Edwards can attract new faces with new ideas and restore our image in the world. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23227Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:06:37 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23227Jay Whitehead, West Orange, NJLike Bill Clinton in 1992, John Edwards has no bankroll. And like our former president, John Edwards is infinitely more electable, financially trustworthy and campaign-ready than any other potential candidate in the D-field. His message, "take action," resonates strong with me and all those who are sick of the R-team flushing away America's moral, social and financial strength. Here's what it means to you and me: "raise money now for this campaign." That's the action I'm taking. What about you?http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23228Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:06:51 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23228kel, phila,PAI pray that God will put a president in office of His choosing. Think about that for a minute. Democrat or Republican..does it really matter if the person is one of true character. One who will put the better of the country ahead of his own will. We need to stop bashing those in office and start praying for them, regardless of their political affiliation. WE need to be praying for those who will be taking office in the next election. Political parties aside...we are ONE NATION UNDER GOD. Let's not forget that.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23229Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:08:09 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23229Marti, Syracuse, NYI had a difficult time stopping laughing at the image of an Edwards/Hillary ticket. Anyone who thinks she would even entertain a second spot hasn't seen the look in her eye! I'll go for the Edwards/Obama ticket anytime AND for a 16 year Obama influence! It'll take that long for him to role model America out of the bad habits of the Republicans!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23230Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:08:37 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23230Mylon L. Stark, Oskaloosa, IowaMy wife and I had the incredible pleasure of 1) campaigning for Senator Edwards in his last campaign, and 2) being present when he spoke recently at William Penn University. Voters - Citizens: this is a person of integrity, GENUINE family values, articulation, expansive knowledge base, and vision for our country. My wife and I have already committed to the Edwards '08 Campaign, and look forward to working hard. The hard work we seek is on behalf of those willing to roll up their sleeves and rebuild the destruction of the past 6 years. Doubters: learn who and what Senator Edwards is. To pre-judge, out of ignorance, would be a sad decision indeed. It is imperative that a viable Democratic candidate is offered in '08. I fear the Republican potential candidates, as they stand today, would be little more than articulate George Bush clones. Senator Edwards deserves a good, hard look as our President, for we have not had a legitimate White House resident for 6 years.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23231Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:09:03 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23231Rob Rakossy, East Brunswick, NJI am shocked that Biden is not getting more play, more media touting, and more excitement. He is exactly what this country needs right now. A no nonesense man who also has enough expertise in so many areas that he can really use his political capital to get things done, both in congress as well as on the global stagehttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23232Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:10:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23232Alene Watkins - Atlanta GAHow refreshing it would be to have Edwards in the White House...He has family values, and is what the United States needs to get us back to the country we were once know for.. I think he and the late president Gerald Ford shared some of the same ideas on this Bush war in Iraq. Bring it on home Mr. Edwardshttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23235Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:13:10 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23235Lori, Cary, NCJohn Edwards didn't do a thing for North Carolinians as Senator. He shouldn't even get credit for serving a full term since he spent approximately a third of the time campaigning. The labor unions support him, yet he is from one of the most unfriendly states with regard to worker and union rights. What has he accomplished while in public service? Of course, in the private sector we can thank him for contributing to the high cost of health insurance (someone has to pay for the multimillion dollar lawsuits that made him rich).http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23237Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:16:15 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23237Mark, Dunkirk, NYThe process needs John Edwards in, just like it needs a Joe Biden or anyone else who wants to run. It was unfortunate the Evan Bayh dropped out. Edwards has done this once before which should give him an edge in the perils of a campaign. As of right now, he would get my early vote, but there is still some vetting to do on the rest of the field. He may be a trial lawyer but he started with nothing and has experienced personal tragedy, all building blocks for someone seeking the office of the Presidency. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23238Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:19:05 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23238Still HopingIt is about time the Dem's have someone I WILL VOTE FOR! I am a REPUBLICAN looking for a reason to change, JOHN EDWARDS is my reason. With EDWARDS as president and OBAMA as Vice President....I am voting Dem's this time! TAHNK YOU FOR GETTING JOHN EDWARDS to run WITHOUT John Kerry! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23239Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:19:30 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23239Fred Bridges Mooresville, North CarolinaJohn Edwards is from North Carolina. Guess what? He did not even win his own state in 2004. His platform is based on "Poverty in America". John Edwards is still an extreme left wing liberal and his socialists ideas must not prevail. Vote for Conservative Republicans.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23240Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:22:29 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23240Lew, CAAfter the past six years of the village idiot and his cronies, the Democrats have their best chance ever to take back the presidency. Please don't blow it! Hillary has too many negative feelings and may not be able to overcome them. Barack Obama is riding high in the polls but his perceived inexperience may hurt him, plus the Bradley effect. Joe Biden is very knowledgeable and experienced but suffers from foot-in-mouth-disease. I think Edwards has a good chance of making it. And if Obama agreed to be his running mate, I think they would be very strong.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23242Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:24:35 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23242Tito, Whittier, CAWinning ticket? Edwards/Obama, and don't tell mamma!!! Let's move America to the front again with these two afterburners.. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23245Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:33:01 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23245Julie, San Antonio TXI'll be blunt. The Democrats know the presidency is their's to lose in '08 and will not jeopardize votes by running a black male or any female. So John Edwards wins the nomination by virtue of being a white male. However, I could see him putting Obama on the ticket as VP.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23259Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:49:15 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23259Elizabeth, Chicago, ILI will gladly cast my vote for John Edwards, he is the main reason I voted Kerry/Edwards in '04. Unlike the current president, he has a brain and he uses it. It's time to start taking care of America, in particular middle-class Americans such as myself, who are going broke fueling their cars and, despite making a decent buck that gave me success and security in the Clinton years, has plummeted me near bankruptcy under the Bush administration. It's time to be concerned about our people at home and that includes bringing back the young men and women who so valiantly stay in Iraq fighting for what?! Go John Edwards! Add Obama as the VP and it's a done deal.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23260Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:51:10 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23260Charlie FetscherSome really good commentary. I agree there's a real opportunity for a Dem to win in 2008. I also agree they had the same opportunity in '00 and '04 but nominated mushes. If we're not on the way out of Iraq a year from now, Hillary can and will win. Otherwise, McCain/Lieberman or McCain/Giuiliani sweeps the nation.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23261Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:52:39 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23261GER, Seattle WACorrection to this statement: "Edwards is running well ahead in Iowa". NO is he not running well ahead nor even ahead, he is TIED with OBAMA (22%, clinton 10%). In the Iowa gen election poll Obama or Edwards (both 43-42%) are ahead of the Repubs (McCain or Guiliani 38-39%). Of all the possible candidates from both parties, Obama is the only one that has the intellect, charima, leadership potential to be a GREAT President not just another office holder.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23263Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:53:00 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23263Jeff Hendrickson from OhioJohn Edwards (and his wonderful wife) has a much better shot at winning in Nov. 2008 than anyone else except for Wes Clark. Edwards looks good on camera (whereas John McCain, the likely Repub. candidate, looks like his face is going to explode any moment). John can appeal to rich and poor alike, because he really does care about the poor and the working-class, but he is actually rich. He's going to be labeled again as that money-grubbing ambulance chasing lawyer, but it really can work for him if he just embraces the fact that he's good at defending those who have been injured by others. I still prefer Wes Clark because of the many military problems that will still be draining this country in 2008.