<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hardblogger : Hilary Rosen</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Winners: Romney and McCain</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/03/181715.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:181715</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>56</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/181715.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=181715</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;I disagree with 90% of what was said on the stage tonight so take my review with that in mind.&amp;nbsp; I am judging the performances by who made the best presentation of their beliefs, who looked most presidential and who articulated clear plans for his presidency.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I would have thought that Rudy Guliani would have been able to demonstrate more skill in this format. But Romney and McCain were the clear winners tonight.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Gov Jim Gilmore beat the pool of second tier candidates. &lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181715" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1143.aspx">G.O.P. debate</category></item><item><title>Bill Clinton back in the White House? </title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/03/181691.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:181691</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/181691.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=181691</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;Credit to Romney, Brownbeck, Huckbee and McCain for responding to the&amp;nbsp; question by focusing on on the Hillary Clinton as President rather than the spouse&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181691" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1143.aspx">G.O.P. debate</category></item><item><title>Chris creates debate</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/03/181631.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:181631</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/181631.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=181631</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;I like how Chris is encouraging people who may disagree with an answer that someone just gave to speak up.&amp;nbsp; It is a good way to realize that there are differences between these guys.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;And I like the way he is trying to get them to actually answer questions they want to dodge. A gentler version of Hardball. Because he knows that if they really want to dodge a question, that is something the viewers should see.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181631" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1143.aspx">G.O.P. debate</category></item><item><title>Spotlight on John Chambers</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/03/181621.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:181621</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/181621.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=181621</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Well John Chambers, Chairman of CISCO will get lots of attention tomorrow.&amp;nbsp; He is also one of the most aggressive CEO lobbyists on behalf of favorable tech policies.&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181621" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1143.aspx">G.O.P. debate</category></item><item><title>Where's Rudy?</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/03/181545.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:181545</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/181545.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=181545</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;Is Guliani even in this deabte?&amp;nbsp; This "I was a Governor and therefore&amp;nbsp; I....." is very interesting.&amp;nbsp; Lots of credential flashing tonight.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;That didn't happen much in the Democratic debate.&amp;nbsp; Here it has put Romney and Gilmore out front with more confidence.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;McCain is keeping up.&amp;nbsp; But Where is Rudy??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181545" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1143.aspx">G.O.P. debate</category></item><item><title>The winner?</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/26/170778.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170778</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/170778.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=170778</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;When Pat Buchanan and Bob Shrum agree so definitively on something - what else is there to say? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=170778" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category></item><item><title>Is Obama moving towards Clinton on terrorism?</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/26/170565.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170565</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/170565.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=170565</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;After the first question, there was some space between them on their answer to a question about how they would respond to a domestic terrorist attack.&amp;nbsp; Obama expressed concern that we carefully deal with international colleagues.&amp;nbsp; Clinton made it clear that retaliation against the enemy would be right in her sights if the blame could be clearly identified. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;I thought it was going to stand that way and he would be viewed as more reserved in international aggression.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;Yet this didn't stand, Obama needed to come back and use another question to assure people that he thinks that a serious military response is sometimes called for.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;Then he gets in a fight with Kucinich and he is the hawk.&amp;nbsp; No, it isn't your imagination.&amp;nbsp; He aligned himself purposely with the views of&amp;nbsp; Hillary Clinton.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=170565" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1140.aspx">Democratic debates</category></item><item><title>Clinton and Obama: Who is stronger on terrorism?</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/26/170511.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170511</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/170511.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=170511</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;After the first question, there was some space between them on their answer to a question about how they would respond to a domestic terrorist attack.&amp;nbsp; Obama expressed concern that we carefully deal with international colleagues.&amp;nbsp; Clinton made it clear that retaliation against the enemy would be right in her sights if the blame could be clearly identified. &lt;BR&gt;I thought it was going to stand that way and he would be viewed as more reserved in international aggression.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;Yet this didn't stand, Obama needed to come back and use another question to assure people that he thinks that a serious military response is sometimes called for.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;Then he gets in a fight with Kucinich and he is the hawk.&amp;nbsp; No, it isn't your imagination.&amp;nbsp; He aligned himself purposely with the views of&amp;nbsp; Hillary Clinton.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=170511" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1140.aspx">Democratic debates</category></item><item><title>The Gay Married Elephant in the Room</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/26/170463.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170463</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/170463.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=170463</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;Chris Dodd made the case for same sex marriage so eloquently and then said he was against it.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Too bad this issue didn't go down the line with other candidates. I'm sure there will be other chances for them all to finesse this issue. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=170463" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1140.aspx">Democratic debates</category></item><item><title>Issue roundup</title><link>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/26/170311.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:170311</guid><dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/comments/170311.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/commentrss.aspx?PostID=170311</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" hspace=5 src="http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050913/050913_HilaryRosen_mug.thumb.jpg" align=left border=0&gt;Abortion - everyone but Dodd was OK&amp;nbsp; (He said he didn't regret voting for the not-so - secret right winger Justice Roberts).&amp;nbsp; No throw to Hillary was disappointing given the importance of the issue to women.&amp;nbsp; Obama did a good job on the big picture and Biden was the only one who took on Brian's theory that the American people support limits on abortion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;Guns - frankly, everyone was vague.&amp;nbsp; They should have talked about how the Republicans let the assault rifle ban lapse.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Edwards should have knocked this one out.&amp;nbsp; He didn't seem to have a focused message for the tax versus funding of healthcare issue.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Clinton used the opportunity to turn around Brian's attack on her popularity as a call for change on domestic issues. Effective.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Obama skirted the issue of funding of his priorities and instead made an effective case for more health care by using personal stories. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Clinton spoke with final authority on health care.&amp;nbsp; Can anyone really match her knowledge on this?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;On these Domestic issues, everyone is playing nice with each other's ideas and experience.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style='clear:both;'&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=170311" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1028.aspx">Hilary Rosen</category><category domain="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/category/1140.aspx">Democratic debates</category></item></channel></rss>