Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Jack Roberts, Eugene, OR — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:12:06 GMT

So where is the list of Hillary Clinton's legislative accomplishments after 7 years in the Senate?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

James Cookfair — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:21:01 GMT

Chris,
Senator Obama has been in the US Senate for 1.5 years, Senator Clinton for 7.5 years. I continually hear about the experience she has - can you ask a Clinton supporter what she's pushed through the Senate during that time period - i can't recall anything. Play hardball on both sides....

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

David Magyar — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:22:50 GMT

Here's a suggestion for Chris Matthews. Do some research and report on all the legislation Obama has sponsored that has become law. Then compare that with Clinton's legislative accomplishments. If you care about these candidates' records then show your viewers what these records are.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

J. Andres — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:31:45 GMT

Chris,
Hardball! You threw 3 97 mph fastballs past this guy. He never got the bat off his shoulder, walked back to the dugout and said what the hell was that!
Now how about asking the Clinton people what makes her "ready on day one". What has she done in 12 years to change any policy, inspire any action. It's hardball, but lets play fair!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

ed kann Illinois — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:37:06 GMT

Ok Chris .. you gave Claire McCaskill an opportunity and 60 seconds to tell you of all Obama's accomplishments.. It was so easy to see that comming.. I am tired of all the holyer than thou Obamabots and the surrogates trying to plant the seed that the election is over.. The only thing that counts is the delegates and there just isnt a world of difference at this point.. Furthermore neither one will have enough to have the winninng amount.. And mr. Obama and his minions dont seem to like that , hence the push and shot across the the bow of the DNC threatening mutiny.. It is simple if no one hits the number then the delegates decide.. Thats called politics and obama knows it.. He puts it in the mouths of his babes and tries to keept his hands clean.. He is a good politician.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Jim, Davenport — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:43:43 GMT

Mr. Matthews won stump the chump last night. I know Mr. Matthews already knew the guy didn't have a clue. Let me tell you what would of been my response. I don't care, I know the things he has worked on. What is more important to me is he is not part of the Washington establishment. More and more bills he sponsors corners him into he What he can't and can stand for. It is just the way it works. If he had three terms in the senate he would lose that my support and my vote.

Has anyone ever wonder that in this great country we always have to think just a experienced polictician can become President. Obama is the closest we can get.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Timothy Kincaid, Carmel, IN — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:49:57 GMT

Well..one could only wander how the young lady would have responded to such rudeness by Chris. It's obvious that you're a Clinton supporter (I support neither candidate). The list of legislative accomplishments has been extensively published across the internet...and in Congress. It would have been much more fitting for you to ask about Hillary's accomplishments, since it is theoretically zero...unless you want to name a few post offices.

Also I would love to point to the fact that Mr. Obama has as much, if not more "experience" then Ms. Clinton. Just because my wife is married to a dentist, doesn't make her a dentist. Her 1 piece of legislature that she attempted to get off the ground during HER 1st term, was sadly rejected. Being a stay at home mother in the white house, and she still couldn't accomplish anything.

Sad sad sad, I guess the media is about as redneck as we would claim America to be...just want another white person...any white person, in the White House.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

John J. Wollan — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:50:39 GMT

Chris Matthews,

I watch your show and Countdown almost every night and find them very informative. However, although your question to Sen. Kirk Watson was totally appropriate, I think you pushed it too hard by repeating it. But much more importantly I believe you, and essentially all the other press, do not force Hillary and/or her supporters to specifically identify her "experience and accomplishments". For example, you let the woman representative from Ohio supporting Hillary say things like "the great things Hillary has done for health care for children" and other similar comments, but you DID NOT ask the representatve essentially the same question you asked Sen. Watson, to identify SPECIFICALLY what those supposed acchivements were. Hillary may very well have them, but the point is you should have asked the representative! To repeat myself, the press, as well as the Clinton campaign, have done little or nothing to clearly delinate her experience and accomplishments.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Samuel Winslow, Piscataway, NJ — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:50:53 GMT

Last night on the alleged "Hardball" show we saw one of the most biased interviews by a host that I have witnessed during this political campaign. Chris Matthews seems to be so happy that he caught an Obama supporter off guard by asking him to name Obama's legislative accomplishments, but it is a shame to see someone like Matthews who probably calls himself a journalist behave in such a biased manner.

A real game of hardball gives both sides a chance to bat. And an objective journalist would have simply asked the Clinton supporter on the show last night to answer the SAME question: "Ms. Clinton Supporter, can you name just one of Hillary Clinton's legislative accomplishments?" My guess is you would have heard the same silence from the Clinton supporter that you heard from the Obama supporter because the biggest farce in this campaign is that Hillary Clinton is believed to be so "experienced".

An even bigger farce is the notion that Clinton is a health care specialist. Doesn't anyone other than me remember the last time Hillary Clinton tried to come up with a health care plan for the country? She was just the co-president back then. Given her past failures which include supporting the disastrous NAFTA bill and voting to give President Bush the power to get us into the Iraq morass, should we turn the country over to Hillary? I sure HOPE not!

Play some fair hardball in the future, Chris Matthews! I have liked your show before last night. But if you can't be fair and balanced go work at Fox where biased interviews are the norm, not the exception.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Darryl, Washington DC — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:53:22 GMT

Chris,

I watch your show often, primarily because you for the most part hold both side to the same heat of hardball. I must say that the topic of Michelle Obama shocks me. Why would you ask what she meant when it is perfectly clear if you continue the her phrase ...BECAUSE... Lets get back to giving them both the hardball rather than promoting ratings. Now if it keeps you on TV I could deal with it a little longer as long as you sincerely corrected the record after all the fun.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Mike, Ukiah, California — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:53:47 GMT

I find it quite interesting that in these days, in this time, everybody proclaims that we have seen huge voter turnouts...it's true. But are we Americans so stupid that we can't choose the best candidate? If Hillary Clinton's "Legislative Accomplishments" are so much greater than Obamas, does that really matter to the voting public? Clearly, as the polls would indicate, it doesn't. So, perhaps, after reading this message, Chris Mathews can insult the American people for being stupid enough to vote for Obama over Clinton...clearly, he doesn't have the "Legislative Accomplishments" under his belt and the voters have spoken emphatically in the numbers...and the words are "Who cares!"