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23264Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:55:16 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23264Pamela Butler, Los Angeles, CAHillary Clinton and Barack Obama are both fine candidates but we need someone who can win and win big!! I’m an African American and I know that America is not ready for a woman and they are not ready for an African American. This is the sad truth and Democrats better realize it so we can change this country into what it should be - back to the greatest country in the world. Edwards reminds me of my favorite president, Bill Clinton – minus the skirt chasing. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23266Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:56:22 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23266Next Of Kin/Erie,PAEdwards/Obama all the way...This combo will "clean house" of any of those deep-pocketed right-wingers in bed with oil companies and viagra producers. Our people need jobs...not big business getting tax breaks to move their operations overseas. As others have said, the centrist position is the most appealing for any candidate to take. Too far left or right means special interests. We are all Americans, with the need to provide for our families, have affordable healthcare, and be able to retire with dignity...hopefully before we die first. As for the ties with labor...remember these are the only ones fighting for fair wages and benefits such as healthcare and pensions to name a few. Big business knows what the efforts of our labor are worth. Most of them simply don't want a middle class nor do they want "Joe Q. Public" to enjoy the same things as they do, or even a fraction thereof! History has shown that greed and corruption are the downfalls of capitalism. I'm proud to be an American and believe in the system as it was intended. We've forgotten about the people somewhere along the way, and it is essential that we get back on that path. A John Edwards/Barack Obama ticket provides us with the best chance of this turnaround, but it will probably take at least two terms to repair the problems.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23267Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:58:13 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23267Harry Blanas.Anchorage Alaska, 5616 S. Tahiti L. Z.C. 99507All others democrats and repablicans alike in the packs in their parties to run for prasidend in the year 2008 probably are good people. But mr.John Edwards Has the vition to unite the country . The freshness of the imagination to meke one America. The ability to restore faith of the oeople on our leaders.Reduse the defisit. get beter payinn jobs for americans .To restore respect and dignity of the country arrownd the world in other nations.And the aura of the late presidend John F. Kenedy. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23269Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:59:08 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23269Andrew, Germantown MDJohn Edwards has several things in his favor! 1.) He is unemployed and looking for a job. 2.) Plus all the things Chris highlighted above. 3.) And "59,028,111" Americans voted for him to be a heart beat away from the top job he is only candidate in the race that can say that. I don't see Kerry or Cheney running in 2008. Historically Americans have always voted men to the white house that are nationally know for years, Bill Clinton Jimmy Carter are the only two that buck that trend in recent years. It's going to be an interesting race and it's not going to be over until Nov. 2008. PS Man that seems like such a life time away!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23271Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:01:04 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23271Susan Brewer, The Woodlands, TXFor two years I have stated that I would support Hillary if she ran...that changed the moment John Edwards said he was running. The reason is simple, I want a democrat in the White House, Edwards can win.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23272Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:05:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23272Christopher, Elizabeth, IndianaI agree fully that Dem's can not afford to take the chance of running a black male or any female in 08. It is to much of a risk factor this time around. Would be great to try if we were coming out of two term Democrat President.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23273Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:06:00 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23273Terry LambI would LOVE seeing John Edwards as President!! What a breath of fresh air after the gloomy Nightmare that is the Bush MisAdministration!! Edwards/Obama VP with Hillary dealing with Health Care, Gore with the Enviroment/ Global Warming, Wesley Clark with Defense, Joe Biden and Russ Feingold in the Cabinet--WORKS FOR ME!! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23275Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:09:28 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23275Chris McGurty, Waltham, MAWhile Edwards has some admirable qualities, the fact remains he did nothing for the 04 ticket. He could not even help to win his hometown. It pains me to admit this, Cheney trounced him in that debate in 04! With all the ever changing world events going on, there is only one guy who I want in the White House!. JOE BIDEN!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23276Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:14:01 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23276Doreen Consiglio, Ypsilanti, MichiganA little education is in order for those who attack John Edwards/trial lawyer for contributing to the high cost of health insurance. About 1% of the cost of health care is directly attributable to lawsuits. Google it. Funny how everyone hates lawyers until they need one. As for "President John Edwards," he seems well suited for the job. He's intelligent, articulate and understands the world we live in. All attributes sorely missing from the current oval office resident. Experience would be a factor if I hadn't witnessed the absolute worldwide disaster the current administration has created with some of the most experienced public servants available. Edwards gets my support and Elizabeth will be a tremendous advantage for his campaign.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23277Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:15:38 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23277LES DILLINEdwards has been very busy working throughout the World to try to improve the impressions that the World has about America. Bush has done his best in turning the World against us. Edwards has not forgotten what needs to be done in USA in improving healthcare, poverty and the middle class.What about a ticket of Edward's at the top and a v.p. Obama. That could take care of the next 16 years and give Obama some more seasoning.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23278Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:18:28 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23278Brian J. - Rockville, MDI'm all in on Edwards. However the same concerns will be leveled against him as for Obama, not much experience. Didn't matter with Bush since he had the family name, but those opposed to Edwards will try to "Swiftboat" him as a tort lawyer, or "Slick Eddie" or some such nonsense. Already my right wing friends are on the attack against Edwards, maybe they are afraid of his chnaces? A young, handsome candidate like Edwards vs. McCain ? With all due respect to Sen. McCain, I'll take Edwards. Of course the opponents to McCain are already painting him as "The Manchurian Candidate".http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23283Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:28:53 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23283Richard Richardson, Baltimore, MDWhat about Gore-Edwards in 08. Gore won the popular vote in 00 and could do it again if he ran hard against the Republican attack machine.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23284Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:31:05 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23284Nadia Hassan Alpharetta, GeorgiaActually, the latest poll from Iowa shows Obama and Eduwards tied for first place. The polls that show him ahead significantly are kind of outdated. Also, Frank Luntz focused grouped him with IA and NH voters, and found that his support dropped like a prom dress after the dance. Edwards isn't as electable as people think...Republicans will pound him to the absolute ground on issues of moral fuzziness the same way they did with Al Gore and John Kerry. His wife's comments on Mrs. Clinton might also turn off suburban women. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23287Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:34:15 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23287Jeff, Roseville CAI can't believe that everyone is so blindly pledging allegiance to this Edwards clown! This is a guy that is a trial lawyer that won his fortune in a class action lawsuit based on junk science! Although, maybe Michael J. Fox will be healed and Christopher Reeve will be risen from the dead! You must remember he PROMISED Christopher Reeve would walk if he and John Kerry were elected in 04! He'll look like a deer in the headlights again on the national stage and get crushed again, but it was a nice photo op in New Orleans!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23290Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:35:44 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23290Ryan Leenders, Everett WashingtonIt is time to take our country back from this so-called president, George W. Bush. It is also important not to turn it over to his buddies, the Republicans, who place a higher worth on the richest 1%; as if that makes you more worthy of clean air, affordable health care, livable wages, comprehensive education, an un-tampered vote, or guaranteed retirement. Who ever we side with (my choices are Obama or Edwards) must be willing and able to put the constitution back on the agenda of american government!