<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>McCain on Giuliani papers, Iraq</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/04/26496.aspx</link><description>Transcript from Brian Williams' interview with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)
WILLIAMS:&amp;nbsp; We are happy to welcome Arizona Republican Senator John McCain to our coverage. 
Senator, you’re in the news this week for another matter, off the subject of Iraq,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>McCain on Giuliani papers, Iraq</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/04/26496.aspx#26567</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:26:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:26567</guid><dc:creator>David Turner, Mount Gretna  PA</dc:creator><description>I am somewhat astonished that anyone would be upset because Mr. Keith Ellison, the first muslim to be elected to Congress, would want to take his oath and obligation on the Quran rather than a bible.

I think it much more important that he use the book that is most meaningful to him; otherwise it would not be a sincere obligation.  I much rather have him swear to uphold the constitution of the United States on a book that he honestly adhears to rather than one he doesn't.  Think about it; would it mean much if a christian took an obligation on the Quran?</description></item><item><title>McCain on Giuliani papers, Iraq</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/04/26496.aspx#26646</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:47:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:26646</guid><dc:creator>Sam Mann Bloomfield NJ</dc:creator><description>McCain will destroy himself with his anger and his thirst for power. Here is a guy who might have made a great President a few years ago, when he was a so-called 'Maverick' to some. But since he campaigned for and closed ranks with GWBush, most earnestly in 2004, he has deflated into a lap dog of the Right. He is hedging on many positions, and to me he just does not have the onions he once had. Guiliani has always been an egomaniac and cannot govern with any serious notion of mission. He acts for himself, professionally and personally, as his record bears out. As DA in New York in the 1980's I can recall his tone deafness, racial antipathy, and 'my way or the hiway' attitude. His support of the Rockafeller Drug Laws also puts him in a bad light. I am all for Republicans who favor choice, gay rights, and quality of life issues - wish more Repub's were like that, but this guy is not presidential timber. But in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king, so if we gotta have a Republican president, I would rather have Rudy than Newt, or Jeb, or Trent, or Mitt. At least he has a normal first name! Oh one more thing - why all the great kudos for his handling of 911...he didnt do anything but walk thru the dust and point his finger. I'd like to read something substantive on his deeds of those weeks and why he stands out in some people's minds for that.</description></item><item><title>McCain on Giuliani papers, Iraq</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/04/26496.aspx#26663</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:21:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:26663</guid><dc:creator>Michael Brintz, Palmdale, California</dc:creator><description>I turn 18 in June and the first election I have a chance to vote in is the 2008 presidential election. Ever since  the last time the presidency was up for grabs I decided on who I would vote for: Sen. John McCain. Admittedly my vote means little, since I live in California, which will most certainly go to the Democrats. However, I will vote on principle because whatever names people may call him, at the end of the day John McCain will still have his integrity intact which (despite accusations otherwise) he has not let slip for the sake of his obvious ambitions. He has proved this by taking a heavily unpopular stance (the troop "surge" in Iraq) reaffirming that he is, at heart, a true public servant. Neither Hillary Clinton, Guiliani, Gingrich, Romney or Obama can say that with a clear conscience. God bless John McCain and vote for him in '08!!!</description></item><item><title>McCain on Giuliani papers, Iraq</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/04/26496.aspx#461031</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:02:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:461031</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>It can sometimes become formidable to separate the acceptable dog harness info from the inadequate.</description></item></channel></rss>