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

terry — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:55:31 GMT

I understand Chris playing hardball when he's on hardball!! Maybe Chris has cracked under pressure from the unkind comments he made about Hillary before, so now he goes after Obama! Chris you never asked the other person to tell us what Hillary has accomplished and then you could not answer Keith's question about what has congress done! You are beginning to look like an Obama hater, not a free news person!!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Joe M., Bloomfield, NJ — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:58:02 GMT

Chris,

I have been watching your show lately because of the enthusiasm and zeal you bring to your coverage of this election season. It did bother me however, to turn on the TV tonight to see see you misquote Michele Obama to her disadvantage, you had her saying and you repeated it at least 3 times -- "for the first time in my adult lifetime i am proud of my country," WHEN WHAT SHE ACTUALLY SAID WAS "for the first time ... i am really proud of my country." Really is a key word here. She could have been proud many times, but now the pride has surged to a more intense degree, and so she uses the adjective "really." I like you and your show, but I would like it even more if you didn't misquote or distort quotes or facts just to make a better story. This viewer for one, does not appreciate it.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

JJ — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:00:55 GMT

Chris,
If you say Michelle Obama's speech in Madison, WI on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at about 3:13pm, you would hear Mrs. Obama say(if it hasn't been changed but you can read her lips) she says "really proud". This would also be important to hear and see when attacking her for the speech in Milwaukee.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Lydia F — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:01:44 GMT

I am glad you brought Senator McCaskill to set the record straight today. I was not sure if the intent behind that line of questioning was to demonstrate that Obama had no record or to demonstrate that his supporters do not know the details of his record.

On your (or Scarborough's) comment this morning about having to choose between a year out of school Dr. or the experienced Dr., I would choose the straight out of school Dr. if he demonstrated real talent in during practical training as opposed to the experienced Dr. who made mistakes when tough decisions were called for in their career.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Kristin Kanipe, Corvallis, OR — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:02:40 GMT

A Hardball fan, I found Matthews' attack of Sen. Watson last night offensive. As Keith pointed out on air, the program was NOT Hardball and Matthews came across as mean spirited and nasty. He behaved like a school yard bully. A real turnoff! It has made me rethink my viewing habits.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Jeffrey Gruber, Fayetteville, NC — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:09:46 GMT

Chris Matthews conduct in this interview was reprehensible. As a member of the military to see the conduct,aggression, and complete lack of respect by Mr. Matthews in "interviewing" a U.S. Senator, makes me question at times why I and others fight for freedom of speech. If he was a prosecuting attorney trying to get a conviction against a violent criminal, then it would have been acceptable; but as we all know it was an elected official who serves our nation. Mr. Matthews tactic in questioning the Senator were abhorent and bring great shame on himself and more specifically on NBC for not taking any action. My action will be to boycott NBC and it's affiliates for the forseeable future.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Vox Populi — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:10:40 GMT

It was a classic case of Chris Matthews bullying an unsophisticated state Senator to show how tough he is, a cowardly tactic he usually reserves for women. Sucker punching someone invited on his show and then trying to make it an issue the next day. Not great journalism.

As Chris likes to quote movies, the journalistic style here more resembles the Robert Duvall character in "The Natural" who sums up his twisted motives by admitting he never played the game, but justifies his despicable actions as "making the game more interesting by breaking the likes (of his subjects of attack)."

Obama is not running on his long list of legislative accomplishments -- any more than Carter was and you know it. I am not sure what motivated the episode, turned off by the sloppy southerners looks or feelings that you are somehow superior to an inferior, but all that was reflected was a lack of class on your side. At the very least put a warning label on your invitation next time

Wake up, Chris, it is not tough nor good journalism. Just Cheap shots. You are better than that, or can be, we have seen it.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Louis, Phoenix, Az. — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:22:51 GMT

why no clip of Chris using Osama Bin Laden to represent Obama for a 'story' he presented? Chris seems quick to jump on others missteps and mistakes but 0 coverage on his. Plus no one allowed to comment on it.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Carly, Milwaukee, WI — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:24:38 GMT

I believe the Senator from Texas just got caught off guard. It's like he walked into a burger joint & the waiter said may I offer you some frog legs & caviar...just plain old confusion...He thought he coming on to say some nice words about Barack's win in WI & the possibility in TX on a campaign wrap-up show...Instead he walked into the 'Congressional Hearing' that IS Chris Matthews....That was a bait & switch...Hardball comes on 7pm(est)& it has it's own theme music and everything Chris....But I think that's the funniest thing I've seen on your show since I started watching...I support Obama & could go through a laundry list of his accomplishments...however I have had a brain freeze or two in my lifetime as well...Give the guy a break :-)

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Toby Wahl, Tyler, Texas — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:34:42 GMT

Matthews forgot he wasn't on Hardball. I think it was clear that Sen. Watson was ambushed. He was on to answer questions about Obama's big win that had just occurred moments before. Watson didn't go on to examined why he personally supported Obama. Matthews antics of late are getting wierd. He keeps quoting Michelle Obama wrong. She said "For the first time in my adult life, I am REALLY proud of my country." Matthews keeps leaving the "really" part out of it because it puts it more in context and context is evil in the world of talking heads. Matthews also showed a picture of Osama bin Laden the other day when he was referring to Obama. I am a fan, but you know, I can't really tell you a lot about Obama's Senate accomplishments either, but not knowing his Senate accomplishments is far better than knowing of bad legislation like the Iraq war resolution. I am a veteran and a teacher, and I have been proud of, and under Bush, embarrassed by this country. Regardless if some may think me unpatriotic, for the first time in my adult life I am REALLY proud of this country. A REALLY proud white man in Texas that was raised by people that thought the N word was good for negating people and punchlines. I am really proud of my country. Matthews, Take a lesson from Russert, be a pro all of the time.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Brian Reed — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:37:20 GMT