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23292Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:37:43 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23292Lowell Cromer Aurora, IndianaWe need someone to run for president who can talk to the Nation without a smirk on their face as Bush and Cheney always do. Someone who does not have the attitude of it's my way or the highway. Whether that's Edwards, Biden or someone else, we just need someone we can look up too as our leader. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23296Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:44:14 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23296Shaun Johnston, Lewisville, TXI'm from Texas, and I think that for all of the people who voted for Bush (once or twice) and now are saying "Well, we thought he'd do better, etc..." should have KNOWN BETTER after the first time! Based upon what the media showed us of Edwards in '04, I believe he'd do 100000% better than Bush Jr. could even hope to do for our country! Good luck to him!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23297Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:45:12 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23297Karl Boettner, Spokane, Wash.IF John Edwards promises to get us out of Iraq NOW (and admit he made a mistake in authorizing Bush to invade Iraq in the first place) and IF his advocacy for the poor and disenfranchised is matched with real program proposals that he promises to implement, I might bite. Otherwise, he's just a pretty face. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23298Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:47:11 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23298J Merle Stanley, Westchester, NYJohn Edwards is a HIGHLY electable candidate. No skeletons in his closet, a Washington "Outsider," liberal Democrat who's not from the northeast. (although for the life of me I can't understand why the last of those things matters.......then again yes I do, JFK envy.)Anyway, he just might be the real deal. I'm a Clark-Democrat. But, I'll vote for Edwards if he's the nominee.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23301Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:51:28 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23301RC, Washington,DCI really like John Edwards. It amazes me that people hate trial attorneys but when some people believe they are legally wronged, some are the first to yell, "I'm going to get an attorney." I work for attorneys and I will be the first to say that they can be difficult. But judge John Edwards on other grounds not just because he was a trial attorney. Ask if he helped people who were clearly wronged. Also, attorneys are in the business of making money too even if they are overpaid. I love Bill Clinton but Hillary stays to much "on the fence." Also, I don't like her stand on the Iraq war. As an independent, I would really like to see an Edwards/Obama or Biden/Edwards ticket. Joe Biden is knowledgeable. He is not afraid to speak his mind and the guy is pretty tough. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23302Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:52:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23302Brian O'Toole, Buford, GAJohn Edwards is a tax and spend Democrat. Think about it. He wants universal health care coverage for every American. Who would run that social program, the government, we already saw how capable the government is when it comes to running large social programs, ie. Social Security. Let's really bankrupt America. John Edwards is a trial lawyer who has forced medical malpractice premiums to rise. Who pays for it in the end consumers when their medical bills arrive. Edwards is bad news for America.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23304Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:53:13 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23304Kathy Mayo, Fort Worth, TXI second Suzanne's comment that Edwards rings of JFK - this country needs someone they can actually look up to and respect. Unlike Bush, he was not born into wealth. He rose to where he is now on his own determination and strength, which gives him a different perspective on life. Is it possible to have someone in the White House who is genuine? I'd like to find out. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23305Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:54:07 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23305Paul SimonEdwards can win in November; Obama and Clinton are not electable!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23306Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:54:54 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23306Michael Flake, Larchmont, NYA winning candidate is either a Vice-President or a governor. Kennedy was the last Senator to win the White House. That means Edwards is out as his only elective office was in the Senate. Forget Obama, Hillary, and Biden. Look for Gore to get back in as a former VP (think Nixon) and sucessful governors like Bill Richardson from New Mexico. (think Bill Clinton). Richardson has foreign policy experience and is half-hispanic. That's an intriguing combination.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23307Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:56:03 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23307Jim Allen, Santa Fe, NMI would vote for Edwards over any Republican, and over Mrs Clinton and the untried Obama. BUT: Edwards has got to learn to speak English. Know what I mean? http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23308Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:56:35 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23308B. O'Toole- Buford, GAYea would not want you to present a conservative view on a liberal websitehttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23312Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:05:16 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23312Nate, Boyds, MDMy take on the political winds blowing in the US is that America is looking for a fresh face and fresh ideas. With the sagging popularity of George W. Bush, anyone that seems like a retread or a Bush clone will be a turnoff to a lot of voters. I think that's why Obama is so interesting and such a draw at political rallies and why John Edwards will be a formidable candidate. Even though he ran in 2004, he still is somewhat of a fresh face on the political circuit. Meanwhile, there seems to be a love affair with the media and Hillary Clinton but it will be interesting to see what the voters think of her. I for one want a new face and new ideas out there so my motto is "ABC", Anybody But Clinton. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23313Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:05:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23313Ryann, Winnipeg, CanadaEdwards has been appropriately trying to build his foreign policy cred over the last couple of years, but am I the only one who was disappointed the other night to see that his wife had done little to improve her image/style? Superficial maybe, but it's going to have to improve if he wants to be the candidate. He comes off as so shiny and ageless that it's a visual let down when you meet his better half. She's brilliant to be sure but needs a makeover! On the other hand, Barack Obama and his wife Michelle exude that super couple power that everyone wishes they had. They've got looks and smarts! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23350Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:01:32 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23350Kathy WestI would vote for him, anything would be better then what we have currently. Maybe John can restore the American Peoples faith in our country. Bush and Cheney sold us all out. Only God knows how these two sleep at night while the rest of the country goes to Hell in a hand bag. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23351Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:06:13 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23351Patty Bloeser Duluth, GASaw John Edwards speak in ATL 2004....he has a warmth that translates. Is he tough enough? YES....he has already been through the worst thing that can happen...the loss of a child....he can go the distance and I will be there for him.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23353Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:07:11 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23353J Podhola, Independence MOI can not even wait! Is it 2007 yet? I mean can all the political junkies begin their feast yet? I can't wait. As for Edwards? I think he is great. I cant wait for 2008http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23354Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:11:44 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23354Larry, Clarksburg, WVEdwards-Obama 2008! I love it!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23355Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:13:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23355Scott Fixari, Columbus,OHElectability. There is no other single issue that is more important for the Democratic Party going into 2008. Unfortunately, a large percentage of our country will never get beyond Obama's race. There is also a significant number of voters who will not vote for a woman as President, let alone a woman who is disliked by as many within her own party. The Democratic Party would be making a terrible error in judgement if they nominate ANY candidate for President who has that kind of handicap from the start. John Edwards is articulate, bright, charismatic and most importantly "electable". He is an ideal candidate to run in 2008. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23356Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:15:11 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23356CC in Kansas CityI wish we could vote today! With Bush in the Whitehouse for 2 more years, there may not be anything or anyone left in 08. Just a giant charred burnt mark that used to be our country. He has single-handedly turned the ENTIRE WORLD against us! Can we all say "Impeach"?http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23357Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:18:51 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23357Shea McCandless, Bertioga, Brazil--Carlsbad, CAAny candidate who insists on maintaining worldwide moral superiority should rethink his words. The United States is far from being seen as a 'moral' country by the rest of the world, no matter how much self deluded citizens want to believe. Guiding morality is not, and never should be the shining light of a politician, especially in world contexts. That said, if John Edwards can actually pursue 4 of his principal points, Healthcare, respect abroad, someone finally engaging poverty, and dealing fairly with the middle class, he would be a worthy candidate. Time will tell. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23358Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:20:27 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23358Keith, CaliforniaJohn Edwards couldn't close the deal in 2004 and can't close it now. Following an incompetent president with one who clearly lacks foreign policy experience is absolutely the wrong thing to do.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23359Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:22:30 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23359Robert Lahr, Brooklyn Park, MN.A large number of people in this country do not follow politics and vote on looks, personality, and how the canidate comes across with his message. John Edwards has all these features and would win the presidentency, but are the democrats smart enough to nominate him?http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23480Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:59:09 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23480David Horne, Marion, Mass.For all the carpers about trial lawyers, don't forget that Abraham Lincoln was a trial lawyer, and had very little government experience before he was elected president. Bottom line--while almost any democrat should be able to win this time around, only Edwards polls ahead of McCain. Go Edwards.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23481Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:12:51 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23481Karlovy, Beijing, ChinaHey Nach667,Mount Clemens,Mi "No more Republicans and no more southerners!" Does that mean you don't wamt to see another LBJ, Carter, or Clinton? http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23485Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:40:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23485Robert Pike Canyon Country, CaliforniaUnlike Phil Angelides, Edwards won't have to deal with the ulgy factor. He will take 40 to 60% of the women vote from Hillary cause he is good looking. Just like Jack Kennedy. Look this guy has been vetted as a U.S. Senator, a Presidential contender, and a Vice-Presidential running mate. He is gonna raise tons of money from labor and the legal community. His competititon, except for Dennis Kucinich all voted for the war as did Edwards, so that is a wash. He will get the nomination on the first ballot unless he messes up his stump speech or his wife has a relapse and he has to drop out. His Republican opponent John McCain has anger problems from being a POW. As a Vietnam Vet I hate to assail the Senator but he is flat wrong on Iraq.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23489Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:44:08 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23489Javier Cossio, Downey, CAAt last, a man with a vision. John Edwards is the only Democrat that can defeat any GOP candidate in November '08. Let's face it, the country is not ready to elect a woman as president, especially one as "polarizing" as Hillary. People, she is not Bill. She is her own entity, and she is trying to prove that. That, compounded with the already heavy baggage she carries, further hurts her already limited chance of winning a general election. Moreover, If a lack of political experience was (or is) a knock against Edwards, so it follows that the same applies for Obama--but to a greater extent. Edwards is the only candidate who is not out to prove anything (a la Hillary) but rather following his heart, his passion, to help every man, woman, and child in America, by leading this country towards becoming what it once was: The greatest country in the world. Thanks to Mr. Edwards, we can restore the latter. Thanks to Mr. Edwards, HOPE has been restored.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23491Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:49:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23491Jeff Dawson, CanadaAs I political junkie I enjoy following most aspects of American politics from my perch here in western Canada, especially the race for President which seems to take place more often than I wash my car, but that's another story for another day...My question is two fold---when we hear over and over that Hillary can't win is there a reason for this, is it that she is too liberal for the general population or is there another concrete reason? I saw Kerrey as being quite liberal and he only missed out by the hair on his chinny chin chin, so I just don't get how any Democratic candidate 'cannot win the White House' when the Dems lost by such very narrow margins in the past two attempts when Bush 43 was much more popular than he is today. Sure he isn't running in 08 but the Republican candidate will have to carry at least some of Bush's baggage I would imagine. As well, I sense there will be a greater desire for change in 08 than was the case in 04....My other point concerns Edwards and his potential running mate...methinks he is more apt to select a more experienced VP than, say, Obama if for no other reason than to balance the lack of experience card he represents and the fact he is and looks young...Then there is the issue that no Senator since Kennedy has won in the past 4+ decades---it seems VP's and State Govenor's are much more likely presidential options and New Mexico's Bill Richardson makes an interesting option on that count....The other point that I agree with is that the guy/gal who gets outa the gate early with quick decisive wins in the primaries can push away the pretenders pretty quickly if all goes well and Edwards is well set up to do just that---or so it seems...I look forward to hearing your thoughts. Happy New Year and best wishes, JDhttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23492Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:54:22 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23492Chris Maurich, Wakefield, KansasJohn Edwards / Kathleen Sebelious ( Kansas Gov. ) Gov. Sebelious was in Time Magazine as a potential contender...Just a thought. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23493Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:57:22 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23493Rose KretzI think the Edwards/Obama ticket would be a shoo-in. It.s time to get out of the smog and smell the roses !http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23494Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:57:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23494Edvard Elghammar, San Diego, CASince George W. Bush was "selected" president in 2000, this country has been in a reactive mode, fueled by the fear-mongering of Bush's evil genius, Karl Rove. John Edwards offers vision, hope, a compelling life story and remarkable sincerity and intelligence (this last has never "played" well in the past with the electorate). If he can address the lack of foreign affairs experience/"strong leader" thing satisfactorily, he'd be very, very formidable. Although I'd be personally thrilled by an Edwards/Obama ticket, I don't think this addresses the lack of foreign affairs-experience thing. As for Hillary, she could be so much more effective remaining in the Senate. I hope hubris won't push her into a race she's destined to lose!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23498Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:01:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23498Trevor Blank, Bloomington, IndianaThe dems need an Edwards/ Bayh ticket to pull this one off. Evan Bayh is a seasoned politican (served as Governor and now long-time senator of Indiana) and is a friend of John Edwards. He is a great moderate that would help move the ticket to the middle, where it should be. Hillary kind of frightens me (she doesn't seem electable on the national level) and Obama seems like a Howard Dean-esque flavor-of-the-month! I like Edwards' ideas on health care and education. After 8 terrible years of Bush, we need a time of transition. Whoever is elected next, be it GOP or Dem, will have to do a lot of work to heal the damage done. Edwards/ Bayh '08!!!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23500Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:08:53 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23500HelenHow abt. Edwards & Nancy Pelosi? We need a womans' perspective in this political arena. It's time to vote people in who do not allow their religious beliefs to interfere with other peoples beliefs.This bunch that is in have been in SO long,since before President Ford,it's like the Monarchy in England,God!! They have got to go.They own us, we just pay the bills.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23502Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:09:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23502Brad A., San Diego, CAThe reason to not vote for John Edwards can be found on his own Web site: http://johnedwards.com/about/issues/ His stance on the issues? 5 bullet points. He's all fluff and no substance. Apparently he hasn't developed much depth since 2004 when I was working the campaign trail in New Hamshire and was amazed by his ability to talk for an hour and never say anything. Compare him to my candidate of choice (Wes Clark, http://securingamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3) and I think it's clear why I support a proven leader over a flash-in-the-pan with a nice smile. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23506Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:14:05 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23506 Keith Matheny, Sagamore Hills, OHTruth is, at this juncture, Edwards is probably the only Dem. who is going to talk the ISSUES that middle class america really needs to deal with. Human history has always been about class warfare. I hope he says the things that nobody in either ruling conglomerate wants to hear! But I do. I voted for him against Kerry in the primaries last time. His positive messages' are a breath of fresh air after all the "swift boating" the bums did, first to McCain in '00 and then to Kerry in '04. Calling the ones who ansered the call, as our sons and daughters have now, un-patriotic! Funny how the dodger decided to get into a another war like that. My only surprize in November was how long it took to "throw the bums out" and lame duck Crawford's village idiot! Hope for the mass's yet! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23508Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:20:56 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23508Karren, Louisville, MississippiI am so excited that John Edwards is running for president. He can win. He has the charisma, looks, an appealing platform and a wonderful Southern drawl. I read some comments about Cheney trouncing Edwards in the 2004 debates. I disagree; Edwards held his own and even bested Cheney in some instances. Edwards is a trial lawyer and fought big business in court. That is a negative? Caused malpractice insurance to increase? We need more people who will stand up for the people against big business which controls our country, and even the world. Insurance companies made record profits; they didn't need to increase malpractice insurance; that was only their excuse in pressuring Congress to limit liability. I would love to see John Edwards as president supporting a national health insurance. Instead of spending a fortune on unnecessary wars and bridges to "nowhere", the US should have national health insurance. Norway has such a plan, and their economy is great. Since companies do not have the expense of providing health care insurance, Norway is a very attractive country. Hillary is extremely intelligent, but unfortunately, many people view her in a negative manner. Women seem to like her, but most men will not vote for her, probably because she is a woman, and an intelligent one at that. As for Obama, does anyone think it strange that suddenly in the last year, his name has been plastered all over the news as a leading candidate?? Where is this coming from? I voted for Kerry/Edwards in 2004, and if Kerry had more aggressively attacked the shameful Swiftboaters, he probably would have won. Like some others above, I would rather see a monkey in the WH than anyone remotely similar to GW. Also, should he decide to run, we need to remember that Russell Feingold voted against the resolution authorizing GW to invade Iraq. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23511Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:24:49 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23511Randy BaxterJohn Edwards has a vision, is energetic, and has leadership ability that would lead this country in the right direction.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23514Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:31:39 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23514Andrew D. StruppI have voted for every Democratic presidential nominee that I could except that I voted for Dole and against Clinton the second time Bill ran. Hillary comes from a Republican family and is power hungry. What DOES she stand for behind that smug mask? I don't care for her hard-edged, win at any cost advisors (what is his name? Wolfson or something) either. If she is nominated, I will just not vote for President at all. Rudy is a dictator and has mob ties. He has listening issues. Even if he does like opera. Never will be even-handed on the Middle East, either. We don't need someone to rile the Arabs up some more. McCain's got right-wing fever in order to get the nomination. Too old, entirely too old. Even Bush who works a four hour day is starting to show the strain of being President. I want to see public financing of campaigns. This is my number one issue because it is the key to getting the current crop of bums out. Or, force the networks to give up air time as part of their public service license. We could do with less product advertising and more thoughful political commentary, instead. Too many politicians become lobbyists and they aren't working for the Middle Class. That's for sure. Then we would have better candidates, too. Free elections are way too expensive (see pork barrel ear marks). Edwards looks good in a system where a Lieberman can win. With public financing of elections, he would face stronger opposition. Gore Vidal (Gore's cousin) said Al Gore does not have the stomach for the fight and did not want it badly enough in 2000. Do we really believe such a fundamental flaw will change? As the American dollar sinks, so does America. And Kudlow gloats about it! The investor class -- humbug. Hillary can't win and Obama definitely isn't ready or tested. He's got some Illinois skeletons in his closet. Edwards is past being impressed by private air craft and I really like HIS wife. Real common sense woman. She could beat her husband! No kidding. Wonder how John feels about that? If he picks a cabinet as well as he picked a wife, more credit to him. She has seen breast cancer and knows that life is about more than having money. Something Cheney hasn't figured out yet. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23515Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:36:03 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23515m gordonBeing an american currently living overseas (not military) I think that a lot of Edwards appeal does not resonate outside the US. I think his appeal to American's is partly his life story and also that he is that he is a familiar candidate, not necessarily the best one. I mean really, what has he done? Perhaps the best ticket would be Al Gore and Bill Richardson. Environmentally friendly, experienced at both the state and federal level, both hispanic and anglo, nothing the Republicans could match. The only other combination that hits as many of the "electibility" points would involve either Obama or H Clinton and honestly, I cannot see myself voting for either one. Clinton, not ever and Obama needs more time. Like the line in the movie, "this is a serious time and it calls for serious people". What Democrats absolutely do not need to do is put an inexperienced but charasmatic "leader" in place and think they can surround them with good staff. We have been trying that for the last 6 years and look how well that has worked.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23517Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:38:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23517EDMOND MARTINI believe in John Edwards as I did from the early previous primaries. But I have to believe balance is needed now more than anytime in my life. This means General Wesley Clark who is a true life war hero , whom was always there and not AWOL and/or deferred for life like most in office at least until Jan 07. General Clark only ran as a democrat because as we all know well Independents cannot get the votes needed to win a presidential election. General Clark therefore was let down by the primaries by voters whom didn't feel he was a leftist democrat, for good reason He's not!!!!He has been a war commander in which no American lives were lost. He has already served his country better than any politician with the exception of maybe Eisenhour or Kennedy, whom both fought in World War theaters. The very balance required to get things done is the intelligence John Edwards and General Wes Clark already have. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23521Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:02:05 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23521Mike MathisJohn Edwards became a multimillionaire by suing not only big business but nurses, doctors and other healthcare providers who work 24/7, 365 days a year to help others. His firm (as most law firms do) would take 25-40% of the money awarded to the victim by the jury. Many of the cerebral palsy cases he won against obstetricians have been shown to have no basis in scientific fact. Yet he won by making impassioned pleas to the jury (even going so far as claiming he was feeling a dead child's voice telling him what to do) to be brave and award large sums of money. Be aware that many neurosurgeons, obstetricians and emergency room physicians are refusing to treat high risk patients or quitting altogether to avoid today's malpractice mess. John Edwards is and always will be a trial attorney. He believes that this country has too many "have nots" and will do anything in his power to get them what they deserve. Jackpot justice indeed.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23524Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:32:32 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23524Ken Snyder Columbus,OhioI want a Democrat elected to the Presidency in 2008.Clinton and Obama cannot win here in Ohio. Clinton can't carry Pennsylvania and Michigan. Neither of them would win in states like West Virginia,Kentucky,Indiana, and Missouri.To elect a President, the Democrats have to win more than the two coasts.Edwards can't win here in the midwest either.Forget Clinton,Obama, and Edwards...if you want to elect a Democrat in 2008.We need a fresh face who is not strongly associated with the liberal wing of the Democrat party. We need a moderate who will appeal to the independents. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23526Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:37:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23526Fran, Seattle, WAI'm fed up with the corruption of the past 6 years, and feel that the US and the world desperately need a visionary leader to pull us out of this mess our country is in. I can't forget that Hillary voted for the war and shifted toward the middle when she thought it was prudent. It appears to me that the best possible ticket is Edwards-Obama. Nothing was handed to either of them, and that both of them have earned their status the hard way shows their strength. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23530Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:50:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23530f. Holloway, ConnecticutIf John Edwards is sincere, he may have a good shot at the White House. We need an honest vote of the people, not a political vote. Somehow if this country is going to be honest then it should be the vote of the people, not using swing votes to elect the president. This is why you do not have the voter turn out (what for? they are going to put in who they want, not what the people really want!!) Cannot blame the people who voted, your electorial voting system is out dated. I would for once like to see the all the votes count before I die. I came from a voting family, My father drove and walked miles and miles to get people to vote (he was a small farmer) he believed in our country and our freedom, he never gave up. Our country needs a leader that will bring balance and lead us with the kind of country that will be respected and caring for our people and for those who deserve to be an american citizen. Note: Mexicans are hard working people, they will get out of bed and work for a living, you have other people who are arrogent and disrespectful who come to this country and live off of our tax dollars, they run drugs deal right in the streets but we do not send them back?? There is something wrong with our thinking and the system. Some come to get their citizenship just so they can do what they want to, these are the ones we should deport. Some of them are illegals too, they do not want to work they are the ones who come here and work the system so they donot have to work. We hard working AMERICANS support these people and educate their children who do not want to learn English. "MEXICANS are not the problem people on the high end do not see where the real problem lies. That is why we need a president and the legislature to see it from bottom up, not top down and special interest groups they are only looking out for ""1"". http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23535Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:05:59 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23535Lorraine Miller, Brevard, N..C.I would most definitely vote for John Edwards. I think he is, by far, the best chance the Democrats have to win the election for president in 2008. He has all the personal qualifications for the office and the charisma to win votes. I like his platform and sincerity. I think he is exactly what this nation needs after the debacle of the present administration. The letters that deride him from some N. C. residents do not speak for all of the people of this state. We are proud of what he is and what he stands for. Besides, I think he is the most logical candidate to win the election. I feel that an Edwards/Obama ticket would be strong.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23536Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:08:46 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23536Lorraine Miller, Brevard, N..C.I am greatly impressed by John Edwards, the man, and what he stands for. I think that Edwards/Obama ticket would be a real winner for 2008http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23538Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:34:40 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23538Vicki S, Alconbury, England The dream ticket would be Edwards/Richardson in either order. Both are men of integrity and both men possess diplomatic charm. We NEED a president that is a diplomat!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23539Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:39:22 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23539Sherry MadisonJohn Edwards is the mouthpeice of labor unions? What unions? the ProAmnesty Serive Unions which pander to illegal aliens, but not American Craft Unions like the I.B.E.W. (who recognized Lou Dobbs as the Voice of the American Working Citizen at their yearly convention in 2006) not Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. ( also an attorney) who is leading the Teamsters in a brave effort to challenge Mayor Daily's Sanctary City of Chicago, and not the Steelworkers who joined in to make Bill Nelson, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and other lefty loonies release Democratic Campaign funds from 2004 (they sued--that Hoffa, Jr.) and made it possible for 44 Blue Dog Democrats to be elected. We almost had a Democrat elected in Florida, and if he would have stooped to dirty name calling, he would be Gov.of florida. He kept his moral compass and lost the election. These American Labor Unions get up and fight for American Citizens and their jobs every day. And John Edwards with his Amnesty spam does NOT speak for them. And he sees two Americas. I do too. One Mexican. One the remments of what was once the USA. And now the pandering to Muslim men. As a woman, I find that totally scary as Muslim men consider women to worth one half of a man. To the, I am a half creature. Now where is MSNBC going with their sweetness and light articles about them?http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23540Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:40:13 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23540John Prizer, Orlando FLI am a republican in Florida who is not happy with Bush. For the Democrats to take the White House, they need to get voters like me and take a big traditionally republican state like Florida. I will not vote for Hillary. I am not sure about Obama yet, but Edwards has the best shot at getting my vote. We need a president who will put a less arrogant face on our country.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23543Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:05:29 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23543Lon Roberts, Atlanta, GAJohn Edwards clearly is the class of the Democratic field for 2008. He's a mix of Robert Kennedy and Jimmy Carter and that translates well for him. I saw him twice in 2004 in Atlanta and he's simply brillant on the stump. He's articulate and he reasonates well with people. He's got my vote! Obama and Clinton aren't electable in my opinion. I for one am tired of the 20 years of Bush and Clinton we'll have had by 2008. It's time for change and a fresh start.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23545Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:10:06 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23545Judith Kaufman, NHAfter reading all the treads and reflecting on my own campaign ground experience as an activist in NH, I'm feeling a little disappointed. The pundents are most often not correct about the wishes and the mood of the people. They are especially wrong in this election cycle. I like Edwards, I'm not sure that he is electable and I am 100% percent sure that the pundents are again wrong about the other top candidates. They both have assets. I personally haven't agreed with many of Hillary's votes since she became a senator. The question of who is electable in our country in 2008 is still an open question in my mind. I wouldn't put money on any of the top three candidates at this point in time.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23546Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:12:00 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23546Barbara Chesnik Canonsburg, Pa.If it's not Gore, then it will be Edwards for me!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23550Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:24:28 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23550Amy Robillard, Bellows Falls, Vermont, 05101John Edwards' lack of foreign policy experience should not be given ANY consideration. In view of the ineptness of the fool currently posturing about in the White House and the fool's complete inability to think or speak how anyone can critique the way John Edwards speaks is beyond me. Has anyone listened to bush lately? bush is a complete embarassment to this country with his mumbling, mispronounciations, the ever-present smirk and his total inability to recognise the mess he has created. bush is a stupid person and I personally am far more afraid of cheney. cheney is smart, cruel, and unscrupulous. Our late President Ford, with his usual restraint, said for public consumption only that he was disappointed in what cheney had become. I would love to know what he said in private. President Ford's speech and grammar was excellent, and Edwards' speech is perfectly intelligible to a New England yankee so it can't be that bad. I agree with an Edwards/Obama ticket for about as complete a change as we're going to get, and we NEED a very complete change if this country is going to survive another 50 years. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23551Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:39:38 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23551SERGIO R. BUSTAMANTEThe two Americas theme that John Edwards focuses on is definitely a good one . If he keeps pounding on it with some concrete ideas as to how to narrow the gap I think can get him elected . I hope so anyway .http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23555Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:52:39 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23555David, New York CityA dead person in the White House would do more positive things for this country than the three stooges have done (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld). Bush will go down as the absolute worst president in this countries history and it will take us over a generation to recover from the Iraq mess. Even President Ford said in an interview in 2004 that this was a BIG mistake. But Bush will go on in his stubborn idiotic way and probably send more troops in. The man is a loser and an imbicile. My point is that Edwards is the best out the other Democratic candidates and can do no worse than the bozo running this country now.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23563Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:30:01 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23563Jami, Panama City, FLI hope the democrats are smart enough to nominate him this time...I voted for him in 2004 and still think he has the best shot of winning a general election against the Republican nominee. Enough about this trial lawyer stuff...how can it be a bad thing that he has devoted his career to helping people who have been trampled by big business and those injured through no fault of their own. Just because the guy made money helping people, we fault him? No way, not me. He is the key to 2008 and I think his career history is to his advantage...http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23565Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:32:57 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23565dave cercone tinley park, illinoisJohn Edwards is a empty suit, grooming himself like Kerry the magnificent. You liberal dems will foam at the mouth as you do for Obama another empty suit but if hes elected president, he will be elected Pope at the same time, praise god.. I enjoy watching you all hyped up Chris, well I can only watch you for 3 minutes tops, so I hope I get lucky and see you interview the man who has a 12000 sq. ft house whoze for da peoplez..pullllleezehttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23568Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:47:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23568Joe P, New York, nYI couldn't agree more with some the comments made earlier, a Edwards/Obama ticket could be the only thing that could stop the Clinton colossus from running away with Democratic primary...http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23572Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:51:55 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23572J P Pillow Rockwll Texas Senator John Edwards is bright and articulate. He also feels that problems like North Korea and and Iran can be understood better and the leaders involved can be "negotiated with " and dealt with from a common understanding. That's what Neville Chamberlain thought about the issues and Nazi leaders at Munich. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23573Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:01:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23573Army Guy, Ft Bliss TXDeos Edawrds has the guts to confront the labor unions when there is trouble in labor land ( like overhauling the auto industry, in order to save it from Japanese domination)? Can Edwards fight hard to ensure his White house is not held hostage to the liberal dorks of the fringe Democratic party? Will John be able to hold up agianst the social enablers like Rev Al and Rev (huh,really) Jesse who want to continue the system that has enslaved minorities with programs that keep them in the clutches of a government welfare program; thus insuring thier own patheic survival. What does Edawrds bring to the table in internatiobal affairs? We have seen this President, w/ zero global skilss, bring in a vastly expierenced team that has has stuck in the mire of Iraq. I ask- is Edwards really what we need, now, to lead us? JFK had plenty of travel/research time oversaes plus time in both HofR and the Senate. He was raised on politics by Joe K and knew how to survive. I do not think Edwards is at that level yet, no matter where he preens and postures.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23575Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:06:26 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23575Kristin Rielly, Lawton, OklahomaAs many of you have said, yeah - he may be a rookie but an "experienced" G.W. Bush didn't get the job done so we need a "fresh face" so to speak who is still energized about devoting his term to making change for those who have been ignored by the Bush Administration. I too voted for Edwards in the primaries in 2004! I will do so again! And as for Elizabeth, she will make a fine first lady - I am not focusing on her appearance or any other candidates wive's appearance. It does not affect my vote. This is a woman who has survived Breast Cancer and gets my respect in sweatpants! Edwards for 2008! :) Tomorrow starts today! Ignore the hype Democrats with Clinton and Obama! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23578Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:14:14 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23578Bill Allen, Mount Juliet, TennesseeRemember America, we vote for our President, to run our country. We must pick the one canidate that is best suited to handle the business affairs of the largest corporation in the world. The most powerful CEO that can change the course of history simply by encouraging us,"we the people", to come together again, as we did right after 9/11, and once again gain the respect of all the peoples of the world. This translates to a Strong and Happy American Society, where we all profit in our personal lives. As it is now, we are divided as a people, and becoming what the ole saying decribes " A house divided cannot stand". Personally, I am a Christian American, who believes in our government to be run "By the People", and not selfish individuals who hide behind closed doors, and make decisions that protect their financial and personal life, while the great majority lingers in ignorance. Do we need a change?...you bet we do! Lets get off this road that is broad, and get back on the straight and narrow! Lets start by electing the only candiate that has not been immoralized by Special Intrest Groups, or Political machines. I am voting, once again, for John Edwards, as he is the only right choice.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23581Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:23:14 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23581Ray Witt Bluepoint,N.Y.As a conservative republican from N.Y.,My life is frustrating enough.Watching H.Clintons carefully scripted course of running in the{UNLOSEABLE}state of N.Y.as a springboard to the oval office,and the acceptance of her as a viable option is sickening,and talk about sickening,JOE BIDEN!There should be more than enough footage of his behaviors during several of the supreme court nominations to stifle this farce..If you Dems dont want to blow it this time..Obama/Edwards will be your best bet!!!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23584Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:27:55 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23584Bill, Charlotte, NCJohn Edwards without an ego? Please! This guy did nothing for NC when in office. He couldn't carry the state for Al Gore either. He continues to preach his "Two Americas" Message although he is fabulously wealthy. You should know that he is just another slimey trial attorney. His bid for POTUS shows his ongoing desire for notoriety. He won't get it done in '08. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23592Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:56:40 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23592C.Cook, West Branch, MIAhhh, although a registered Republican (moderate), I can finally truly vote for the best man. John Edwards. With Elizabeth as First Lady, he would be the best president we've seen in a very long time.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23605Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:36:49 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23605Svein Ryland, Newcastle WAI am just elated at Edwards stepping up to run at this time! He reaches all the people in this nation that has been "passed up" as the middle-class is dissapearing under the current lack of leadership. John Edwards has everything it takes for America to regain it's former respect world-wide and take care of business at home. I believe Hilary has plenty of experience but America is not ready for a female in the White-House. And Obama should be Edwards running-mate! A perfect combination !!http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23609Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:40:10 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23609David Partin, Mechanicsburg, PaJohn Edwards is the kind of man of intelligence and character that this country desperately needs. I supported him in 2004 and will again.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23610Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:44:07 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23610Garrett Peck, Aftlanta, GAThere's no doubt that of the currently declared Democratic candidates, Edwards is the best choice. Certainly Hillary Clinton and Obama are likely to get in the race officially before long, but Hillary's high negatives and Obama's lean experience make them questionable candidates. Biden's a good man, but is too representative of "old school" political thinking to excite. Dennis Kucinich is the "loony left" candiate and is not viable. Unless Wesley Clark does us all a favor and runs again, Edwards will be my choice. Clark/Edwards is the only ticket I see being able to beat anyone the Republicans are lible to put up.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23611Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:47:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23611Cherie Tiffany, DeSoto, IAIowa knows a good thing when they see it. Follow the lead of approx. 2,500 people who poured into the Iowa Historical Bldg last night to show support for the Iowa front-runner in his first town-hall meeting. Our own former Governor, Tom Vilsack, had about 150 at his "formal annoucement". John Edwards has it all...electability, message, heart, and brains. Wouldn't it be a nice change to have a commander in chief who has those qualities? Edwards does!!! http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23613Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:01:37 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23613B. Suite, Springfield, OHIt's time for change. It is time for a citizen to be in charge not a person who has special interests (oil, haliburton) and act like they don't. It's time for someone who is going to help us get where we want to be. We are the best country in the world and we need to lead like we are, not push everybody around like we are. Leaders are followed, if we are "dogs" we will get our day. It's time for sweeping change, and Edwards is that change. The other two will never win, one reason, one is a woman and one is not white. I am not being sexist or racist, but to win you have to capture the majority of votes. Are democrats, when the HAVE to win, going to risk putting a first woman or first black president in office. Clinton and Obama need to run in 8 years when the democrats have made significant change to this country.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23614Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:03:32 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23614Suzanne H., Los Angeles, CAHad an opportunity to hear Edwards in Pasadena, CA last month. In a packed room with an additional 2 overflow rooms, he appeared genuine, engaged and comfortable. What stands out in my mind is his statement, "We need something in this country to be patriotic about besides war." http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#23615Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:07:22 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23615Jerry StasyszenThe DNC had already made the decision to select Kerry as their prominent hopeful in 04. He was a bonafide war hero and had money to burn, unfortunately, it backfired because he did not have the courage to stand up against the GOP's spin machine. Edwards has the intellect, experience and desire to win. He is launching his campaign early to get a good foothold, a wise move indeed. He has already apologized and rescinded his vote to support the war. The GOP will not have much to attack him on other than his lack of foreign policy experience but he can counter with "I am not George W Bush, I won't ignore foreign policy experts and I won't load my cabinet with cronies, my cabinet will have experienced professionals to lead." I believe he can win and at this point he has my vote.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#25027Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:01:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25027Tom Daly, Everett, MAJohn Edwards is the guy without all the skeletons in his closet for Republicans to exploit. He doesn't piss people off, doesn't make enemies, and is an all-around personable man. Electing Edwards as President would force a 180 degree change in U.S. politics. As for Foreign Policy, I'd rather have an amenable President who's willing to negotiate and discuss issues with foreign powers, and John Edwards' personality tells me he would do just that. We really need someone in the White House who can repair U.S. relations with the rest of the world.