MSNBC is obviously not interested in any real debate on the truth here..I posted several facts to show the record of Both obama and Clinton. However you do not seem to want to show another side to the story.... gosh I thought one sided reporting was the exclusive job of Fox.. guess not

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Angela Gleason, Dubuque, IA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:39:01 GMT

Lay off the poor guy. In this same broadcast I heard Tim Russert mention the three most contentious Democrat conventions in history: 1963, 1976, and 1980. He must have read the teleprompter wrong, mistaking 1968 for 1963. Or else there was a typo. No matter what, Tim should have known better because I did. So lay off the poor guy from Texas. He doesn't get paid the big bucks.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

NL Hutchinson — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:47:44 GMT

As short as your show was tonight, I was privilaged to watch your questioning of Sen. Watson. The look on his face was priceless, but it reminded me of another interview. Who was that, now, hmm. Oh, I remember; it was you on the Daily Show promoting your book. And Jon was hardballing you about the content of the book and you had that same look. In fact, I was surprised at the pain in your voice when you said, something like this: "Geez, Jon, I thought you were my friend."
I really do like your show, but sometimes you go over the top. Were you bribed by the Clinton campaign so that they would allow MSNBC to hold future debates? Just a question.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Amiebrooke Miller, West Des Moines Iowa — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:03:12 GMT

Dear Mr. Matthews,
I was once an exclusive CNN fan, but have since enjoyed following the election coverage on your network and have gained a great deal of respect for you and your colleagues.

I was, however, disappointed in your banter with Texas Senator Kirk Watson. I agree, as does he, that he could not summon the information that many of us (die hards) know by heart.
What I was wondering is why you refrained from asking Clinton supporter Rep. Tubbs Jones the same question.

I was especially intrigued that you didn't "grill" Rep. Tubbs Jones on her claim of Senator Clinton's "Legislative accomplishments ALL ACROSS THE WORLD." Attacking that groundless statement seemed right up your alley.
I'm almost your biggest fan!
Much love!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

integrity matters Illinois — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:07:33 GMT

Outstanding Job by Chris Mathews.
Finally, a journalist who asks relevant questions.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Doug Ganley — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:26:04 GMT

I'm a huge fan of Hardball and of Chris Mathews, however, while the question was certainly correct to ask and demand and an answer from the Texas senator, the stridency by which Chris asked was a little off-putting. It was clear that the Senator was unprepared. Chris could have made his point without embarassing him. It was kind of like running up the points at a football game against a clearly inferior team.You win but wind up looking like a jerk.Uncharestically bad form on Chris' part

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Ann Bunts Ruckersville,Va — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:36:54 GMT

Chris you were so rude to State Senator, Kirk Watson, on Tuesday night. You stated tonight on your program that people who were on Hardball knew you were tough. May I remind you that you were not on Hardball when you went after Mr. Watson.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Pamela Faulconer — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:41:40 GMT

I love MSNBC but was VERY uncomfortable while watchig the election returns Tuesday night with Chris Matthews and his interview of Sen. Watson. Since Sen. Watson was obviously as a loss for words, why not just move on with the interview? I know that the show is called "Hardball", but did you just have to keep hitting him in the head with the ball? I am not familiar with Sen. Watson, but I have been in the hotseat before and I really felt for him. Perhaps you thought that he should be more informed about his candidate (whom I plan to vote for) but, please. Perhaps the American public has stooped to the level of enjoying seeing people humiliated on the air, although but I would hope that the mentality of the general public watching your program is mentally above that.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Ann Bunts Ruckersville,Va — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:44:54 GMT

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Gary Gonzales, Lynden, Wa. — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:45:37 GMT

I believe the question you asked the govenor of Wisconsin and the congressman from Texas was a fair question (Name one thing Senator Obama has accomplished during his time in the Senate). My question is if you are really interested in Senator Obama's accomplishments why would you not ask someone who knows? Why would you get so much pleasure out of embarrassing these two men? In my opinion the only thing you accomplished was making yourself look small. Sorry to say you've lost this fan.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

G. Stames San Diego CA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:57:06 GMT

I have been a faithful viewer of Hardball, but always with some reservations. Yesterday's sucker punch by Chris Matthew's was a self-promoting, ego driven low blow. He wasn't even appearing on "Suckerball". He was appearing as part of MSNBC coverage as Kieth pointed out. Some people don't know when they are being a jerk. Some people can't resist the opportunity to be one.Does it really matter if the guy can't recite Obama's legislative record? You can see Matthews slobbering all himself trying to set him up to get the question in.This was about promoting his show not about coverage. Count me among your former viewers.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

A.W. Langston — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:57:43 GMT

Last night on MSNBC, Chris Matthews asked a Texas senator (who is an Obama supporter) if he could name one or any accomplishment(s) Obama has as a senator, and the Texas politician could not even come up with an answer. He had no idea, no real knowledge regarding Barack Obama's senate record. I'll bet you could ask any of his supporter's the same question and you would net the same pathetic response. It was truly a brave question by Chris Matthews and an embarrassing response by this senator. It's very sad to see people in America (even elected officials) basing their vote on fancy oratory, and not on the real issues and substance these candidates bring to the table. Kudos to Chris Matthews for telling it like it is. I'm sure the Texas senator had time to go back to his office and Google Obama's senate record which according to www.GovTrack.us is as follows:
Statistic: Barack Obama missed 185 of 1098 votes (17%) since Jan 6, 2005 (Extremely Poor relative to peers).
How convenient for Sen. Watson to leave this out of his website response.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

John Schurman, Huntington, West Virginia — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:09:54 GMT

The fact that Senator Obama has a thin resume doesn’t bother me. Abraham Lincoln was only a one-term congressman in the 1840s and he turned out pretty good. If you value experience in Washington more than anything else, why not elect Senator Byrd as President?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

BThomas Bell — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:14:07 GMT

Why do Americans want 'change' so much?

We are sick and tired of this fascist right wing ,question and SPIN exchange,

Why the loaded questions? Why the spin? Why is this a 'Bad' thing.

It is time to move on , past the Bush/Cheney Liar politics.

I like you Chris, get with it, Americans are tired of the BS, we are sick of the BS, enough already.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Margie Walker, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:27:49 GMT

Thank you for one of my favorite moments from the 2008 campaign. I have asked this question of Obama supporters and 95% of the time, I received the same blank look that you got. My 12 year old son and 10 year old twin girls know more about the backgrounds and accomplishments of Clinton and Obama than most adults.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

DLC, Rhode Island — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:32:03 GMT

Here are some of Sen. Obama's accomplishments...

During the first 8 years of his elected service, Obama sponsored over 820 bills. He introduced

233 regarding health-care reform,
125 on poverty and public assistance,
112 crime fighting bills,
97 economic bills,
60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills,
21 ethics reform bills,
15 gun control,
6 veterans affairs

His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills and co-sponsored another 427. These included the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, the Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act…

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Rich M — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:36:32 GMT

Mr. Matthews, I listen to you regularly. But come on, that's not the right way to get answers. He should have responded like all politicians. "It's not my job to read you his resume, I'll leave that for him. I'm supporting him because he is dynamic and she's not. He displays himself as approachable and she's not. And he comes across and believeable and she does not.
Easy response.
Also, just a side note (different subject). If you're going to keep talking about this issue with Michelle Obama ask the question and do the research, what do the people that don't like what she said look like. Blacks have been accused for centuries that they were unpatriotic. That's a euphemism for reverse racism. I immediately perk up when I hear someone tell me they're a patriot. That's a code word for one thing only.............

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Greta Oster, Irvine, CA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:42:16 GMT

Glad to hear at least a few factual comments on the Senator Obama's shortages.
Watching the “Nation of Sheep” following Obama’s “Yes, we can” slogan, I wonder
what resources the apparent Messiah will use, as the president, to fulfill the loudly chanted desires.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Joseph Tages — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:44:43 GMT

Chris, I read Senator Watson's response to the incident. Granted, he was there to defend his candidate and failed to do so, but we all suffer what is commonly referred to as a "brain lapse" every now and then. Barack Obama's popularity is nearing rock star status, as you showed yourself by counting the number of times people have fainted during his speeches a couple of days back.

Obama is a different sort of candidate for a lot of Americans, and not just because of his race. True, he's also a blank slate due to his brief tenure as Senator. This is why the main criticism directed at him is "lack of experience." But the fact that people want a clear change from the present administration and its policies is helping Obama as much as his personality, and this is overshadowing his lack of Senatorial accomplishments.

It's still a long way until election day. As the furor over whether Obama wins the nomination (or not) dies down, you'll be seeing more folks backing him up, all better prepared for your questions than Watson was last night.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Cindy Hadden Centralia WA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:01:46 GMT

This Senator Watson is exactly what is wrong with the country. A preacher of hope comes along, the youth get more involved, as do ADULTS - who scream for justice, but have done nothing to become informed on parties, policies, successes. Then they walk away, forgeting to be patriots and part of their own government through the same laziness.
This takes the cake however, my God, the man is a state senator! Shameful - all of it.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Cynthia Hadden Centralia WA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:09:31 GMT

What a friggin' weak next day excuse Senator. No one believes it. Shameful!
You should leave the political arena. I just feel so ashamed that too many Americans like you (a lawmaker for cryin' out loud) and the young just are too lazy to work at our patriot duties, be examples of that rather than whiners.
This behavior is what is killing our country.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Steve Gilkey ,St. Charles,MO — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:13:20 GMT

Senator Watson sounds like Senator Obama. He talks but does not tell us anything. What does Senator Obama plan to do as President and How will he accomplish it?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

K Isaacs, Northern Viginia — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:29:10 GMT

That would have been real hardball if only the same challenge had been posed to the Clinton supporter as well. I have challenged several Clinton supporters the same way and not one came up with a single valid achievement for her. The only one that was close is that she was elected as a New York Senator without even living in that state-if that is one?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Chris, AR — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:41:12 GMT

Of course he has his talking points now. The Obama camaign faxed, emailed, and IM'd him the whole list of votes in for he was "present".

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

roger thomas — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:46:35 GMT

Does it bother anyone that the media and Democrats are being duped by the GOP to get Obama on the ticket?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Tim Meinrath — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:16:06 GMT

Watson was like a deer caught in Mathews headlights.

I think CM was a bit of a bully putting Watson on the spot like that.

I've lost my interest in Hard Line after that "it's all about me, Chris Mathews" moment.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Patrick, San Francisco, CA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:48:17 GMT

Great job, Chris. This is what we expect of political journalists; tough questions and demanding an answer rather than allowing the spin machines of all political figures to control the debate.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Gerry Mathis Tucson, Ariz. — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:02:51 GMT

Dear Chris---

Thank you so much for asking about Obama's accomplishments after Hillary has just about lost her bid for President. I have noticed before that you do not care for Hillsry. Just an observation. At this point I will not vote for either canidate. We had one President that did not know what he was doing, we do not NEED another.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Scott Taylor, Garner, NC — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:12:57 GMT

What a Bush League move! Chis Matthews who can get just about any Obama supporter he wants decides to side swipe this guy on national TV! This morning I turned on Morning Joe to see Chris Mattews smug face as if he just took down someone really important. Now that you have ambushed him, I bet that you wouldn't have the conviction to have this guy back on!

This makes me continue to wonder why MSNBC keep this clown around.