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#25067Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:35:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25067Shadow, Mansfield, CTThe fact that Obama and Edwards are beating McCain and Guiliani in head-to-heads in both Iowa and New Hampshire completely undermines this "unelectability" garbage. As one poster here noted, no major Democratic candidate is unelectable after two of the closest Presidential elections in history; however, just because somebody "can" win, that certainly doesn't mean they probably will. And thus there are some Democrats that would be stupid to run, because although they COULD win, they probably won't: Gore, Kerry, and Hillary Clinton come to mind, and in that order. Those people would all be selfish to ask the country to take a bad bet on what will be the only alternative to a Bush successor. I mean yeah, IF things continue to tank for the Republicans, and IF the party continues to disintegrate, then they'd have a much better than 1:1 shot. But do Democrats want to bet YET ANOTHER presidential election on big ifs, with a safety net of weak personality? Obama and Edwards are charismatic, positive, and populist, can do well with independents, and have major potential in the Midwest, which will likely decide the next election; those are the two men between whom the Democratic primary should come down to if electability is really being taken seriously as an issue. Although I do believe people like Clark, Dodd, Richardson, and Kucinich will add a lot to the debate, none of them have positioned themselves credibility as someone who would have a better than 50% shot at beating McCain across the country. Only Obama and Edwards have made this case successfully so far with their surprisingly strong head to head numbers in Iowa and New Hampshire. Personally, I think Obama is the best major presidential candidate of either party to run in my lifetime (for more reasons than I could even list here), but I also think Edwards would be a very good choice, and certainly either would be light years better than any Republican administration trying to position itself as an heir apparent to the worst Presidency in history. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#25461Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:23:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25461Dep Kirkland, Los Angeles, CAI know this is about Edwards, but... another word or two about Wes Clark. The Iraq occupation has become a tempting but dangerous talking point for supporters of former Gen. Clark for the Presidency. All that is said about him in regard to his military service is true, undoubtedly, but by continuously focusing on it, his supporters present a one-dimensional face of a man who may be one of the most multi-talented and multi-dimensional men to ever seek the nation’s highest office. Yes, Wes Clark was Supreme NATO Commander and, as such, directed the armies of several nations to stop the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, for which all nations were grateful and for which he deserves the honors he received. But, there’s more: Clark finished first in his class at West Point, one of the most demanding academic institutions in America. He was a Rhodes Scholar who holds a Masters degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Oxford University. He was a distinguished White House Fellow and is a recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom (along with the Congressional Gold Medal of Honor, the nation’s highest civilian award). He holds honorary knighthoods from both the British and Dutch governments and was awarded the title of Commander of the Legion of Honor by the government of France. He holds the Bronze Star, Silver Star, Purple Heart and Legion of Merit (4 times), along with over a dozen other decorations for his military service, including the Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantry Badge, Parachutist (Airborne) Badge and Army Ranger Tab. Most recently, add investment banker, author and commentator to the list. Too often we tend to raise up ourselves or those for whom we politic at the expense of others. There is no need to do that in Clark's case. He is quite simply an exemplary person and his record of real achievement over three plus decades, not just smiles and handshakes, speaks so loudly that little else need be said. His backers would do well to open the book and read from all the chapters. Being a four-star general is no small thing, especially in these times. But, he’s far more than that. Our nation would be fortunate to have someone of his caliber at its helm. General Alexander M. Haig, Jr. once said of Clark, “Wes Clark has the character and depth to be another Marshall or Eisenhower in time of war.” A high compliment, indeed. Like Eisenhower, there might be other uses for such a person after they shed the uniform.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#25563Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:00:45 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25563Rod Doe, Seattle, WABush, Rove, et. al. sought 50.5% on the right side of the electorate, got it, and acted like it had a mandate. Wouldn't it be great if the next president got the center 70% of the vote? Edwards might be able to do that, but what he has in charisma, he lacks in gravitas. I think a ticket of Biden/Obama brings charisma, gravitas, and the widespread appeal that could actually capture the center 60-70% of the electorate.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#25777Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:03:51 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25777Matt Kelso Albuquerque, NMSenators are not really very electable as Presidents. Why? Too much exposure on the national scene? I don't know, but the fact is that they haven't won in quite a while. Governors from the South and West do well, and by west I mean CA. Maybe NM this time, who knows. I think that not being a household name helps Richardson rather than hurts him, since voters either want the guy they've got or a new face altogether. Kerry and Gore can forget it, although they would both be good presidents. Clinton? Again, I think she'd be outstanding. I would vote for her in the general election, but if I would not vote for her in the primary. Up to 28 years of nothing but Bushes and Clintons? We need some more diversity. But Obama has this quality of direct speech that is well thought out that is unheard of in American politics. It is the craziest thing, somebody asks him a question, and he answers it. Sort of the antithesis of Secretary Rice. So I guess what I'm saying is: Obama-Richardson '08.http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#25953Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:55:00 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25953Darren W, Vista CAEdwards?! Hah! Americans don't vote for the most competent, intelligent person (Wes Clark...cough couch). They vote for someone they trust. ...Someone with whom they identify--a beer drinking, brush-clearing, man's man--and I'm not sure how Edwards is going to compete with Hilary on this one. The only thing that will trump colleagiality is charisma. Edwards isn't totally lacking here, but he doesn't have it brimming at the seams like.... you guessed it. Barack Obama. All Barack has to do is tie a string around John Kerry and tie the other end to Edwards. Kerry will drag Edwards down to Munsterdom unless John Kerry miraculously grows a personality like Al Gore. Despite Obama's lack of experience, he's got youth and charisma. He can make you BELIEVE again. That's what is going to win the presidency in a time when America needs hope. He'll have ample opportunity to pick a running mate who compensates for his shortcomings, but it won't be Edwards. http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#26128Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:58:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:26128Michael Hart, Auckland, New ZealandAs a foreigner who admired Kennedy, Ford and Clinton as American presidents I am really saddened to see what Bush and Cheney have done not only to stuff up the US but destroy the opportunities for peace paricularly in the Middle East. We all know the last two Presidential races were close but unless Ameriacns really care about their country and get out and vote the US and the world will end up with another dumb puppet controlled by a dangerous cabal persuing their own selfish interests. The United Sates has done so much for the world and we in New Zealand were grateful for the US troops stationed here in WW2 but in the last 6 years it has allowed its President and government to destroy much of the goodwill it has built up over centuries. From what I have seen of John Edwards so far, he would make an outstanding President and give the US a makeover it so desperately needs. If I had a vote in the US I would definitely vote for himhttp://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23108.aspx#26205Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:40:15 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:26205Travis Todd, Ashland, KYI think that Edwards would make a great president. I love what he said on the Hardball College Tour when he talked about how the people who are running for president this time around should be thinking about what kind of president they want to be. And he's right. This country needs someone with vision, and I think Edwards has it. I think Obama is in the same position that Edwards was in the last election. He's a great speaker and has a lot of charisma. However, it's his inexperience not his race that will make voters pass on Obama as a the democratic nominee. I like Biden and the way he communicates. No B.S.! I just don't think that he will be able to raise enough money or gain enough support past Deleware. As far as Hillary goes? I don't know. I just cannot, cannot, cannot see her winning a general election. Yeah, some people may be hung up about her being a female. I think more than that though, it's about her being her. Hillary has raised more money than anyone else (true). But I just don't see how she's going to be able to transform those dollars into the votes that she'll need to win the White House. Hillary is a polarizing figure. And because she is, I doubt that she will be able to change enough minds between now and the 08' election.