For the record, I have been an Edwards supporter and I have not made my mind up yet as to who I will vote for in my primary in May.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Karen Sked. Mt. Baldy, CA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:17:42 GMT

I'm a fan of Hardball, but MSNBC should consider replacing Chris Matthews as an election night pundit.
He comes across as a cranky old man who's up past his bedtime. He apparently calculated that Mr.Watson was a little slow to respond and in a pre-calculated move, launched this attack. My goodness, Mr. Watson didn't even get the word 'we' out of his mouth before Matthews jumped down his throat. Very tacky.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Terry Craig, Seattle, Wash — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:28:48 GMT

I'm glad Chris hard balled this Obama supporter! I love Obama, but his supporters who chose to come on national television, should have known this critism was out there and should have been prepared. I don't think they will make that mistake again!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Jeff, Madison, Wisconsin — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:54:08 GMT

Chris,

I watch your show religiously. I sincerely believe that Tim Russert and yourself are the last bastion of good, objective reporters out there. Being in my 20s I know what my grandparents felt listening or watching Edward R. Murrow or Walter Cronkite through your reporting. On the issue of Mr. Watson, I truly felt sorry for this Texas State Senator but understand your argument completely. If you say you support a specific candidate be prepared to defend him or her. I think what the root of this issue gets to is the experience argument. To refute this argument and claim that Obama is too inexperienced for the presidency it is important to point out that there was a man from Illinois who served 4 terms (8 years) in the Illinois State House and only 1 term (2 years) in the U.S. House before becoming the President who saved this country at a time when it was divided half slave and half free. I believe Lincoln would endorse Sen. Obama. Like Lincoln, Obama has 10 years of legislative experience(7 in the State Senate and 3 in the U.S. Senate). Also, let me add this is more elected, legislative experience than Mrs. Clinton. Like Lincoln, Obama is campaigning in a time when our country is governed by 51% and growing more divided daily and he offers a message of hope and unity. I hope you see what I'm getting at Chris. Have a great day. Happy Lent!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

ray ray, Los Angels California — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:27:07 GMT

While I'm an avid viewer of Hardball and will continue to be, I thought the grilling of Watson was onesided. You should have asked the congresswoman Jones the same question about Hillary. Don't you think? Moreover, simply because one cannot list a candidate's legislative accomplishments off the top of his or her head does not mean that one has not learned something of the said person's accomplishments. Your quick pivot from the "unique selling point of Obama" to "listing" his accomplishments as a senator was abrupt, onesided, and not as much as a problem in that context as you made it to be. Oberman's words to you were a propos. These were election results. Because of your style we learned very little of Watson's contribution to the discussion.

I must say that your continued pressing of Watson in your typical "Hardball Style," after knowing he had no answer, probably said more about you than the senator. Ease up, my brother, and listen to some jazz or something relaxing.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Cheryl Haun Morris, 114 Hillside Circle, Vicksburg, Ms. — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:48:40 GMT

Although I do not support Hillary Clinton, this is what she has been talking about all along. As Karl Rove wrote in The Wall Street Journal:

"Mr. McCain can now question Mr. Obama's promise to change Washington by working across party lines. Mr. Obama hasn't worked across party lines since coming to town. Was he a member of the "Gang of 14" that tried to find common ground between the parties on judicial nominations? Was Mr. Obama part of the bipartisan leadership that tackled other thorny issues like energy, immigration or terrorist surveillance legislation? No. Mr. Obama has been one of the most dependably partisan votes in the Senate."

"Mrs. Clinton can do much more to draw attention to Mr. Obama's lack of achievements. She can agree with Mr. Obama's statement Tuesday night that change is difficult to achieve on health care, energy, poverty, schools and immigration -- and then question his failure to provide any leadership on these or other major issues since his arrival in the Senate. His failure to act, advocate or lead on what he now claims are his priorities may be her last chance to make a winning argument."

These things appeal to the average person who is tired of all the "gotcha politics" in D.C. and want to see more bipartisan cooperation. Also, one wonders why Obama has not proposed any legislation on his so called priorities in the Senate.

He has not stepped up to try to work across party lines on any contentious issues in the Senate.

I am one of those folks who believes a person needs to walk their talk.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

jade — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:58:26 GMT

chris..you were really mean to the sentor from texas...you could apparently see the guy couldn't recite whatever achievements obama has in the lagislature...but why beat a guy while he is down? that shows your insecurity and weakness, if you were a gentlemna you could tell the senator to email u later about it...and it really shows u are one of those who couldn't fathom Obam's stratospheric rise....chris deal with it whether u like it or not u will have black president in the so called white house...what you gono do then? i will make sure u will never get a chance to interview obama because u hate his guts!1

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Julie Riegel, San Francisco, California — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:03:23 GMT

Only one fool was made during this interview ... and he wasn't from Texas. After years of watching you've I've decided to move on. Yes, Mr. Matthews, you have lost a loyal viewer. You are more suited to be working for TMZ because it better matches your interests. Nothing substantive from you ... just gossip, silliness, and spurts of inappropriate harangues. If you don't understand why Obama is winning the hearts of Americans then you haven't paid an ounce of attention to what's been going on in this country for the last 20 years. But, more importantly, you don't understand what motivates people and the human spirit. Julie Riegel

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

C. Taylor — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:04:23 GMT

Has anyone else noticed how desperate Chris is getting now that Hillary is falling behind in the race? We all know (I hope) that he worked for the Clinton's and I have to say that it seems as if he's still on the payroll. This entire thing with Senator Watson is case in point. Chris is always asking Obama supporters the real tough questions at the end of a segment, where either they can't respond fully, or (more to the point) he never gets around to asking the Hillary supporter the same question because, "we have to go to break". Id it happens once, no big deal. Twice, kind of suspicious, but I've personally seen it happen three times in just the last week! Of course he will never admit to it. But it looks like his "hardball" is only being thrown in one direction!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

josephine — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:10:18 GMT

I don't want to know what he said yesterday. I want to know what he said in his response to you! What are the accomplishments he listed? It would have been nice to know this before listening to the debate scheduled for tomorrow.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

John Rivers, Cleveland, Ohio — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:34:28 GMT

Chris Matthews was extremely disrespectful to Senator Watson. MSNBC should reprimand Mr. Matthews and apologize to the senator.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Jon Empey — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:47:36 GMT

Dear Chris,
Thanks so much for exposing Kirk Watson for the lying, conniving, jerkwad that he is, has been, and forever will be.

And those are his good qualities!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Don T, MD — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:24:18 GMT

Chris, when will you ask a Clinton supporter about legislative accomplishments of Senator Clinton since she has been in the Senate?

I think they will find it harder to find an answer than Senator Watson did.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Rebecca Geier, Austin, Texas — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:28:51 GMT

For those of us who have had the pleasure of working with Senator Watson on the important issues facing Central Texas, we know and greatly appreciate and adminre one of his best traits: his honest and candid communications style that results in his outstanding leadership and support. And he proved it again here with his quick and self-deprecating response to his appearance on Hardball. Everyone has moments in their life they wish they could redo (Ok, not necessarily on national TV, but we do things bigger in Texas). In the end, what really separates true leaders is honesty and integrity, especially in more difficulte times.

Speaking for the thousands and thousands of supportive constituents of Senator Watson in Texas who respect his opinion, I'm proud that we have a human being for our state senator who is not too big to admit his mistakes and get us all focused back on what's important - electing our next US President.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Kevin Patterson, Charlotte, NC — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:22:43 GMT

I'm confused why this was a big issue. Sen Watson should have known some of this when asked. I certainly don't have all the facts on these but found them with little effort. This is what I found. Curious to know with all the researchers I suspect Hardball has, why didn't Chris know this alrady - or maybe he did. Take a look at these accomplishments of Obama:
During the first - 8 - eight years of his elected service he sponsored over 820 bills. He introduced
233 regarding healthcare reform,
125 on poverty and public assistance,
112 crime fighting bills,
97 economic bills,
60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills,
21 ethics reform bills,
15 gun control,
6 veterans affairs and many others.

His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills and co-sponsored another 427. These inculded **the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006 - became law, **The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act, - became law, **The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, passed the Senate, **The 2007 Government Ethics Bill, - became law, **The Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill, In committee, and many more.

In all, since entering the U.S. Senate, Senator Obama has written 890 bills and co-sponsored another 1096.
An impressive record, for someone who supposedly has no record according to some who would prefer that this
comparison not be made public.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

John Doe — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:33:42 GMT

Will anyone please name one major accomplishment fron Senator Clinton. I have seen jobs leaving New York in record numbers, her relying on Bill for the smears and the same old Washington money trail.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

lashanda stubbs — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:40:41 GMT

Now call the Congresswomen from Ohio back and ask her the same question.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Sandy Roney, Lake Geneva, Wi — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:44:37 GMT

Chris
That was a great question to ask Sen. Watson. I like Obama....your right only two years in the Senate. Where's the experience. Who was the last President we elected with this kind of experience and what happened? How can we afford to have another President without the knowledge we need to overcome this mess we are in.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Cynthia Linzy — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:58:51 GMT

Chris Matthews interragation of Sen. Kirk Watson was rude and inappropriate. I was more embarrassed for Matthews and his rudeness than for Sen. Watson. Hecklers like Matthews do not belong on respected news networks.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Marilyn Huffman Princeton, West Virginia — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:06:36 GMT

Hey Chris- You looked like a "Big Bully" the other night grilling that Senator. You claimed to be playing "Hardball" however Keith O. correctly pointed out that you weren't on Hardball you were doing election returns. By the way, I've seen you with Ann Coulter and you sure as heck don't play "Hardball" with her. Are you afraid to pick on somebody your own size? Are you intimidated by Ann? You're putty in most people's hand and only "pick on" or play "Hardball" with guest you perceive as less intelligent than yourself. I lost alot of respect for you for humiliating that Senator on National TV.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Thomas Fromm, Swedesboro, NJ — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:11:28 GMT

I love Hardball and think Chris Matthews adds a fresh perspective to issues by actually being willing to have an opinion on occasion. That being said, the treatment of the guy from Texas was lame, and in my opinion an over reaction to Chris getting his balls busted for his perceived over the top comments about Obama, i.e. his honest statement about his positive reaction to a recent speech by Obama. I'm a 52 year old (white) mayor of a small town in South Jersey and I've stopped trying to explain why I am so excited about Obama and why I believe he is the absolute best choice as our next president. I think the feelings of inspiration are real though, and Chris shouldn't be worried about expressing his gut feelings, that's what makes him stand out, the passion. Maybe next time he should ask one of Clinton's minions what HER accomplishments are. Her lifelong crusade for universal healthcare - a complete failure. Her vote on Iraq - a disaster. I am always amazed that the Clinton machine focuses on the poor and uneducated as their base and wonder why they are still poor and uneducated if Clinton was such a great president for them. How about focusing on just what Hillary Clinton has achieved in her "35 years" of experience.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Sean Whitworth — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:16:30 GMT

HILLARY VS. OBAMA LEGISLATIVE

RECORDS:
During Obama''''s first 8 years of elected service Illinois he sponsored over 820 bills - 233 regarding healthcare reform, 125 on poverty and public assistance, 112 crime fighting bills, 97 economic bills, 60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills, 21 ethics reform bills, 15 gun control, 6 veterans affairs and many others. IN ADDITION, DURING HIS FIRST YEAR IN THE U.S. SENATE, HE AUTHORED 152 BILLS AND CO-SPONSORED ANOTHER 427. THESE INCLUDED:
*The Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006
*The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act
*The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act
*The 2007 Government Ethics Bill
*The Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill
In all, since he entered the US Senate, Obama has written 890 bills and co-sponsored another 1,096. FOR SOMEONE WHO SUPPOSEDLY "HAS NO RECORD"
HILLARY, WHO HAS SERVED FOR 6 YEARS IN THE U.S. SENATE,CLAIMS TO KNOW HOW TO GET THINGS DONE HAS MANAGED TO AUTHOR AND PASS INTO LAW ONLY 20 PIECES OF LEGISLATION, ONLY FIVE 5 OF WHICH HAVE ANY REAL SUBSTANCE:
1. Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11.
2. Pay for city projects in response to 9/11
3. Assist landmine victims in other countries.
4. Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care.
5. Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as protected in the wilderness preservation system.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Stan & Jan Buczek — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:38:35 GMT

Mr.Mathews.....we have always enjoyed watching Hardball.....until Tuesday evening. We think you went too far with your attack on Sen. Watson. It was unreasonable, inappropriate and disgusting. We found ourselves not watching Hardball on Wed. for the full hour. Sen. Obama is the man!! Sen. Clinton has not accomplished much so why attack Watson. You went too far.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Cheryl McGonigle, Pittsburgh, PA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:57:50 GMT

Chris.
I applaud you for asking real questions about real things that people want to know. I wonder if you can tell me why it seems that every candidate that runs for politacal office is put under a microscope by the media and yet I have not seen that happen to Barack Obama. I like him but I would like to know more about him besides the hype of a campaign.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Lori Martin — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:29:28 GMT

Matthews was one-sided during this interview. Tubbs-Jones was not very eloquent in her support of Hillary, while saying she has done a lot, did not enumerate any of Hillary's actual accomplishments. Yet, Matthews, did not even challenge her to do so.

While everyone is harping on Obama's supporters for not naming his accomplishments, Hillary's supporters cannot do it either. How hypocritical is that? Her supporters want to say what she is GOING to do ALSO.

Give the American people more credit than you are for being able to see through the biased questioning and commentary.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Diane, Iowa Falls, IA — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:38:07 GMT

I was a pretty big fan of Chris Matthew's until I saw this display on Hardball. There's no escaping the fact that the Texas representative drew a blank. But Matthews never did the responsible reporting to ask the same thing of the elected official supporting Clinton. Where is the equity in reporting here? I've read that the Clinton machine has been coming down pretty hard on Matthews because they think his reporting is unfair. I don't know how that could be, however, because Matthews has never mentioned that if Obama had lost 10 in a row, as has Clinton, he'd be out. Looks to me like he's caving to the Clinton pressure. Russert and Olberman are more credible.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Roman X, Champaign, IL — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:39:54 GMT

I commend you for posting State Sen. Watson's comments from his blog. But I can't help but be a bit disappointed in the idea that this was more of a "Gotcha" moment, then a substantiative discussion. I thought it was the job of the shows such as yours to provide viewers with that sort of information? I am sure other campaigns surrogates, might have similar issues. Not that, that is a defense. Just an observation.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

TD, St Pete, FL — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:41:22 GMT

The governor of Wisconsin also was at a loss when asked the same questions. Unfortunately, a very large percentage of Obama followers are responding to Obama's rhetoric instead of issues and accomplishments. "Faith is blind" really fits as Obama's followers respond blindly as does a flock of sheep.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Chris Seitz, Dallas, Texas — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:53:49 GMT

Maybe if Chris Matthews had been awake and asked this question of the W supporters in 2000, other 'journalists' would have investigated and told us the truth, and we wouldn't have endured the last 7 horrible years. Oh wait I just remembered 1 of W's accomplishments... W did declare Jesus day in Texas on a Sunday in June. That's about the extent of his accomplishments before being President (and of course, there are no further ones in the last 7 years). A better question, Mr. Matthews, would have been what Obama has not supported, such as the illegal war in Iraq, pro-torture legislation and denying children healthcare via S-CHIP. That's enough for myself and many others to support Senator Obama.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

bill hiatt — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:54:52 GMT

The man is in the minors playing ball with one of the best in the majors.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Bob Clausen — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:55:31 GMT

I was embarrassed for Senator Watson's inexcusable ignorance. Putting the whole issue of legislative accomplishment/experience in historical perspective, however, Senator Obama has infinity times any number you choose more legislative accomplishments than 10 of the 13 presidents elected to the presidency since 1900. 10 of the 13(including Bill Clinton whom Hillary vigorously campaigned for) never served in the legislature. Perhaps staying out of the U.S. Legislature is one of the best bets to fulfill one's dream of becoming president.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

TD, St Pete, FL — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:57:54 GMT

Why is the race issue avoided like the plague? The numbers crunchers on the various MSNBC shows I watch regularly fail to point out the fact that if the imbalance of black votes were taken out of the 'total' equation, the 'total' race would be close to even or in fact have Hillary in the lead which in turn would result in more balanced press coverage. It would be a shame to see our next president elected by the 90% of the total 12% black population which would tilt the total vote count by 10%. I am not racist but I also grew up in Chicago and went to a public school which was 90% black. I recognize signs and arrogance in the Obama campaign, especially in some of Michelle's comments that I find troubling. Are we headed down a path to socialism and/or reverse discrimination?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Dan Carey — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:03:23 GMT

The attack on Texas Senator Kirk Watson by Chris Matthews showed Matthews is a bully. He would never do the same hatchet job on a sitting US senator, because they are too powerful. I find the conduct of Chris Matthews very upsetting.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Terry Adkins — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:03:38 GMT

Dear Mr. Matthews,

I caught your interview with this state senator the other night and I just want to say that if your goal was to humiliate a Democratic state senator, congratulations! You also succeeded in making yourself look like a complete jerk, but that's par for the course for you.

I'm not a political "expert" like you, but if you are actually interested in informing your audience about Obama's legislative accomplishments, there are quite a few articles on line that detail his rather impressive contributions. Unlike me, you don't even have to bother to find these articles yourself. I'm sure you have an able staff to do the work for you. Why don't you have them help you put together a report that would actually help inform voters instead of playing "gotcha" games?

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Bob Clausen, Underwood, MN — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:17:40 GMT

While embarrassed for Senator Watson and his ignorance, I'm glad he did some homework and will be able to empirically justify his support for Obama in the future. Putting the issue of legislative accomplishment/experience in historical perspective, however, Senator Obama has infinity times any number you might choose more legislative accomplishments than 10 of the 13 U.S. presidents elected since 1900, since these 10 (including Bill Clinton) never even served in the U.S. Congress. Statistically speaking, if you want to grow up and become president, AVOID THE LEGISLATURE!

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

laurie, Massachusetts — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:35:15 GMT

I came here to express my displeasure at your treatment of Kirk Watson, but it looks as if most viewwers felt the same way about your bullying behavior.

You used to be one of the best in the business - now you sound lazy, bullying, running from one apology to the next, dribbling out one nonsense piece of information after another..............

Your Hardball reputation used to stand for something. Now you get your kicks trying to humiliate good decent people speaking about things that are important to them.

Tip be disappointed in what you've become.

I've been tuning in because of what you used to be, but this episode really showed what you've become. No need to listen to you anymore.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Charles Scott, Shawnee Ok — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:37:23 GMT

Does it really make a difference that you "hardballed" Sen. Watson on why he supports Obama? We know he supports him because he probably gave him some campaign cash. Thats the way the game is played. Ask a John McCain supporter about legislation, they would have a list a mile long. Its not just about getting legislation passed if that was the only criteria then we should vote for McCain but Lemme see if I get this right, Mccain "joined "the military, so he's not a draft dodger, good. His ship, USS Forrestal, almost sank because of a accidental missle launch and he was a part of that. Then he was shot down and became a POW, although it was not his fault, next came the Keating 5 and the S&L fiasco, he was found guilty of poor judgement. Ok, then he ran for president, was doing good, then dropped out, now we know why, more "doing my job, had to be protected from himself, protecting or acting on a freinds behalf, borderline bad judgement"...yep I got it right, this guy has poor judgement, has shadowy dealingswith freinds, and has always been in some sort of mess through no fault of his own...lets protect him and elect him ,at least we know if he's president, we'll have a lifetime screw up who is accident prone and only guilty of poor judgement. This could have all been prevented if he would have used "good judgement" and dodged the draft.I geuss legislation is the deciding factor. I would rather vote for a guy who has HOPE, rather than accept as "experience" a lifetime of "poor judgement". By the way, Hillary is just another McCain, a little younger and different gender, same history just a little differnt circumstances.

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

John — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:43:16 GMT

"Let's take a close look at who's really qualified and/or who's really working for the good of all of us while serving in the Senate.
Obama or Clinton?"
Records of these two candidates should be scrutinized in order to make an informed decision. In her first six years Hillary managed to author and pass into law 20 pieces of legislation. These bills can be found on the website of the Library of Congress.

1- Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site.
2- Support the goals and ideals of Better Hearing and Speech Month.
3- Recognize the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.
4- Name courthouse after Thurgood Marshall.
5- Name courthouse after James L. Watson.
6- Name post office after Jonn A. O'Shea.
7- Designate Aug. 7, 2003, as National Purple Heart Recognition Day.
8- Support the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition Day.
9- Honor the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton on the bicentennial of his death.
10- Congratulate the Syracuse University Orange Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship.
11- Congratulate the Le Moyne College Dolphins Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship.
12- Establish the 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution Commemorative Program.
13- Name post office after Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda.
14- Honor Shirley Chisholm for her service to the nation and express condolences on her death.
15- Honor John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, firefighters who lost their lives on duty.
16- Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11.
17- Pay for city projects in response to 9/11
18- Assist landmine victims in other countries.
19- Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care.
20- Designate part of the National Forest System in
Puerto Rico as protected in the wilderness preservation system.

There you have it, the Hillary legislative facts straight from the Senate records.
The following is a list of Barack Obama's legislative accomplishments, but the list is so substantive they are categorized, rather than listed individually. Besides, there's simply too many of them.
During his first eight years in the Illinois legislature, Obama sponsored more than 820 bills.
* 233 regarding healthcare reform
* 125 on poverty and public assistance
* 112 crime fighting bills
* 97 economic bills
* 60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills
* 21 ethics reform bills
* 15 gun control
* 6 veterans affairs and many others
* Many more miscellaneous bills

His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills, and co-sponsored another 427.
These include:
* Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006 - enacted.
* Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act - enacted.
* Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, passed the Senate.
* 2007 Government Ethics Bill, enacted.
* Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill, in committee.
In all, since entering the U.S. Senate, Obama has written 890 bills and co-sponsored another 1,096.
An impressive record, for someone who supposedly has no record according to some who would prefer that this comparison not be made public.
Now it's up to you to decide who's the doer and who's the talker."

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Barbara Mallett Star Tannery Virginia — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:51:57 GMT

LOOKING CLOSER AT THE McCain/NYTimes Story....

If I am correct, three or so years ago, Barack Obama's republican opponent for the Senate was forced to resign due to a "sex scandal", Alan Keyes ran instead, and Obama went on to win the Senate seat.

Obama is well into a media attack of McCain policy, and visa versa, he is of course assuming he will get the nomination.

Do you think this is a coincidence ?
Just one more republican opponent out of the way ???

Let's please look a little deeper into who is behind this and the timing of the NYT story? If is was to have been held (ie October) then it sounds even less like a coincidence - and all the more like a plan...and who has been saying...lets stick to the issues ???

Chris thank you for your coverage of the candidates and issues that are not being discussed elsewhere.
I am tired of the free ride being given to the current front runners...

I "HOPE" we get to the bottom of this..

Barbara
Virginia

Better late than never: Sen. Watson responds

Antoinette Sabatka, Fort Myers, Florida — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:06:49 GMT

I am a huge fan of Chris Matthews. I watch his show every night and also on Sunday morning. However, I do feel he went too far in grilling Senator Kirk Watson about Barack Obama accomplishments. It seemed that the interview was more about bullying and humiliating Senator Watson than about true journalism. I was uncomfortable and embarassed for the good senator. I think Chris Matthews needs to chill out.